prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

This case has timed out and is thereby approved. -jg

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Cyril Plisko wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jerry Gilliam >> wrote: >> >>> >>> - Output of 'prtconf -d' >>> * Actual PCI vendor ID and device ID on X86: >>> pci1028,214 (pciex8086,105e), instance

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jerry Gilliam wrote: > > >- Output of 'prtconf -d' > * Actual PCI vendor ID and device ID on X86: >pci1028,214 (pciex8086,105e), instance #0 > * and on SPARC: >network (pciex8086,105e), instance #0 > I thin

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:56:45AM -0800, Wesley Shao wrote: > > I guess we are going from counter intuitive to livable. Please file an > RFE on this so we can go from livable to user friendly. I wonder if the > PCI database parsing code can be leveraged. HTML e-mail on these lists is barely liva

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:35:03AM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Cyril Plisko wrote: > >>>- Output of 'prtconf -vd' > >>> > >>>* Actual PCI vendor ID and device ID on X86: > >>> pci1028,214 (pciex8086,105e [Intel 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet > >>>Controller]), instance #0 > >>>* and on SPARC:

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >> Cyril Plisko wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jerry Gilliam >>> wrote: >>> >>> - Output of 'prtconf -d' * Actual PCI vendor ID and device ID on X86:

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Cyril Plisko wrote: >> >> I think that in many cases the next step would be to manually search >> in various tables what the actual device is. So why not do one more >> step and lookup these numbers in /usr/share/hwdata/pci.ids ? Perhaps, >> while combined with -v? > > See

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Jerry Gilliam > wrote: > >>- Output of 'prtconf -d' >> * Actual PCI vendor ID and device ID on X86: >>pci1028,214 (pciex8086,105e), instance #0 >> * and on SPARC: >>network (pciex808

prtconf PCI Vendor and Device Ids option [PSARC/2009/057 02/05/2009]

I am sponsoring the following case on behalf of Judy Chen and Wesley Shao as a fast-track, with timeout February 5, 2009. The project desires micro/patch binding. 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: Add -d option for 'prtconf' 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier