On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 17:33:28 -0700, you wrote:
>Did you DL using DSL? I tried @ 56k, but it would require 32 plus hours per
file
>(/iso/...).
>-Cmo
LOL...a couple months ago, I downloaded 7.1...it took 52 hours. Just
for ha has, I started to download it when I got my cable modem.
According to
I am in the process of downloading 7.2 on a 33.6k modem overnight. It takes
about 8 days. I don't need it tomorrow so no need to spend money.
On an unrelated subject, is there some reason why, when replying to messages
on this maillist, that it replies to the sender rather than the list? (ie)
Charles wrote:
> Did you DL using DSL? I tried @ 56k, but it would require 32 plus hours
> per file (/iso/...).
> -Cmo
>
> sobe wrote:
>
> > [snip] The next week 7.2 was released, chomping at the bit i waited a
> > [whole
> > week to download the latest... [snip]
>
>
Why mess with trying to
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 17:33:28 -0700, you wrote:
>Did you DL using DSL? I tried @ 56k, but it would require 32 plus hours per file
>(/iso/...).
>-Cmo
LOL...a couple months ago, I downloaded 7.1...it took 52 hours. Just
for ha has, I started to download it when I got my cable modem.
According to th
Did you DL using DSL? I tried @ 56k, but it would require 32 plus hours per file
(/iso/...).
-Cmo
sobe wrote:
> [snip] The next week 7.2 was released, chomping at the bit i waited a whole
> week to download the latest... [snip]
