Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-08 Thread Terence Golightly
Alistair, On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 03:21, Alastair Scott wrote: > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 03:11, Terence Golightly wrote: > > > I tried to use a 95 boot disk to run the firmware upgrade. I got the > > same message to the effect that the archive won't execute in dos mode. > > In other words, the utili

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-08 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday 07 February 2004 8:11 pm, Terence Golightly wrote: > > I tried to use a 95 boot disk to run the firmware upgrade. I got the > same message to the effect that the archive won't execute in dos mode. > > thanks, > > Terry > OK, I have no clue wh

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-07 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday 06 February 2004 6:48 pm, Terence Golightly wrote: > > > > > Yes there is an upgrade available. > > > > Then I suggest you use it. Depending of course whether Plextor states > > that it's to make the drive compatible with larger blanks, or for

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-05 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday 05 February 2004 7:33 pm, Terence Golightly wrote: > Charlie, > > try this: > Yes there is an upgrade available. Then I suggest you use it. Depending of course whether Plextor states that it's to make the drive compatible with larger blank

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-05 Thread Terence Golightly
Charlie, try this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] terryg]$ cdrecord -atip dev=0,0,0 Cdrecord 2.0 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 Jörg Schilling scsidev: '0,0,0' scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24 Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' Device type: Removable CD-ROM Ve

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 05 February 2004 17:35, Charlie Mahan wrote: > > The first thing I would do with any older CD-R/RW is check the > manufacturer's site to find whether there's a firmware update > available. That's the easy way to ensure capability of larger > capacity disks. ignsize can be dangerous beca

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-05 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday 05 February 2004 2:58 am, John Richard Smith wrote: > Terence Golightly wrote: > > re-examining the man page to cdrecord and choosing the -ignsize option. I > > burned, I see files, I happy!!! > > > >Cheers to all, > > > >Terry > > That's righ

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-05 Thread John Richard Smith
Terence Golightly wrote: re-examining the man page to cdrecord and choosing the -ignsize option. I burned, I see files, I happy!!! Cheers to all, Terry That's right , unless you specify differently cdrecord, as I understand it , assumes your media size is 650MB, but as long as you take care

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-04 Thread Terence Golightly
Well here I am replying to my own posts. (remember as long as I don't ask myself questions and then answer them I'm.. ok right!) I apparently resolved the issue, but re-examining the man page to cdrecord and choosing the -ignsize option. I burned, I see files, I happy!!! Cheers to all, Terry

Re: [newbie] cdrecord NOT! revisited...oops

2004-02-01 Thread Terence Golightly
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 08:14, Terence Golightly wrote: > List, > > Below is an alias of the command I used in an attempt to burn the mdk > 9.2 install cd iso. When I used mkcd on previous attempts to burn an iso ooops that should read cdrecord or biso alias. Sorry > to discs of questionable