--- Original Message -
> From: "David P. Greenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Axalon Bloodstone"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 7:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] T
.
- Original Message -
From: "David P. Greenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
> Oh, now you've got my juices flowing. When is ground not zero volts? Of
> c
: Lyndon Lininger Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, November 21, 1999 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
>Very true, but ground is not always zero voltage. It depends on the point
of
>reference that you measure i
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Ralph wrote:
> A positive nothing is better than a negative anything.
>
I'm fixin to declare a winner
how 'bout y'all ?:)
--
.. Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
> On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Ralph | byte | wrote:
> >
> > > A positive nothing is better than a negative any
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, David P. Greenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Ralph | byte | wrote:
> >
> > > A positive nothing is better than a negative anything.
> > >
> > > byte
> >
> > Not really, it just depends what the numbers represent, i can
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Ralph | byte | wrote:
>
> > A positive nothing is better than a negative anything.
> >
> > byte
>
> Not really, it just depends what the numbers represent, i can think of
> several uses for ground wires :)
--Except that grou
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 7:46 PM
> Subject: RE: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
>
>
> > 0 is in fact an imaginary number. Try and imagine having zero of
> something.
> > 0 x 1 implies there
>
A positive nothing is better than a negative anything.
byte
- Original Message -
From: "James Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
> 0 is in fact an imaginar
ok, i'm no math whiz, but i seem to remember imaginary numbers being used
for something else. it is the set of numbers used to describe the square
root of negative numbers. think of what the square root of -4 is. zero isn't
an imaginary number because it has a square root, zero.
>0 is in fact a
of
> something is in its self contradiction. You can't have nothing of something.
>
> Or have i just drank too much coffee today...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Heckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 20 November 1999 21:46
> > To: [
today...
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Heckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 November 1999 21:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
>
>
> PadLocke wrote:
> >
> > zeros aren't odd or even. They're Pretty
when divided by two, odd numbers have a remainder, even numbers don't. zero
divided by two has no remainder, so it's even
True enough, but zero is BY DEFINITION neither odd nor even. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 11/20/99, 2:45:55 PM, Peter Heckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has a two in it - all the digits have to be odd.
John the Nadger
> ** Original Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
> ** Original Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** Original Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:00:47 -0500
> ** Original Message follows...
>
> From:
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or even?
>
According to a report on NPR last night, they were assumed to be even.
John
gt;
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
>
>
> > But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or even?
> >
> > J
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> >
>> But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or
even?
>>
>According to a report on NPR last night, they were assumed to be even.
I think if you talk to a "real mathematician" (which leaves me out) zero
isn't odd or even, just as the negative numbers aren't odd or even. The
>> But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or
even?
>>
>According to a report on NPR last night, they were assumed to be even.
I think if you talk to a "real mathematician" (which leaves me out) zero
isn't odd or even, just as the negative numbers aren't odd or even. The
>> But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or
even?
>>
>According to a report on NPR last night, they were assumed to be even.
I think if you talk to a "real mathematician" (which leaves me out) zero
isn't odd or even, just as the negative numbers aren't odd or even. The
>> But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or
even?
>>
>According to a report on NPR last night, they were assumed to be even.
I think if you talk to a "real mathematician" (which leaves me out) zero
isn't odd or even, just as the negative numbers aren't odd or even. The
ECTED]
ICQ:26147713
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 11/20/99, 10:51:45 AM, "Ken Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding RE: [newbie] Totally u
erg
Bitco Electronics
"In Service to the Recording Industry"
**Rock on with glowing glass**
-Original Message-
From: PadLocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, November 19, 1999 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Totally useless fact (OS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
>
> what about 1/9/2001?
> is that not odd a nod number? 1 is odd, 9 is nod and oh yeah 2001 is a odd
> number ;-P
>
The original post referred to all odd DIGITS! 2 is NOT an odd digit ;o)
Mike
++
Michae
But the "2" in "2001" is not. here is a good one...are zeros od or even?
J
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
>
> what about 1/9/2001?
> is that not odd a nod number? 1 is odd, 9 is nod and oh yeah 2001 is a odd
> number ;-P
>
>
>
>
>
> bluebottle <[EMAIL PROTECTED
yes it is, BUT 2 is an even digit and I think the point was that 11-19-1999
will be the last calander date with all odd digits.
This person probably also realizes that today is the first day of the rest of
the week :) *chuckle* jk
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
>
>
True, but he did say all odd digits
^^
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
>
> what about 1/9/2001?
> is that not odd a nod number? 1 is odd, 9 is nod and oh yeah 2001 is a odd
> number ;-P
>
>
>
>
>
> bluebottl
From: Ronald A. Yacketta
what about 1/9/2001?
is that not odd a nod number? 1 is odd, 9 is nod and oh yeah 2001 is a odd
number ;-P
bluebottle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/19/99 11:55:40 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ronald A. Yacketta/958157/EK
28 matches
Mail list logo
