On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:42:11 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 19 January 2004 10:07 am, jason pearl wrote:
>> I htink i am almost there.. I can send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>if i> am sending to the cox smtp servers... but i cannot recieve mail
>from> anyone. it bounce
On Monday 19 January 2004 10:07 am, jason pearl wrote:
> I htink i am almost there.. I can send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if i
> am sending to the cox smtp servers... but i cannot recieve mail from
> anyone. it bounce messages all say that they couldnt contact
> mail.jpearl.org.. i have mx recor
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:14:09 +
Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 19 Jan 2004 3:07 pm, jason pearl wrote:
>> I htink i am almost there.. I can send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>if i> am sending to the cox smtp servers... but i cannot recieve mail
>from> anyone. it bounce messa
On Monday 19 Jan 2004 3:07 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> I htink i am almost there.. I can send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if i
> am sending to the cox smtp servers... but i cannot recieve mail from
> anyone. it bounce messages all say that they couldnt contact
> mail.jpearl.org.. i have mx records se
I htink i am almost there.. I can send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if i
am sending to the cox smtp servers... but i cannot recieve mail from
anyone. it bounce messages all say that they couldnt contact
mail.jpearl.org.. i have mx records setup at my dns as mail.jpearl.org
first
then jpearl.org.
m
On Saturday 17 Jan 2004 1:22 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> telnet> open
> (to) relay-test.mail-abuse.org
> Trying 168.61.4.13...
> Connected to relay-test.mail-abuse.org (168.61.4.13).
> Escape character is '^]'.
> /proj/maps/bin/in.relaytest: socket failed [Bad file descriptor]
> Connecting to 68.99.95
telnet> open
(to) relay-test.mail-abuse.org
Trying 168.61.4.13...
Connected to relay-test.mail-abuse.org (168.61.4.13).
Escape character is '^]'.
/proj/maps/bin/in.relaytest: socket failed [Bad file descriptor]
Connecting to 68.99.95.93 ...
Connection closed by foreign host.
thats what i get.. wh
On Saturday 17 Jan 2004 1:02 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:02:26 -0500
> >Also, once you get the mail server up, you might want to run a quick
> >test to check for open relays.
>
> From the machine telnet to relay-test.mail-abuse.org
>
> i got this when i opened telnet:
>
> telne
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:02:26 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:01 am, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> i can send mail to myself.. i sent an email from
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i can send it to my cox email but not to
>anyone else.> what do i put for mx records at th
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:02:26 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:01 am, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> i can send mail to myself.. i sent an email from
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i can send it to my cox email but not to
>anyone else.> what do i put for mx records at th
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:06:33 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:17 pm, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> I never bet a bounce back and nobody can telnet to me even with my
>> router port opened so i guess the outgoing 25 is blocked? so does
>that> mean incoming is
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:06:33 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:17 pm, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> I never bet a bounce back and nobody can telnet to me even with my
>> router port opened so i guess the outgoing 25 is blocked? so does
>that> mean incoming is
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:56:19 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>newbie
hello
--
jason pearl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
++
"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer"-Tupac
++
Kurrupted Visionz Phx, AZregistered linux user #307811
MDK 9.2 L
On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:17 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> I never bet a bounce back and nobody can telnet to me even with my
> router port opened so i guess the outgoing 25 is blocked? so does that
> mean incoming is blocked also?
Jason, I just did some research to try to clear this up. Accordi
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:56:19 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:01 am, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> i can send mail to myself.. i sent an email from
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> i can send it to my cox email but not to
>anyone else.> what do i put for mx records at th
On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:01 am, jason pearl wrote:
> i can send mail to myself.. i sent an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i can send it to my cox email but not to anyone else.
> what do i put for mx records at the no-ip account? i put my cox mx
> records.
Also, once you get the mail server
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:32:22 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 14 January 2004 07:28 pm, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> So did you have to pay extra to(im assuming homelinux is dyndns.org)
>get> them to reroute mail? I would rather have my own mail server then
>to use> cox cabl
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 07:28 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> So did you have to pay extra to(im assuming homelinux is dyndns.org) get
> them to reroute mail? I would rather have my own mail server then to use
> cox cable. thanks
Depends on how much you want to depend on it. I don't pay extra and
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:21:19 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 14 January 2004 07:32 am, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> do you have to pay to use that domain name to get it through.. is
>your> port 25 blocked???
>
>No. My port 25 IS blocked, at least for outgoing traffic on po
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 07:32 am, jason pearl wrote:
> do you have to pay to use that domain name to get it through.. is your
> port 25 blocked???
No. My port 25 IS blocked, at least for outgoing traffic on port 25 So, I
have to smarthost my mail through my ISP, basically, Postfix relays
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:03:26 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 January 2004 11:40 pm, jason pearl wrote:
>
>> so should we get this email...
>
>After the recent discussion concerning anti-spam measures, I got to
>thinking that I might have figured out why the Mandrake m
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 11:40 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> so should we get this email...
