Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-12 Thread ed tharp
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 23:47, rikona wrote: > Hello Heather/Femme, > > Thursday, September 11, 2003, 10:44:15 AM, you wrote: > > HF> Have to agree with Anne. Till linux becomes more pervasive, ppl > HF> who can only turn the comp on & nothing else (and most don't want > HF> to know more) won't us

Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-11 Thread Heather/Femme
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:47:15 -0700 rikona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Heather/Femme, > > HF> For now, seeing seniors use linux or any segment of the population > HF> that is of the mindset a comp shold be like a toaster (it just > HF> works), is a pipe dream. > > Actually, The seniors I k

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-11 Thread rikona
Hello Heather/Femme, Thursday, September 11, 2003, 10:44:15 AM, you wrote: HF> Have to agree with Anne. Till linux becomes more pervasive, ppl HF> who can only turn the comp on & nothing else (and most don't want HF> to know more) won't use linux nor is it feasible for them to be HF> using it.

Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-11 Thread Michael Adams
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:03:42 -0700 rikona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello robin, > > Sunday, September 7, 2003, 1:17:15 PM, you wrote: > > r> There is also the factor that the average Linux sysadmin is a lot > r> more savvy than a point-and-click NT sysadmin. > > And both are almost infinitel

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-09 Thread rikona
Hello robin, Sunday, September 7, 2003, 1:17:15 PM, you wrote: r> There is also the factor that the average Linux sysadmin is a lot r> more savvy than a point-and-click NT sysadmin. And both are almost infinitely more savvy than the new XP user, sitting on the net with no firewall, no AV program

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus - let's go over this again, shall we?u

2003-09-07 Thread rikona
Hello ed, Sunday, September 7, 2003, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote: et> you know, I would not want to be a manager for McAfee tho... et> trying to 'work with M$' on a Corp. level must be a real nerve et> racking experience. If you want to 'work with M$' on a Corp. level, you first need to turn around a

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus - let's go over this again, shall we?u

2003-09-07 Thread rikona
Hello David, Sunday, September 7, 2003, 9:51:37 AM, you wrote: DEF> So two morals -- don't use Outhouse, and don't put mailing list DEF> email addresses in your contacts. If you don't use OE, then it might be OK to use a contact list. For example, TheBat email client uses its own list, in a diff

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-07 Thread rikona
Hello Russ, Sunday, September 7, 2003, 7:45:44 AM, you wrote: R> I was having a discussion with an avid Mac user about viruses. He R> claims there are no viruses for Macs because of the built in R> security features (Mac is also a Unix based system like Linux). R> The Mac OS does have a huge fo

Re[2]: [newbie] Virus

2003-09-07 Thread rikona
Hello ed, Sunday, September 7, 2003, 6:45:13 AM, you wrote: et> ahh NO! et> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/ Sounds good. Is this going to be included in Mandrake? Killer system if it is. -- rikonamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandr

Re: [Re[2]: [newbie] VIRUS... If it got you....]

2000-03-04 Thread Michael Scottaline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - > Attachment: Body > MIME Type: text/plain > - == Really funny Ty :o) BTW, I meant to ask earlier, Why does the body of your mes

Re[2]: [newbie] VIRUS... If it got you....

2000-03-03 Thread tymanthius
I also saw one at work (I do telephone tech support) 2 days ago: Boot to windows and you get a message that reads something like this: Kanga ANTI-Ko$oft says "Not Today" And you get no further. I have no idea how it's transmited, but thought the dual booters would like the info. Ty C. Mixon F