James Carlson wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>
>> It is indeed derailed.
>>
>> What's the status after derailing? waiting need spec? waiting need
>> meeting?
>>
>
> Using "waiting need spec" is traditional, assuming no other
> information. The project team should be notified that the
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:21 AM, James Walker
wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Drew Fisher. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man page and pydoc has been posted in the
> materials directory.
>
>
>
> Interfaces
> ==
>
> ? ? ? ?Exported Interfaces ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Xue Wei wrote:
> Hi, I'm filing this case as a self review and automatic approval. If you
> have any comments, please let me know by the end of one week.
> After one week, it will be approved automatically.
You didn't actually file it as an ARC case, but that's okay, since there
are no interfaces
Hi Danek,
I have updated the prototype_com file to just have Python version 2.6 in it.
Below are the contains of the file.
d none usr 0755 root sys
d none usr/share 0755 root sys
d none usr/lib 0755 root bin
d none usr/lib/python2.6 0755 root bin
d none usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages 0755 root
Hi James,
Please see my in-line comments below.
cheers,
Simon
James Carlson wrote:
> Simon Sun writes:
>
>> James Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> What (if anything) will be done with the existing SIP library and SIP
>>> proxy that are already in OpenSolaris?
>>>
>> Nothing needed for the cu
Hi Charles,
You can fine the Javadocs for drools at
/workarea/yoda_export/Calsoft-ws3/usr/src/lib/drools/drools-4.0.7/dist/javad
oc
location on yoda-ks.central.sun.com setup.
Let me know if this works for you.
Best Regards,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From: Charles.Binford
Christopher Kirby wrote:
> On May 12, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>> Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>>> C.2. Version Compatibility
>>> Using these features does not require a pool upgrade.
>>> Snapshots created on earlier pool versions will be eligible
>>> for user reference counts and will
Margot Miller wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I am derailing this case as it misses the non-controversial requirement
> for a fast track and would like an email vote on this case by
> Friday May 15th.
>
> My impression from today's meeting was that LSARC will have
> a future case that will address the issue
Worth noting:
'man' pages are wholly inadequate to document some jar files; one
would be in the awkward position of enumerating all the classes, and
possibly all the methods/constants in those classes.
There are jar files that are nothing but interfaces, some that are
interfaces and code, s
"how do we communicate the interface classification of a jar file"
This is a multi-level.
Plenty of jar files contain classes or classes with methods and other
stuff which is not intended for public consumption. Simply because
somthing is "public" or "protected" is not a good way to assume i
Garrett D'Amore writes:
> It is indeed derailed.
>
> What's the status after derailing? waiting need spec? waiting need
> meeting?
Using "waiting need spec" is traditional, assuming no other
information. The project team should be notified that the way forward
is to send mail to psarc-agenda
In GlassFish V3, here is what I'm doing (one example). I've created
the annotation @Taxonomy, which takes a value of type Stability. This
is what it looks like in the Javadoc. One can click through the
annotation and see the actual definition of the stability level.
This is available at t
The case hasn't been denied; it's been derailed so an opinion can be
written and it will be clear if precedence has been set or not with this
case.
From the LSARC meeting today, it seemed like the majority of
the committee thought it was fine for the project team and other
teams to ship a man pa
I will retarget for python 2.6.
-Drew
John Fischer wrote:
> Correct. The latest Python release within Solaris is version 2.6. The
> other versions (2.4 and 2.5) are deprecated. See PSARC 2009/043 for
> details. I have included a short quote from the description section of
> that case.
>
> Th
Hey All,
I am derailing this case as it misses the non-controversial requirement
for a fast track and would like an email vote on this case by
Friday May 15th.
My impression from today's meeting was that LSARC will have
a future case that will address the issue of how to publicize interface
class
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> Thanks Garrett, Peter, Seb and Gary, for your review and
>> the comments for the case. We'll look into the concerns
>> that brought up and see what we can do.
>>
>
> I thought Garrett derailed. Yet it still seems to have
> a waiting fast-track status. Garr
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:22:32AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:40:42PM +0530, Vivek Titarmare wrote:
>
> > I have updated the prototype_com file to just have Python version 2.6 in
> > it. Below are the contains of the file.
>
> Looks fine to me.
Actually, I was wron
> Thanks Garrett, Peter, Seb and Gary, for your review and
> the comments for the case. We'll look into the concerns
> that brought up and see what we can do.
I thought Garrett derailed. Yet it still seems to have
a waiting fast-track status. Garrett, if it is derailed,
Correct. The latest Python release within Solaris is version 2.6. The
other versions (2.4 and 2.5) are deprecated. See PSARC 2009/043 for
details. I have included a short quote from the description section of
that case.
Thanks,
John
Python 2.6 and 3.0 are not fully compatible with the
>
> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
> > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> > 1. Introduction
> >1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
> > nfswatch
>
Thanks Garrett, Peter, Seb and Gary, for your review and
the comments for the case. We'll look
On May 12, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>> C.2. Version Compatibility
>> Using these features does not require a pool upgrade.
>> Snapshots created on earlier pool versions will be eligible
>> for user reference counts and will be treated as if their
>> initial
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> C.2. Version Compatibility
>
> Using these features does not require a pool upgrade.
> Snapshots created on earlier pool versions will be eligible
> for user reference counts and will be treated as if their
> initial reference count is zero.
> C.4.2.1. Delegated Administra
Simon Sun writes:
> By default, the port 5060 is for SIP use. If two instances of one SIP
> proxy were started up, the latter one should fail since the default port
> has been occupied by the first instance. Same thing will happen to the
> two different proxies. It has nothing do with the libra
The file drools_javadoc.tar has been placed in the fasttrack.materials
directory.
Can we close this case now?
-- mark
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> You can fine the Javadocs for drools at
>
> /workarea/yoda_export/Calsoft-ws3/usr/src/lib/drools/drools-4.0.7/dist/javad
> oc
>
> locatio
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:40:42PM +0530, Vivek Titarmare wrote:
> I have updated the prototype_com file to just have Python version 2.6 in
> it. Below are the contains of the file.
Looks fine to me.
Danek
25 matches
Mail list logo
