On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, FemmeFatale wrote:
> hm... well... I usually just tell it to open up all the packages on the
> tree into a tree-like structure. Have to look for that symbol now.
>
> This raises a new Question though. I've tried twice now to install from
> my HDD and heres what I do:
>
hm... well... I usually just tell it to open up all the packages on the
tree into a tree-like structure. Have to look for that symbol now.
This raises a new Question though. I've tried twice now to install from
my HDD and heres what I do:
Make bootfloppy with the hd.img file form the CD's us
> But the full Emacs and XEmacs are. Micro Emacs was a cut down version to work
> on Micro Computers. I had a copy on my Amiga, in the good/bad old days.
Emacs' and MicroEmacs' feature/command commonalities may
have been identical long ago when ME was first developed.
But the key bindings are d
On Saturday 22 June 2002 09:16 pm, you wrote:
> But the full Emacs and XEmacs are. Micro Emacs was a cut down version to
> work on Micro Computers. I had a copy on my Amiga, in the good/bad old
> days.
Ah, the Amiga
I had an A1000 and other models...
I still miss that "under the CPU"
> I know that Alsa and another sound system (forgot its name at present) should
> not be run in tandem, but what else is there?
I don't think there's an ad hoc list, but there are certain things
you wouldn't want to try and use together -- like sendmail and postfix;
i's pretty obvious that you c
Michael Adams wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:32, darklord wrote:
>
>>On Saturday 22 June 2002 01:35 am, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
>>> Undoubtedly, you will enjoy learning about Xtart, prozilla, ruby, cint,
>>>f2c, R-base, amphetamine
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 04:39, Miark wrote:
> > ...toggle to the flat list where you have a POSIX sorted list of all the
> > packages you can install with your selected packages checkmarked.
> >
> > What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
> > Undoubtedly, you will enjoy lea
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:32, darklord wrote:
> On Saturday 22 June 2002 01:35 am, you wrote:
>
>
>
> > What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
> > Undoubtedly, you will enjoy learning about Xtart, prozilla, ruby, cint,
> > f2c, R-base, amphetamine, LISa, mercury, ocaml,
darklord wrote:
> On Saturday 22 June 2002 01:35 am, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
>> Undoubtedly, you will enjoy learning about Xtart, prozilla, ruby, cint,
>>f2c, R-base, amphetamine, LISa, mercury, ocaml, happy, hugs, haskell,
>>nasm, n
On Saturday 22 June 2002 12:35 am, civileme wrote:
>
> Well in one of mandrakesoft's least ergonomic moments,
I actually like the way they are all put in one list in alphabetical order. I
think redhat's and suse's way of doing it is tedious. :P Mandrake - the
lazy man's OS. :D
-s
W
> ...toggle to the flat list where you have a POSIX sorted list of all the
> packages you can install with your selected packages checkmarked.
>
> What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
> Undoubtedly, you will enjoy learning about Xtart, prozilla, ruby, cint,
> f2c
On Saturday 22 June 2002 01:35 am, you wrote:
> What fun to scroll through 3000+ descriptions and package names!!!
> Undoubtedly, you will enjoy learning about Xtart, prozilla, ruby, cint,
> f2c, R-base, amphetamine, LISa, mercury, ocaml, happy, hugs, haskell,
> nasm, nano, nedit, cooledit, an
oh its on the Cd's all right. Thats where I installed flux from in the
first place. Its just not an option when installing MDK on a newly
formatted partition.
Miark wrote:
> As I recall, Fluxbox is not on the 8.2 CDs. You'll
> have to snag it from rpmfind.net.
>
> Miark
>
>
>
> FemmeFatal
As I recall, Fluxbox is not on the 8.2 CDs. You'll
have to snag it from rpmfind.net.
Miark
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> saith:
> when i go to install MDK I was looking for Fluxbox on the list of
> installable items.
>
> it doesn't show up though. I found *By accident*, the "alien" packa
> When I get to specifying the partitions, I select auto-allocate and
> everything looks okay (does not alter hda) but when I click done I get:
> "Partition table of drive hda(which is my win2k partion) is going to be
> written to disk!" .
I think you're getting confused by the difference be
You are not just whistling Dixie here! I lost my
entire mp3 library...cause I had no place to put it
while I repartitioned the drive. The library was
nearly a gig in size and most of which I encoded
personallyit was a great loss.
Despite that ... I am back up to nearly 500 megs
on my mp3 fi
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Walter Hanagriff wrote:
>it wasnt confusing at all, answers are that my entire HD is dedicated to
>windows, partitioning shouldnt be a problem i think. one of my other
>questions on this list was about that.
>i will be getting mandrake 7.1, i havent gotten it yet, am trying
it wasnt confusing at all, answers are that my entire HD is dedicated to
windows, partitioning shouldnt be a problem i think. one of my other
questions on this list was about that.
i will be getting mandrake 7.1, i havent gotten it yet, am trying to prepare
for everything before i download and
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Hanagriff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 June 2000 09:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] installation question
>
>
> i am reading the installation documentation at mandrake
> homepage to prepare myself, and a part in Installation wit
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Walter Hanagriff wrote:
Hello Walter,
I am not sure if my writing adds to your help or your confusion, but:
Do you have your entire HD dedicated to Windows at the moment? You will
need some space to put Mandrake. I would go for at least 2Gb.
If you have that much free (= unp
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Ron Greer wrote:
>
>If I have just a list of RPMs I want to install, is there any way I can put
>that file somewhere and have that be the default loaded RPMs for a base
>install?
> -=Ron=-
Hi Ron,
This sounds a bit two-sided.
A base install sounds like a new setup for
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> Hello Newbies:
>I burnt all of the files from RPM folder,
> whatelse do I need to get a complete copy of 7.0? Is it better to copy all
> from 7.0 folder instead?
>
> Thanks In Advance
>
Get the ISO image. *THAT* will get you a complete
22 matches
Mail list logo
