You can use GCC quite easily, just set up this in the Options menu.
But native Sun's compilers produce 2x faster binaries than GCC.
Sun's compilers are state-of-the-art tools (and not only compilers).
Uros
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:48:08 -0500
> From: s
Anon Y Mous wrote:
> the 64-bit wouldn't work either because it required libXm.so.4, which I think
> is inclucded in SXCE but not in OpenSolaris.
libXm.so.4 was added to the IPS repo for OpenSolaris 2009.06. We've
come a long way since 2008.05 and plan to continue making improvements.
--
alanc:
> I don't know about Tuxedo, but I thought a number of people had installed the
> Oracle Database on OpenSolaris 2009.06 - what makes you think it's not
> possible?
One of my sysadmin buddies told me that he couldn't install Oracle 10g on
OpenSolaris Indiana back in November / December o
Igor Korot wrote:
Thanks guys.
2swa: I am actually looking for the C++ IDE that can work with the C++ compiler
and debugger. AFAIK, NetBeans is for the JAVA development...
BTW what is the name of the debugger under OpenSolaris? It's not gdb, right?
The Sun Studio compiler package provides a C
Thanks guys.
2swa: I am actually looking for the C++ IDE that can work with the C++ compiler
and debugger. AFAIK, NetBeans is for the JAVA development...
BTW what is the name of the debugger under OpenSolaris? It's not gdb, right?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, swa,
After the installation on the desktop I see the icon that says: Add More
Software. I was talking about this.
If I understand you correctly you are talking about this:
Open console window and manually run those 2 commands under the root.
Am I right?
Thank you.
P.S.
FWIW,
You may want SUNWmysql51 which is v5.1.30. SUNWmysql is v4.0.24.
-Norm
Steven Acres wrote:
Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, ALL,
I just installed OpenSolaris. Now I would like to install
"subversion" and "mySQL".
However, when opening the repository, I couldn't find both those
packets.
D
Erast wrote:
> Guys, could someone confirm that this schedule is STILL valid?
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
>
> I'm just wondering that because of SXCE drop - what will happen with
> bi-weekly schedule and releases?
The only thing that changes is the line "The SXCE b
Guys, could someone confirm that this schedule is STILL valid?
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I'm just wondering that because of SXCE drop - what will happen with
bi-weekly schedule and releases?
How community will know about stabilization builds, etc?
__
Hi, swa,
After the installation on the desktop I see the icon that says: Add More
Software. I was talking about this.
If I understand you correctly you are talking about this:
Open console window and manually run those 2 commands under the root.
Am I right?
Thank you.
P.S.: I forgot about one
On 12/08/2009, at 8:12 AM, Octave Orgeron wrote:
With the big diff being that Amazon probably does not use AI to
create new instances. They probably just clone a pre-made image. A
little different from a typical environment.
The replication and recovery project the Caiman folks are worki
On 12/08/2009, at 8:08 AM, Octave Orgeron wrote:
I totally agree with you on this. I don't know why Sun doesn't just
make a cut of SXCE and call it Solaris 11. I mean if customers can't
migrate from Solaris to OpenSolaris, then what's the point in a
market where Sun/Oracle needs to turn a p
+--
| On 2009-08-11 14:08:38, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
|
| If we called it "Solaris 11 Alpha" (which we're not, but if we did),
| would you be complaining it was not yet a proven replacement for Solaris 10?
| It's under dev
Andre Lue stated:
< scanpci output (can post full if needed)
<
< pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x0c function 0x00: vendor 0x9005 device 0x0010
< Device unknown
< CardVendor 0x9005 card 0xa180 (Card unknown)
< STATUS0x0290 COMMAND 0x0157
< CLASS 0x01 0x00 0x00 REVISION 0x00
< BIST
Octave Orgeron wrote:
> I don't know why Sun doesn't just make a cut of SXCE and call it Solaris 11.
Because that's a commitment of many millions of dollars to test, release and
then support for many years, digging back into the same patch hole we've
had with Solaris 10 and are trying to escape, n
Anon Y Mous wrote:
> Well, correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think it's possible yet to install
> things like Oracle RDBMS or Oracle Tuxedo on Indiana yet, is it? It's only
> possible to install them on Solaris Express, am I correct? So, to me one of
> the many, many problems with discontinuin
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I send a more detailed description to a security bug, but it seems that I do
> not get a related mail with a Bug ID...
Nope - bugster is designed to never send any mail outside of sun.com for
security bugs, to avoid accidentally making private/embargoed security bugs
pr
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Anon Y Mous wrote:
Red Hat can manage to keep both Fedora and RHEL going at the same time, so why
can't we have SXCE and Indiana at the same time?
The equivalent in our world is Sun producing both OpenSolaris ("Indiana") and
Solaris (currently Solaris 10 updates) - SXC
Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, ALL,
I just installed OpenSolaris. Now I would like to install "subversion" and
"mySQL".
However, when opening the repository, I couldn't find both those packets.
Do I have to install it from the source?
Thank you.
pkg install SUNWsvn ; pkg install SUNWmysql
--
Cheers,
Anon Y Mous wrote:
> Red Hat can manage to keep both Fedora and RHEL going at the same time, so
> why can't we have SXCE and Indiana at the same time?
The equivalent in our world is Sun producing both OpenSolaris ("Indiana") and
Solaris (currently Solaris 10 updates) - SXCE is a third thing, a hy
Hi, ALL,
I just installed OpenSolaris. Now I would like to install "subversion" and
"mySQL".
However, when opening the repository, I couldn't find both those packets.
Do I have to install it from the source?
