On Sunday 20 February 2005 4:33 pm, Michael Woinoski wrote:
> On Mandrake 10.1 Community, when I run "ps -ef", the UID column shows the
> user name for the owner of all processes except the dbus-daemon-1 process
> owned by uid 72. The line for that process shows the numeric uid instead of
> the use
Alexander Ruoff wrote:
I'm running 224Mb ram which I would have thougbt was enough. Although
vid memory is probably a bit light at 16Mb
Hi Graham,
since the OO problem is solved I just got one question... you got a 16
MB graphic card (which shouldn't be a problem... used 8 MB and 16 MB
until very
> I'm running 224Mb ram which I would have thougbt was enough. Although
> vid memory is probably a bit light at 16Mb
Hi Graham,
since the OO problem is solved I just got one question... you got a 16
MB graphic card (which shouldn't be a problem... used 8 MB and 16 MB
until very recently with bo
Miark wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:22:04 +0100, Graham wrote:
It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
alteration and print a single page with about 3 lines of text and a box
on it.
Blow away your .openoffice directory and that'll probably fix it:
rm -rf ~/.openoffice
M
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:22:04 +0100, Graham wrote:
> It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
> alteration and print a single page with about 3 lines of text and a box
> on it.
Blow away your .openoffice directory and that'll probably fix it:
rm -rf ~/.openoffice
Miark
On Thursday 28 October 2004 14:21, Graham Watkins wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 October 2004 02:22 am, Graham Watkins wrote:
> >>Well, why?
> >>
> >>In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
> >>at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
>
>
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 04:21, Graham Watkins wrote:
> Just tried running under root (yes, I know I shouldn't) and it was much
> faster. Then tried starting it as me using xfce4 which is less of a
> memory hog - such a slow opening I wondered for a while if it had
> crashed. Looks like you may
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 03:45, Graham Watkins wrote:
>
> > Abiword.
> >
> I can see your point but the compatibility with Word is likely to keep
> me looking at OO, SO or . Word ;-)
What I do - when I have to use OO, is to open up one instance of it, and
then minimise it - then when I have t
On Thursday 28 October 2004 03:41 pm, Björn Olsson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:21:40 +0100
>
> Graham Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greg Meyer wrote:
>
>
Never say that to a guy :-D
>
> > Just tried running under root (yes, I know I shouldn't) and it was
> > much faster. Then tried
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:21:40 +0100
Graham Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> Just tried running under root (yes, I know I shouldn't) and it was
> much faster. Then tried starting it as me using xfce4 which is less
> of a memory hog - such a slow opening I wondered for a w
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Thursday 28 October 2004 02:22 am, Graham Watkins wrote:
Well, why?
In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
(Snipped)
Is everyone else here having the same experience?
How do you cope?
(Snipp
Alexander Ruoff wrote:
Am Do, den 28.10.2004 schrieb Graham Watkins um 8:22:
Well, why?
In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
(snipped)
Is everyone else here having the same experience?
How do you cope?
(sni
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 16:22, Graham Watkins wrote:
Well, why?
In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
alteration and print a
On Thursday 28 October 2004 02:22 am, Graham Watkins wrote:
> Well, why?
>
> In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
> at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
>
> It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
> alteration and print a
Am Do, den 28.10.2004 schrieb Graham Watkins um 8:22:
> Well, why?
>
> In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
> at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
>
> It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
> alteration and print a s
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 16:22, Graham Watkins wrote:
> Well, why?
>
> In the past I've mostly used Star Office 5.2 which while it doesn't go
> at the speed of light, leaves Open Office 1.1 standing.
>
> It's just taken me about 15 minutes to open a file, make a small
> alteration and print a sing
On Friday 21 May 2004 19:26, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 11:55, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> > On Friday 21 May 2004 17:16, David A. Ferguson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Why does my eth0 show failed?
> > >
> > > When Mdk10oe boots it hangs on the 'bring up eth0' message
> > > for a long
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 11:55, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Friday 21 May 2004 17:16, David A. Ferguson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Why does my eth0 show failed?
