UNIX admin wrote:
> [...]
>> GNOME is bloat to those who don't use it.
>>
>
> Could've been statically linked in.
>
Yikes! Are you suggesting static linking of GNOME libraries into
every application!!
How will it be when you have 10 Gnome/GTK apps running and
each of them has a
> One person's bloat is another person's absolutely
> necessary feature;
> bloat is a relative and often abused term.
>
> International language support is bloat to people who
> only deal in or
> speak English.
Could've been statically linked into the installer.
> Assistive technologies for the
I'm running build 70a and I share files with my mac using samba as well.
However, I use the sharemgr gui app to selectively enable/disable sharing of
directories. When you connect to the opensolaris box, what is the path that you
enter in the OS X finder? Since you have "browseable = no" in the
Hmm, I was just able to get it to work. I used the following share
with all the other shares commented out:
[test]
comment = Test Share
path = /export/home/myuser/workspace
valid users = myuser
public = no
writable = yes
Just some ideas: Make sure the path is correct (wether y
> Have you created the smbpasswd file ? Have you entered the passwords using
> smbpasswd ?
Yes, I used 'smbpasswd -a username' + password. I assume that the
smbpasswd file is created at that time. It has on FreeBSD.
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest games
Have you created the smbpasswd file ? Have you entered the passwords using
smbpasswd ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Can you post the smb.conf file you are using on the Solaris machine?
Shure.
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
smb.conf
Description: Binary data
___
opensolaris-di
(bcc'ing opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org and cc'ing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as this discussion really belong there)
Hi Rishabh,
Rishabh Nagendra wrote:
> Many thanks, Erwann.
>
> I copied the BelaniX xorg.conf , and as usual, the installer stopped. So I
> "tricked" the installer by renaming the f
Can you post the smb.conf file you are using on the Solaris machine?
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> In the smb.conf file, did you change the workgroup = MYGROUP to the domain
> that the Mac is in?
We don't have any Windows domain-server, only workgroups. :-) We are
approx. 10 mac- and windows-clients.
I can log into the ZETTA workgroup which is configured on our FreeBSD
samba-service. I conf
In the smb.conf file, did you change the workgroup = MYGROUP to the domain that
the Mac is in?
-ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
Have enabled samba using 'svcadm enable samba' and have copied
/etc/sfw/smb.conf-default to /etc/sfw/smb.conf and have permitted my
local network. But I can't login using my mac os x finder. I can log
into other samba-services (on FreeBSD).
I've used the "build-in" samba service, ie. no re-co
"Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roland> Roland Mainz wrote:
>> Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
>> feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
>> machine...
Roland> ... does anyone have a M4000 or M5000 around to test this
On 02/10/2007, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ok, you know there is a problem with your software
> > when your desktop
> > > box needs more memory than your server, that is
> > just wrong
> >
> > I don't consider it wrong. Your server software has
> > far less resource
> > needs than y
Brandorr wrote:
> Not happening. You only have 1G of storage. Solaris would need some
> serious trimming to fit. (And maybe compression). With 256M of RAM it
> would be crazy.. Here Linux really is the best choice. (The eee on the
> other hand, might be doable).
Even with the default Solaris Expre
> > ok, you know there is a problem with your software
> when your desktop
> > box needs more memory than your server, that is
> just wrong
>
> I don't consider it wrong. Your server software has
> far less resource
> needs than your desktop. It's just a reality.
But I do. Where I come from, it'
16 matches
Mail list logo