After the recent discussion concerning anti-spam measures, I got to thinking
that I might have figured out why the Mandrake mailing-list server was
dropping my emails when they originated from my postfix sy
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:38:05 -0500
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just testing to see if the smarthost relay problems that I had
>previously have been fixed yet. If not, this message should never
>appear.--
>Bryan Phinney
>Software Test Engineer
>
>
so should we get this email...
--
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 09:32:47 -0400
Bryan Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a test message. For some reason, my messages to the list are not
> appearing (or at least I can't see them). This is a test to see if an
> alternate transport helps.
Gotcha here dude,
Ralph
--
http://axljab.
On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 05:20, Vinh N. Pham wrote:
> Sorry this is a test message
Sorry, the email didn't work; you'll have to try again! (g)
--
Sat Apr 5 06:00:01 EST 2003
06:00:01 up 14 days, 17:47, 3 users, load average: 0.78, 0.57, 0.47
-
Coming through fine.
--
Warren Post
Santa Rosa de Copan, Honduras
http://www.srcopan.vze.com/
On 15 May 2002 14:10:07 -0400
"Terry S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a test message everyone ..
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 08:10 pm, Terry S. wrote:
> Just a test message everyone .. seems I've been having problems sending
> messages to here on this email server, and wanted to see if anyone
> really was getting them.
>
> Thanks, and carry on!
>
> Terry
Read you loud and clear, Terry.
Kaj Hau
Mark, they're getting through. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Newbie List
Subject: [newbie] test message
cause they're not getting through. damn mailservers~!
--
daRcmaTTeR
On Friday 22 February 2002 16:03, you wrote:
> I asked you NOT to read this. I only sent it because I've been having a
> problem getting messages to the list from my mailserver at work.
>
> but you've gone and done it now...
>
> i can't begin to tell you the terrible pains that shall now befall yo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:17:38 -0500
"Anuerin G. Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
>
> yeah, that hit me after a few days. thank i dont filter it to /dev/null but to the
>trash folder. it fills up but at least i dont get to see the message as i can just
>throw t
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:49:57 -0500
"Anuerin G. Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:02:40 -0500
> Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:10:07 +1100
> > Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these w
yeah, that hit me after a few days. thank i dont filter it to /dev/null but to the
trash folder. it fills up but at least i dont get to see the message as i can just
throw the buggers out with all the trashmails. the only reason im suggesting it is
that some still access through dial-ups and t
considering the nature of the internet, the fact that i would rather do it
myself (please mom), the great deal of cash we expend to be on this list, I
would suggest that control is almost always better if _I_ control it, so for
those reasons I would suggest a "local" filter would be a better ch
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 03:04 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:10:07 +1100
>
> Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed frantically in their message:
> > I just got a message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but then it also
> > showed up in the newbie list as intended. What give
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:33:12 -0600
"Roy Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed frantically in their message:
> yeah tell me bout it.. one of mine got retruned for language content when all i had
>in it was the word 'crap'.. lol. and then it shows up in the list .. after i edited
>it and sent it ag
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:10:07 +1100
Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed frantically in their message:
> I just got a message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but then it also
> showed up in the newbie list as intended. What gives?
>
> ...and this message from you Mark, was received twice as
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:08:21 -0500
"Anuerin G. Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
>
> hey mark, maybe something is wrong with your mail connection. i have just returned
>from a 3 day vacation and i got around 400 emails in my mailbox. got it all processed
>out
it's OK!
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] test message
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:27:08 -0500
> Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:27:08 -0500
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> hello? is this thing on???
>
> no message at home for a while and posts from both home and office not
> showing up although a small trickle coming in to the office.
>
> Mark
>
>
geez
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:10:07 +1100
Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> I just got a message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but then it also
> showed up in the newbie list as intended. What gives?
>
> ...and this message from you Mark, was received twice
running M$ Exchange.. lol
roy
- Original Message -
From:
Brian
Parish
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001
2310
Subject: Re: [newbie] test message
I just got a message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but then it
also showed up in the newb
I just got a message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED], but then it also
showed up in the newbie list as intended. What gives?
...and this message from you Mark, was received twice as have lots of others.
Looks like we have a mailer with the hiccups somewhere.
Brian
On Friday 14 December 2001
hey mark, maybe something is wrong with your mail connection. i have just returned
from a 3 day vacation and i got around 400 emails in my mailbox. got it all processed
out by deleting all the samba, nvidia, and whos gary threads. with that number of
emails, i figured they got it sorted out so
Same goes for here until today (7/29). was there some kind of server
problem???
- Original Message -
From: Joe Brault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:52 AM
Subject: [newbie] test message
> Hello all,
>
>
> I haven't received mail from thi
Joe Brault wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I haven't received mail from this list in several days... Am I still
> subscribed to it? Is it still in operation? Hello? :) Can someone fill
> me in... Thanks...
>
> - Joe :)
>
> --
> | Have you petted your
I'd say the lists are working fine.
--
Mail sent from:
--
609 linux-mandrake.com
At 10:52 AM 7/27/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>
>I haven't received mail from t
46 matches
Mail list logo