> >
> > When Mdk10oe boots it hangs on the 'bring up eth0' message for a
> > long time and then says [FAILED]. Where can I go to look and see
> > more
From: "Tom Brinkman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > DEVICE=eth0
> > BOOTPROTO=dhcp
> try changing this to =static
I will give it a try, but ultimately I will need to use DHCP. What is
weird is that the network actually works. The trouble I have is that
I don't know wh
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> As far as I know after "Alt + F2" and writing "konquerer" and pressing
> enter , Konquerer must run. But with my Mndrk. 10.0 does not run . Why ??!
>
> What do you recommmend ?
>
do not capitalize it
spell it konqueror
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
->
->With an xterm I can not run konquerer. It says "command not found"
->
->H.ERTAS
Umm...its spelled konqueror... :-)
--
/\
On Wed, 19 May 2004 19:58:42 -0700, David E. Fox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:52:23 -0500
"David A. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I will look in syslog the next time it
happens.
I ran a surface scan of the disk and it said ok. I don't know how
t
Op Thu, 20 May 2004 14:58:15 +0300 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> With an xterm I can not run konquerer. It says "command not found"
- Does it work from the menu?
- Can you locate the program running "locate konqueror" from the command
line?
Yes-> It is not in the path
No -> It is not installed
cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] WHY "Alt + F2"
AND "konquerer" command does not function ??
Op Thu, 20 May 2004 14:47:59 +0300 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> As far as I know after "Alt + F2" and writing "konquerer" and pressing
> enter , Konquerer must run. But with my Mndrk. 10.0 does not run . Why
> ??!
>
> What do you recommmend ?
Open an xterm and see if you can run 'konqueror' from
On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:52:23 -0500
"David A. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. I will look in syslog the next time it happens.
> I ran a surface scan of the disk and it said ok. I don't know how
> to test the RAM but I haven't had any other problems at all so I
> would
From: "Damian Gatabria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: "Damian Gatabria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > That's probably not corruption. You are just
> > > experiencing one difference between
> > > windows-like linebreaks and Unix-style linebreaks.
> > >
> > > When you open the textfile on windows
> >
> From: "Damian Gatabria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > That's probably not corruption. You are just
> > experiencing one difference between
> > windows-like linebreaks and Unix-style linebreaks.
> >
> > When you open the textfile on windows
> > you see a small square where the line should
> > end, ri
That's probably not corruption. You are just
experiencing one difference between
windows-like linebreaks and Unix-style linebreaks.
When you open the textfile on windows
you see a small square where the line should
end, right? This is normal. If you need to
convert a file to windows style, try
i
David A. Ferguson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Lijour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Why is my FAT always corrupted by Linux?
Le May 13, 2004 05:00 pm, David A. Ferguson a éc
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Lijour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Why is my FAT always corrupted by Linux?
> Le May 13, 2004 05:00 pm, David A. Ferguson a écrit :
> > I dual
> > I dual boot between Linux and W2k. I store the shared data on a
> > FAT. Whenever I write to it from Linux it almost always comes up
> > corrupted.
> >
> > Is there some special setting I should have in my 'fstab' or
> > something?
> >
> > It is so bad that it is basically useless. I
And just another thought.
I found that unless you included [ actually typed ] the file extension
name ( eg "*.txt") then my system when within windows is not happy about
it at all.
To check others concerns issue the following from your command client:
$su
Password
#fdisk /dev/hda(assumi
Le May 13, 2004 05:00 pm, David A. Ferguson a écrit :
> I dual boot between Linux and W2k. I store the shared data on a FAT.
> Whenever I write to it from Linux it almost always comes up corrupted.
>
> Is there some special setting I should have in my 'fstab' or something?
>
> It is so bad that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 May 2004 16:00:24 -0500
"David A. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dual boot between Linux and W2k. I store the shared data on a
> FAT. Whenever I write to it from Linux it almost always comes up
> corrupted.
>
> Is there some spe
Thanks Aavo -- glad I asked. ;-)
Bob
Aavo Tambur wrote:
Tsiteerin Bob Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone know why the ~ (tilde) in a URL often shows up in
the URL box in Mozilla as %7E ??
0x7E or 126 in decimal is the ASCII code of tilde symbol. In urls a few special
characters (most no
Tsiteerin Bob Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone know why the ~ (tilde) in a URL often shows up in
> the URL box in Mozilla as %7E ??
0x7E or 126 in decimal is the ASCII code of tilde symbol. In urls a few special
characters (most notably the space within a filename) get automatically
conv
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:29:30 -0600
"Smith, Robert A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get no package named gift-openft when I do the rpmi call...
> How do I find out which repository to add to get it
> Sorry for the hassle but it I am just coming back to Mandrake
The first thing I would
ON Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:17 AM trufflesdad scribbled:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:02:34 -0500
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:00 +
> trufflesdad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I did update the eslrahc site and if I do a urpmi gift-plugin
> > it t
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:02:34 -0500
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:00 +
> trufflesdad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I did update the eslrahc site and if I do a urpmi gift-plugin
> > it tells me there is no package by that name..
>
> That is correct
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:00 +
trufflesdad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did update the eslrahc site and if I do a urpmi gift-plugin
> it tells me there is no package by that name..
That is correct there is no pkg named gift-plugin.
gift-plugin is provided by gift-openft
urpmi gift-openft
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:47 am, Charlie wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:31, Schwartz Avi wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:13, Franki wrote:
> >
> > I tried the same with searching for "Windows". MSN initially gave me
> > 2399 results but after many clicks on Next it ended up being o
mwafkowski said:
That "article" belongs in a rag such as the (US) National Inquirier...come
one people. You're really not that bored?!
Nope...please note the National Enquirer URL:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/
and the URL for the article:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12603
Want to b
: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Why MicroSlop wants Google!
>
> On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:13, Franki wrote:
>
> > Schwartz Avi wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 11, 2003, at 8:21, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Check it out - very in
On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:47, Charlie wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:31, Schwartz Avi wrote:
On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:13, Franki wrote:
I tried the same with searching for "Windows". MSN initially gave me
2399 results but after many clicks on Next it ended up being only
1069!
Google gave me
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:31, Schwartz Avi wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:13, Franki wrote:
>
> I tried the same with searching for "Windows". MSN initially gave me
> 2399 results but after many clicks on Next it ended up being only 1069!
> Google gave me 98,600,000. Can you say MSN sucks
On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:13, Franki wrote:
Schwartz Avi wrote:
On Nov 11, 2003, at 8:21, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Check it out - very interesting reading.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12603
Unfortunately for the Inquirer, the article is wrong. If you run the
"Linux Windows" search you get on
Schwartz Avi wrote:
On Nov 11, 2003, at 8:21, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Check it out - very interesting reading.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12603
Unfortunately for the Inquirer, the article is wrong. If you run the
"Linux Windows" search you get on the first page indeed 'Results 1-15 of
I don't believe you answered the question:-
Possibly you don't have kde available as an option in the dropdown list
, and that is your real problem ?
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
.
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: John Richard Smith
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November
> >>04, 2003 8:41 AM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [newbie] Why do I have to start KDE manually?
> >&
;nv' driver. No need to install any
drivers. OTOH, there's no tellin what kind of bugs installin the
proprietary nVidia driver can cause.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November
04, 2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Tony S. Sykes wrote:
What is your hardware? If you have a nvidia geforce4 have you installed
the drivers?
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Why do I have to
John Richard Smith wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I ge
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I get my system to
M.A.Bell wrote:
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I get my system to do this auto
M.A.Bell wrote:
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I get my system to do this autom
mike wrote:
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I get my system to do this automagically?
Star
M.A.Bell wrote:
Greetings.
I've had this problem for a couple of months and had hoped that
installing 9.2 would fix it, but it didn't.
After I boot up, I see a terminal window on a blue screen.
When I enter "startkde", it does.
How can I get my system to do this automagically?
Start kde then open
On Friday 31 Oct 2003 7:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... that BEFORE you get Linux, those who speak in favour of it say
> things like "oh, get Linux coz it is far less demanding on hardware" or
> "you have much more control configuring hardware" or "you are in control"
>
> Then when you do ins
On Friday 31 Oct 2003 12:49 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 31 October 2003 02:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> linux is not less demanding on hardware, but more so.
