Friends, if anyone has access to a niagara and can test this patch which I
created to provide for engine(3) support for flood. Flood is a profile driven
http load tester from the Apache Software Foundation. It is threaded and thus
unlike ab can take advantage of the niagara architecture. The rea
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sch> I think I would like to hear about how to eventually close some
> sch> of the program-wide aliases, as consolidations and communities
> sch> evolve their own code submission discussions
Michelle:
I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with the
projects. That's where the conversations and collaboration are taking place. I
do agree that there should be a top-level link to docs from the opensolaris.org
home page.
-Sue
This message posted from openso
Jumping in...from the docs community perspective, it would be great to
have a repository for technical design documentation as proposed here.
Documentation (design, arc, admin, user, dev, etc.) cuts across the
whole of the OpenSolaris project and should be a top-level item when
you arrive at op
Check out Ben Rockwwod's little intro to [i]cdrw[/i] here: http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=244";>http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=244
Or here is another guide for using [i]cdrecord[/i]: http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~pcs/apps/solaris_cdr_burning.html";>http://www.p
Then you'ld have to define "OS." The official definition of the
Solaris Operating System is the entire WOS, from kernel through desktop
and servers,
all the consolidations, so presumably you're thinking of the subset of ON
that's not networking. Maybe "Core OS" or something?
Yes, core OS -
Eric Lowe wrote:
So let me propose:
- Rename and refactor the 'onnv' community into 'os-net' or some
such. Remove its logical binding to the nevada release train.
There is already a separate community for networking, so if we go that
route I think this community should jus
Thanks, Jonathan. Eric will get you guys set up.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Adams writes:
I'd like to add a libumem project, underneath the Performance and Modular
Debugger communities.
Seconded.
liane
___
opensolaris-discuss maili
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 3/16/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe and Robert Milkowski for these two bug fixes below
and to Sarah Jelinek and Darren Moffat for sponsoring the fixes through
to putback. Also note that Robert's led to an ARC case.
Will this PSARC case
On 3/16/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoff writes:
> > Hi, I was just wondering how to configure Solaris 10 to watch dvds
>
> Both mplayer and ogle are available from Blastwave.
sorry for the dark image :
http://www.blastwave.org/articles/KDE-0002/mplayer.png
That was from
Mike Kupfer wrote:
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created
..
I'd like to see opensolaris-bugs and opensolaris-rfe go away, too. Bugs
and RFEs should get posted to the bug database, not mailing lists.
Agreed.
- Eric
_
So let me propose:
- Rename and refactor the 'onnv' community into 'os-net' or some
such. Remove its logical binding to the nevada release train.
There is already a separate community for networking, so if we go that
route I think this community should just be for the OS par
Jonathan Adams writes:
> I'd like to add a libumem project, underneath the Performance and Modular
> Debugger communities.
Seconded.
liane
--
Liane Praza, Solaris Kernel Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blogs.sun.com/lianep
___
opensolaris-dis
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> I think I would like to hear about how to eventually close some
sch> of the program-wide aliases, as consolidations and communities
sch> evolve their own code submission discussions.
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It
Things were setup that way before projects existed and everything had to be
a community. The "Nevada" community (which is misnamed to begin with),
should
become a ONNV project of an ON community which could also host your
internals
information.
... and proposed discussion list(s).
Agreed,
I'd like to add a libumem project, underneath the Performance and Modular
Debugger communities.
The project would include:
1. discussion of libumem(3lib) work in progress / future work
2. pointers to ports of libumem to other systems
3. documenting the use of libumem and its MDB dc
On Thu 16 Mar 2006 at 02:19PM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 12:37]:
> > On Thu 03/16/06 at 11:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 2. What is the relationship between this community and the existing ON
> > > (Nevada) community? Why is that alias
Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
2. What is the relationship between this community and the existing ON
(Nevada) community? Why is that alias, or a second alias (or
project) not appropriate for hosting this content? (Why not
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Nevada community seems to be shooting
* Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 14:19]:
> My concern here was more connected with the fact that these
> "grandfathered" aliases exist and overlap (to whatever degree). I
> think I would like to hear about how to eventually close some of the
> program-wide aliases, as consoli
* Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 12:37]:
> On Thu 03/16/06 at 11:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 2. What is the relationship between this community and the existing ON
> > (Nevada) community? Why is that alias, or a second alias (or
> > project) not appropriate
Geoff writes:
> Hi, I was just wondering how to configure Solaris 10 to watch dvds
Both mplayer and ogle are available from Blastwave.
> that I put in my dvd r+-rw and also does Solaris 10 have a built in burning
> utility for cds and dvds?
Two of 'em -- cdrw and cdrecord.
