no proof either, but i do know i burned up 3 of their cpus in the early k-6
and before that models. i also know i have overclocked the 750 i have now
and run it non-stop with a fair load.
problem solved if you ask me, but then nobody did. :-)
On Thursday 07 February 2002 04:56, you spoke unt
AMD were getting peeved because Intel kept claiming that faster processors
(measured in MHZ) are the be all and end all of everything, and using that
as a selling point of the P4..
what they didn't tell you, is that even a PIII of an equiv clock speed is
faster then a P4, because Intel didn't wa
>The "1800+" model number (it is _not_ the MHz speed) means "this is as
>fast or faster than a Pentium 4 going at 1800MHz".
I think the PR rating is the equivalent speed compared to the Thunderbird
based Athlons (the ones that went up to 1.4GHz. I think they may get into
hot water if they compare
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:28:41 +0700, Brian Durant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Again, I strongly recommend an AMD-based system. You can get better
> >bang-for-buck that way. Someone else on the list recommended a Soyo Dragon
> >motherboard. I second that recommendation. It has built-in sound and et