I think it used to be true, when linux was mainly being used to run a
few server apps. Nowadays we want it to do as wide a va
On Friday 31 October 2003 02:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... that BEFORE you get Linux, those who speak in favour of it say
> things like "oh, get Linux coz it is far less demanding on hardware" or
> "you have much more control configuring hardware" or "you are in control"
>
> Then when you d
On Thursday 30 October 2003 11:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... that BEFORE you get Linux, those who speak in favour of it say
> things like "oh, get Linux coz it is far less demanding on hardware"
> or "you have much more control configuring hardware" or "you are in
> control"
>
> Then when y
On Thursday 30 October 2003 11:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... that BEFORE you get Linux, those who speak in favour of it say
> things like "oh, get Linux coz it is far less demanding on hardware" or
> "you have much more control configuring hardware" or "you are in control"
>
> Then when you
On Wednesday 15 Oct 2003 11:55 pm, Lucio_Costa wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I´m experimenting download 3 mdk 9.2 iso using
> torrent, I don't know why but it's too slow. I
> accessed this link:
> http://torrent.mandrakesoft.com:6969 and I saw my
> infos below. Is it normal?
>
> BitTorrent download info
>
I suggest you model yours after mine, making the necessary adjustments.
The syntax is not that hard to understand. Once you have updated your
lilo.conf, post it here. Note, the append line will be completely
different for you, so I suggest you skip these lines in you
> flavio,
> if you have done
> fdisk /dev/hdd
> and confirmed that windows is indeed on the first parttition on that disk and
> that it does have the number 1 - not necessarily the same thing!
> then i suggest that lilo is choking ion your other entries, perhaps those
> other entries regarding /dev
flavio,
if you have done
fdisk /dev/hdd
and confirmed that windows is indeed on the first parttition on that disk and
that it does have the number 1 - not necessarily the same thing!
then i suggest that lilo is choking ion your other entries, perhaps those
other entries regarding /dev/hdd1?
basc
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:31:50 +
Flávio Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you have three of the same entries? What are these for
> > anyway? I think you would be safe in getting rid of these.
> >
> > > other="dev/hdd1"
> > > label="windows"
> > >
> Why do you have three of the same entries? What are these for anyway? I
> think you would be safe in getting rid of these.
>
> > other="dev/hdd1"
> > label="windows"
> > table=/dev/hdd
> > map-drive=0x80
> > to=0x81
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:30:58 +
Flávio Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> let me put it up top so Flavio might see it
>
> I guess it means you better post your /etc/lilo.conf cause you
> don't
> have the right hdyx (here y is a letter for the drive po
let me put it up top so Flavio might see it
I guess it means you better post your /etc/lilo.conf cause you
don't
have the right hdyx (here y is a letter for the drive position
on the
ide bus, and the x is a number for a partition.
you
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:01:42 +
Flávio Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > my Linux is in hdc6
> > > and my win98 is in hdd1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# lilo
> Warning: LBA32 addressing assumed
> Fatal: Not a number: "padrã"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]#
>
>
Coul
let me put it up top so Flavio might see it
I guess it means you better post your /etc/lilo.conf cause you don't
have the right hdyx (here y is a letter for the drive position on the
ide bus, and the x is a number for a partition.
your error might be any part of /etc/lilo.conf, so post the whole t
It worked for me.
I installed Linux 9.0 on a brand new 60 gig HD then slaved my old 40 gig
Win98 drive to that one, pointed Lilo to it and it booted just fine. My
Win drive has since crashed altogether so I am totally Linux now.
I did my editing in MCC
Russ
I guess it means you better post y
> > my Linux is in hdc6
> > and my win98 is in hdd1
> >
>
> Make this your windows entry in /etc/lilo.conf:
>
> other=/dev/hdd1
> label="windows"
> table=/dev/hdd
> map-drive=0x80
> to=0x81
> map-drive=0x81
> to=0x80
>
>
> Save the file
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:32:29 +
Flávio Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess it means you better post your /etc/lilo.conf cause you
> > > don't have the right hdyx (here y is a letter for the drive
> > > position on the ide bus, and the x is a number for a parti
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 19:27, ed tharp wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 07:10, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:52, yankl wrote:
> > > On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:46 am, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> > > > Hi...
> > > > I'm very newbie in Linux and I have a problem to make something h
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess it means you better post your /etc/lilo.conf cause you don't
> > have the right hdyx (here y is a letter for the drive position on the
> > ide bus, and the x is a number for a partition. I don't think you are
> > gonna get win9x on without it being on the first partition
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 07:10, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:52, yankl wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:46 am, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> > > Hi...