--
James Carlson, K
Hi, I was just wondering how to configure Solaris 10 to watch dvds that I put
in my dvd r+-rw and also does Solaris 10 have a built in burning utility for
cds and dvds? I am a Solaris 10 newbie, thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
open
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 13:29 -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
>
> > As a side note: for Linux kernel this code "separation" will *never*
> > work since Linux and its development team doesn't care about such a
> > drivers. Maintaining separated drivers for Linux ker
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
> As a side note: for Linux kernel this code "separation" will *never*
> work since Linux and its development team doesn't care about such a
> drivers. Maintaining separated drivers for Linux kernel is extremely
> painful work and requires a lot of workers
On Thu 03/16/06 at 11:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I believe this proposal needs to provide further contrasts against
> existing communities and projects to make aspects more clear.
> (As a nit, the bare word "solaris" is not an appropriate part for a
> community name. I'm also not
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Sean Sprague wrote:
> Chandan B.N. wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
> >> Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
> >
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/chandanlog/76005188/ ?
Reformatted.
> Very nice indeed! Just one
On 3/16/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to Rich Lowe and Robert Milkowski for these two bug fixes below
> and to Sarah Jelinek and Darren Moffat for sponsoring the fixes through
> to putback. Also note that Robert's led to an ARC case.
Will this PSARC case be published on ope
I believe this proposal needs to provide further contrasts against
existing communities and projects to make aspects more clear.
opensolaris-discuss is too broad an audience for internals discussions.
opensolaris-code I thought was meant to cover code topics and questions,
but has been ove
Thanks to Rich Lowe and Robert Milkowski for these two bug fixes below
and to Sarah Jelinek and Darren Moffat for sponsoring the fixes through
to putback. Also note that Robert's led to an ARC case.
Putback #44
ID: 62217306
Desc: ufs_log mdb module needs to be merged with the ufs one
Submitted
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
I am filling in my document tree there.
Feel free to let me know if its lame, cool, okay or any comments at all.
We need a name for the DVD and the "3" paradigm should be dropped as
quickly as possible. We will most likely have a half dozen in anothe
Rich!
BTW, +1 on the Band of Brothers rename. Imagine the look on someone's
face when they walk into Future SHop for a Band of Brithers DVD, and
get handed an OpenSOlaris DVD! :-)
You've cracked it! The OpenSolaris DVD should be called "Band of Brithers"!
Well done lad ;-)
Sean.
__
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:22 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:49 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > > GPL as a standalone driver written to the Solaris DDI shouldn't
> > > be a problem as long as it stays under the GPL. However t
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> ps: perhaps someone can drop a line to some T-shirt mass producer and
> see if we can get this lined up.
I have a friend in the advertising specialities business. Supplying
printed shirts and the like is what he does, so with some more info,
I could as
Well, I suppose the Three Amigos wouldn't fly either huh?
T
+1
Band of Brothers was really just a project name...not the real thing.
LKR
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 3/16/06, Sean Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
All three OpenSolaris Distro'
* Nils Nieuwejaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-16 10:49]:
> We would like to propose a solaris-internals community. The initial
> leaders would be Jonathan Chew, Eric Lowe, Eric Saxe, and me. We hope to
> expand this list quickly, with engineers from inside of Sun and from the
> community.
>
> T
On Thu 03/16/06 at 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
> >The solaris-internals community would host one or more discussion groups.
> >Initially there would just be a single group: solaris-internals. If the
> >traffic warranted, we could create more specific discussions wit
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Tony Austman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was referring to GNU/Solaris distributions like Nexenta, Belenix and Schillix.
SchilliX is no GNU/Solaris distribution as only a minority of the
complete code from SchilliX is covered by the GPL.
I asume that similar st
On 3/16/06, Sean Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On 3/16/06, Chandan B.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
> >>> Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/c
Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
The solaris-internals community would host one or more discussion groups.
Initially there would just be a single group: solaris-internals. If the
traffic warranted, we could create more specific discussions within the
group. Some possible child discussions might be solari
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 3/16/06, Chandan B.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chandanlog/76005188/ ?
Oh come on ! Now thats a slick DVD cover ri
Chandan B.N. wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chandanlog/76005188/ ?
Very nice indeed! Just one small point: the word "Nexenta" is rather small in comparison to the gr
On 3/16/06, Chandan B.N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
> > Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/chandanlog/76005188/ ?
>
Oh come on ! Now thats a slick DVD cover right there !
Den
We would like to propose a solaris-internals community. The initial
leaders would be Jonathan Chew, Eric Lowe, Eric Saxe, and me. We hope to
expand this list quickly, with engineers from inside of Sun and from the
community.
There are quite a few communities dedicated to specific parts of Solari
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:11 +, Sean Sprague wrote:
> Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chandanlog/76005188/ ?
-Chandan
--
https://blogs.sun.com/chandan
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
+1
Band of Brothers was really just a project name...not the real thing.
LKR
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 3/16/06, Sean Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
All three OpenSolaris Distro's on one DVD along with everything else
that one would want.
On 3/16/06, Sean Sprague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > All three OpenSolaris Distro's on one DVD along with everything else
> > that one would want.
>
> Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
>
We need to drop this nice moniker "Band of Brother
Dennis Clarke wrote:
All three OpenSolaris Distro's on one DVD along with everything else
that one would want.
Has Chandan done the artwork for the Band of Brothers t-shirt yet?
