Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-30 Thread John Richard Smith
Michael Adams wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:24, John Richard Smith wrote: Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 04:53, John Richard Smith wrote: I did it this way, I cd into directory then , #rm libxyz it asked Yes or no, Y it seems to remove it. Am I right. John --

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 03:04, John Richard Smith wrote: > > > >I fully understand, though. Keep in mind that symbolic links are to *nix > >what "shortcuts" are to Windows (very basically put - but not entirely > >true - but the analogy works well in this instance). > > > >Symbolic links are quite u

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread John Richard Smith
Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Friday 29 November 2002 11:04 am, you wrote: So them how do aliases fit into the grand scheme of things in linux. John John, let me give you an example of how aliases work for me. I use WineX to play Windog games under Linux. Sometimes, the commands to start t

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread John Richard Smith
Michel Clasquin wrote: On Friday 29 November 2002 18:04, John Richard Smith wrote: I see, so symlinks aid initiation by linking commands to devices and apps and as such are quite different in nature from a pipe which is , if I understand correctly, a way of diverting a stream of data , refere

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread Michel Clasquin
On Friday 29 November 2002 18:04, John Richard Smith wrote: > I see, so symlinks aid initiation by linking commands to devices > and apps and as such > are quite different in nature from a pipe which is , if I > understand correctly, a way > of diverting a stream of data , refered to as standard o

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread John Richard Smith
Stephen Kuhn wrote: I fully understand, though. Keep in mind that symbolic links are to *nix what "shortcuts" are to Windows (very basically put - but not entirely true - but the analogy works well in this instance). Symbolic links are quite useful - much like the Windows shortcuts. You ca

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-29 Thread John Richard Smith
Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 04:53, John Richard Smith wrote: I did it this way, I cd into directory then , #rm libxyz it asked Yes or no, Y it seems to remove it. Am I right. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Or, login as root, do a cd /, then type

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-28 Thread Erik Farnsworth
This example is exactly the reason I didn't offer rm -f as an option--when in root, it does it...period. With rm the user is asked to confirm the delete (and lists what will be deleted) before it is done. Good place for a newbie to make sure they are getting what they asked for. Erik On Thu,

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-28 Thread Robin Ballantine
On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:35 am, robin wrote: > John Richard Smith wrote: > > How do you remove a symbolic link. > > > > neither man ln, nor info ln , even mentions it. > > I've always found rm works fine. What you can't do is directly replace > one symbolic link with another. > > Sir Robin

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-28 Thread John Richard Smith
Erik Farnsworth wrote: rm libxyz-0 -> libxyz-0.1 rm libxyz-0 On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 03:13, John Richard Smith wrote: How do you remove a symbolic link. neither man ln, nor info ln , even mentions it. John I did it this way, I cd into directory then , #rm libxyz it asked Ye

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links

2002-11-28 Thread robin
John Richard Smith wrote: How do you remove a symbolic link. neither man ln, nor info ln , even mentions it. I've always found rm works fine. What you can't do is directly replace one symbolic link with another. Sir Robin -- "You almost never hear that word "computer" anymore, do you? They

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links between Netscape inbox files in Linux and DOS

1999-10-22 Thread sphilp
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 12:17:59AM +0100, Colin Murphy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 10:49:03PM +0100, colin.murphy wrote: > > > It would be kinda neat if I could set up a symbolic links for Netscape > > > in Linux to use the equivalent DOS files for things like

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links between Netscape inbox files in Linux and DOS

1999-10-22 Thread Colin Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 10:49:03PM +0100, colin.murphy wrote: > > It would be kinda neat if I could set up a symbolic links for Netscape > > in Linux to use the equivalent DOS files for things like the message > > files. This would keep both Netscape's in sync. > > > >

Re: [newbie] Symbolic links between Netscape inbox files in Linux and DOS

1999-10-18 Thread sphilp
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 10:49:03PM +0100, colin.murphy wrote: > It would be kinda neat if I could set up a symbolic links for Netscape > in Linux to use the equivalent DOS files for things like the message > files. This would keep both Netscape's in sync. > > Would this work? More importantly,

RE: [newbie] symbolic links

1999-08-16 Thread Bret Craw
I don't know about the symbolic link, but you should be able to find the XFree86-VGA server on the disk. It is probably under /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS. Then install the VGA server. I had the same problem with my Voodoo Banshee. Installed the VGA server, then installed the 3DFX drivers and it w

RE: [newbie] symbolic links

1999-08-15 Thread scott worley
It sounds like you are trying to install the XFree86_3Dfx-XFree86Setup rpm. It requires the VGA16 X server to run. You can install the XFree86-VGA16-3.3.3.1-58mdk.rpm from the install CD. scottw On 15-Aug-99 RReed wrote: > Well I can't get the voodoo3 goods to install it keeps saying it can't fi

Re: [newbie] symbolic links

1999-08-15 Thread pete moss
RReed wrote: > > Well I can't get the voodoo3 goods to install it keeps saying it can't find > vga16. > So I guess I will just use startx -- -bpp 32 to start x in 32 bit.. i edited > the config to use only 800x600 and nothing lower. > A question I have is can i setup a symbolic link to run startx