> > > I'm very newbie in Linux and I have a problem to make something here...
> > >
> > > After install Mandrake 9.1 in my hd,
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:52, yankl wrote:
> On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:46 am, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> > Hi...
> > I'm very newbie in Linux and I have a problem to make something here...
> >
> > After install Mandrake 9.1 in my hd, I bring another with win98 already
> > have and install it...
>
On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:46 am, Flávio Henrique wrote:
> Hi...
> I'm very newbie in Linux and I have a problem to make something here...
>
> After install Mandrake 9.1 in my hd, I bring another with win98 already
> have and install it...
>
> I trying to insert the win98 in LILO menu but it do
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:27:41 +1000
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 03:07, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> >
> > > Finger-Licking-Good-Femme
> > >
> > > (or so they tell me)
> >
> > I can see a herd of law
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:17:10 +1000
Stephen Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 02:08, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
>
> > Femme:
> > Well, now we know why you didn't choose a career in the diplomatic
> > service.-- cmg
>
> Yeah - that might be true...God...I wanted to say something
On Saturday 04 October 2003 11:53 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> As the Taxidermist said(while. taking his girlfriend to dinner) you
> gotta stuff the bird before you mount it
Yea, and I'm a "firm" believer that one in the "bush" is worth 2 in the hand
anytime
--
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 02:39, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 03 October 2003 05:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
>
> > hehe... hm... think they'd let me off if I put the little Copyright
> > symbol in there?
>
> Debatable...
>
> > Running from Col.Sanders
> > Femme
>
> Hehehehe, you better - I hea
On Friday 03 October 2003 05:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> hehe... hm... think they'd let me off if I put the little Copyright
> symbol in there?
Debatable...
> Running from Col.Sanders
> Femme
Hehehehe, you better - I hear one of his fav slogans is "the birds the
word"
--
On Friday 03 October 2003 01:33 pm, mwafkowski wrote:
> There is no "Kentucky Fried Chicken", remember, as in Kentucy - associated
> with rednecks?/fried chicken-as in fried=heart attacks.
>
> It's KFC to you , Suh!
>
> MRW
Well, I do live in Kentucky...
I did stain (cedar siding) part of my hous
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:07:42 -0400
"Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
>
> > Finger-Licking-Good-Femme
> >
> > (or so they tell me)
>
> I can see a herd of lawyers from "Kentucky Fried Chicken"
> bearing down on you, even a
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:08:42 -0400
Carroll Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 07:52 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
> >
> > "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please
> >
ent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Why so many reboots ?
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
>
> > Finger-Licking-Good-Femme
> >
> > (or so they tell me)
>
> I can see a herd of lawyers from &qu
On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:31 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> Finger-Licking-Good-Femme
>
> (or so they tell me)
I can see a herd of lawyers from "Kentucky Fried Chicken" bearing
down on you, even as we speak Femme! :-)
--
On Thursday 02 October 2003 07:52 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
>
> "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please send
> > no further newbie "communications"and remove my name from your list.
>
> and who th
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:56:52 -0400
Todd Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't be so hard on yourself, Femme, it probably *was* addressed
> directly to you. I got one myself and was tempted to respond in like
> manner, but just told him he must have signed himself up since the
> list requires co
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:45:57 -0400
Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the love of pete--if anyone responds to this, please tar and gzip
> the list first! 8-D
>
> Miark
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:23:34 -0400, Heather/Femme
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Two times in aas many weeks... w
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:23:34PM -0400, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:12:14 -0400
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:52, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
> > > "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
For the love of pete--if anyone responds to this, please tar and gzip
the list first! 8-D
Miark
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:23:34 -0400, Heather/Femme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two times in aas many weeks... wth is wrong with me?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:12:14 -0400
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:52, Heather/Femme wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
> > "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please
> > > send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
October 2, 2003 05:52 pm, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
>
> "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please send
> > no further newbie "communications"and remove my
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:52, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
> "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please send
> > no further newbie "communications"and remove my name from your list.
>
> and who the
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 19:52, Heather/Femme wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:18:19 -0700
> "M J Pipkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is unsolicited spam and an invasion of my privacy. Please send
> > no further newbie "communications"and remove my name from your list.
>
> and who the flyin
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