Sean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
On 3/16/06, Laura Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Or, do you have any action items that other folks in community could
> help you to get this over the finish line...your postscript said it all!
> Tell us how / what to do to help.
Get a technically gripped guy to help me with a step by step "
On 3/16/06, Jens Siebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Laura Ramsey wrote:
> >
> > Dennis:
> >
> > got an update on the Band of Brothers DVD? Once you have the ISO up on
> > Blastwave, and the installation guide is set, we can start the
> > production phase of the project:
> >
> > 1--Sara can start
LOL--yes, not associated with the TV show. (which was great.)
It is a DVD of Bellinix, Schillix and Nexenta distros of OpenSolaris.
Stay tuned. Dennis Clarke is working on locking in the ISO...and it will
be coming to a blastwave download center near you!
;)
LKR
Jens Siebert wrote:
Laura R
Laura Ramsey wrote:
Dennis:
got an update on the Band of Brothers DVD? Once you have the ISO up on
Blastwave, and the installation guide is set, we can start the
production phase of the project:
1--Sara can start whipping up the DVD cover art in inserts...
2--We can figure out best timing f
Or, do you have any action items that other folks in community could
help you to get this over the finish line...your postscript said it all!
Tell us how / what to do to help.
Sara can collaborate with you on art. No worries there.
LKR
Stephen Lau wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Got an ETA on when
Tony Austman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was referring to GNU/Solaris distributions like Nexenta, Belenix and
> Schillix.
SchilliX is no GNU/Solaris distribution as only a minority of the
complete code from SchilliX is covered by the GPL.
I asume that similar statements could be given for Be
On 3/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> Got an ETA on when the DVD would be ready? I'm heading down to the
> FISL conference in April, and I'd love to burn a whole bunch of these
> DVDs and bring them with me.
I wanted them ready for this Monday :-(
As in two da
Hi Dennis,
Got an ETA on when the DVD would be ready? I'm heading down to the
FISL conference in April, and I'd love to burn a whole bunch of these
DVDs and bring them with me.
cheers,
steve
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 3/16/06, Laura Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis:
got an update o
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The real problem that I see is that people may call OpenSolaris a GPL
violating project even though there is no reason that would stand a
case on court.
Can we have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] please?
BTW the "viral" part of the GPL is in the CDDL as well, the main
difference
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, IANAL, but it seems to me that one can't GPL magic numbers or
> > algorithms, so provided that you don't use any of the GPLed code, I
> > think you should be OK.
>
> I am not sure about the US Copyrigh
On 3/16/06, MaTianyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can i use it on solaris10 x86
see : http://www.blastwave.org/
Mono 1.1.13.4 Released for Solaris by Jonel Rienton at Blastwave
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discu
MaTianyi wrote:
can i use it on solaris10 x86
You can grab the Solaris 10 version from http://www.blastwave.org/
Regards,
Moinak.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
can i use it on solaris10 x86
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 3/16/06, Laura Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dennis:
>
> got an update on the Band of Brothers DVD?
In short, yes. Still working on it.
> Once you have the ISO up on
> Blastwave, and the installation guide is set, we can start the
> production phase of the project:
>
> 1--Sara can
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > case-by-case open source legal review process for incoming code.
>
> Not all code is "incoming", some is simply "out there". E.g. one question
> that
> comes up over and over again is: for a 100% GPL driver, available from the
> author's web pag
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:49 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > GPL as a standalone driver written to the Solaris DDI shouldn't
> > be a problem as long as it stays under the GPL. However there isn't
> > much change of that becoming part of the official Ope
Dennis:
got an update on the Band of Brothers DVD? Once you have the ISO up on
Blastwave, and the installation guide is set, we can start the
production phase of the project:
1--Sara can start whipping up the DVD cover art in inserts...
2--We can figure out best timing for the first run (and
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GPL as a standalone driver written to the Solaris DDI shouldn't
> be a problem as long as it stays under the GPL. However there isn't
> much change of that becoming part of the official OpenSolaris source
> tree unless someone discovers how to combine
Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, IANAL, but it seems to me that one can't GPL magic numbers or
> algorithms, so provided that you don't use any of the GPLed code, I
> think you should be OK.
I am not sure about the US Copyright system. In Europe, an algorithm would
most likely be too
Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PM> Eric Enright wrote:
> >> I'm currently looking at porting a certain Linux driver to Solaris'
> >> usbser/GSD framework, and am concerned about GPL/CDDL conflicts. I
> >> know that a typical port would not be allowed, however my intent is to
> >> o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Eric Enright wrote:
> >> I'm currently looking at porting a certain Linux driver to Solaris'
> >> usbser/GSD framework, and am concerned about GPL/CDDL conflicts. I
> >> know that a typical port would not be allowed, however my intent is to
> >> only use the magic nu
You need to install Apache::Registry from CPAN, it isn't included by default
with mod_perl.
Log in as root and run /usr/perl5/bin/cpan, answer the configuration questions
and then run 'i Apache::Registry'
--
Alan Burlison
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
69 matches
Mail list logo