Thank you.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
With the big diff being that Amazon probably does not use AI to create new
instances. They probably just clone a pre-made image. A little different from a
typical environment.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization
scanpci output (can post full if needed)
pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x0c function 0x00: vendor 0x9005 device 0x0010
Device unknown
CardVendor 0x9005 card 0xa180 (Card unknown)
STATUS0x0290 COMMAND 0x0157
CLASS 0x01 0x00 0x00 REVISION 0x00
BIST 0x80 HEADER 0x00 LATENCY 0x20 CA
I totally agree with you on this. I don't know why Sun doesn't just make a cut
of SXCE and call it Solaris 11. I mean if customers can't migrate from Solaris
to OpenSolaris, then what's the point in a market where Sun/Oracle needs to
turn a profit? It's bad enough that one would have to go back
Need any help guidance anyone has to offer with what going on with an adaptec
2940 uw card in dell 1750 and 1850.
The card works and show up in the dell 1750 fine. The same card nor any drives
attached to it does not show up in the dell 1850 however I see the following
/etc/path_to_inst
"/p...@
>
> Sun is announcing the intent to discontinue
> production of the Solaris
> Express
> Community Edition (SXCE)
IMNSHO, this move is long overdue, but thanks for bringing it to the discussion
forum.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> follow up ...
>
> Always *after* I hit send. :-P
>
> It is possible to use :
>
> len = XmbLookupString(winPtr->inputContext, &eventPtr->xkey,
> Tcl_DStringValue(&buf), len, NULL, &status);
>
>
> but one would think UTF8 is possible.
I didn't see the o
Thanks for the info.
I tried the issued Opensolaris 2009.06 CD media with Fujitsu P8010 and Dell
15n/1545 I personally and it would not install. It installed ok on the HP
s3123w desktop which I own.
In a few weeks at Fry's I can retry the Toshiba A605-P210 on display with the
CD media. I am on
Bryan Allen wrote:
+--
| On 2009-08-11 14:30:50, Shawn Walker wrote:
|
| Peter Tribble wrote:
| >If there was a Solaris 11 based on SXCE released, I would just roll
| >it out and stand a good chance of using its strengt
+--
| On 2009-08-11 14:30:50, Shawn Walker wrote:
|
| Peter Tribble wrote:
| >If there was a Solaris 11 based on SXCE released, I would just roll
| >it out and stand a good chance of using its strengths to increase its
| >
Peter Tribble wrote:
If there was a Solaris 11 based on SXCE released, I would just roll
it out and stand a good chance of using its strengths to increase its
usage. Gain the new technologies, easy to deploy, compatible with
both the software and administrative frameworks we already have.
With Op
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Octave Orgeron wrote:
>
> It does bring up the big question.. how will customers migrate from S10 to
> OpenSolaris?
Will they bother at all? Forcing a change in direction, and forcing new
technologies on customers, will lead customers to evaluate their use
of the
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 11/08/2009, at 10:51 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
I don't think he (?) was referring to data corruption at that level,
more a case of an upgrade or patch breaking a working system. With
Solaris, I always create and apply patches to a new BE, leaving my
current BE unchanged a
Dave Miner wrote:
- No clear method of upgrade from Solaris -> OpenSolaris
There will be some upgrade options provided for Solaris 10 -> Solaris
Next, but there are no plans to do so for OpenSolaris yet.
How about SXCE -> OpenSolaris? There are a lot of us using SXCE on
systems we'd rat
calumb:
> Sun's plan has always been to base the next long term support release
> of Solaris on a suitable snapshot of OpenSolaris. So, modulo anything
> Oracle has in mind, S10 won't be the last Solaris release.
Well, correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think it's possible yet to install
thin
Uros Nedic wrote:
This is just about ON consolidation. When developer wants to build
whole distribution, I do not think it'll be so easy.
If you have specific issues with building any consolidations, I suggest
raising them in the appropriate communities. All consolidations are
beginning to w
This is just about ON consolidation. When developer wants to build
whole distribution, I do not think it'll be so easy.
Anyway, thank you for tips.
Uros Nedic
Belgrade, Serbia
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:35:08 +1200
> From: glynn.fos...@sun.com
> Subject
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 11/08/2009, at 9:23 AM, Uros Nedic wrote:
I hope before you stop releasing SXCE you'll provide all
tools to build OpenSolaris from source code on OpenSolaris platform.
As far as I know today is very hard to build OpenSolaris distribution
on OpenSolaris even if we have
Roman Naumenko wrote:
Are you sure it's the same? I see strange behavior: no auto-login, reboot on
itself without a reason... The hardware remains the same.
Yes. You can verify the md5 sums if you like:
http://genunix.org/distributions/indiana/osol-0811-hashes.txt
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
__
Are you sure it's the same? I see strange behavior: no auto-login, reboot on
itself without a reason... The hardware remains the same.
--
Roman
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensol
casper@sun.com wrote:
> Yeah, that's clearly broken. Who wrote and who reviewed the fix?
There is a complex mesh of problems and this is partially inherited from Linux.
I send a more detailed description to a security bug, but it seems that I do
not get a related mail with a Bug ID...
It
Kewl Eugene wrote:
Maybe I'm doing it wrong. What I did was
1) Boot the OpenSolaris 2009.06 media I got at the O'Reilly Open Source
Convention a couple of weeks ago on my HP s3123w Amd64 Desktop.
2) Installed OpenSolaris onto a Sandisk 4GB USB Drive
3) Tested the Sandisk USB drive and it succ
Mark Martin wrote:
...
What would it take to document the recipe for building SXCE, such that
interested /external/ community members who do not share Sun's
marketing agenda might have a shot at continuing this potentially
valuable distribution?
The process is:
- Collect SVR4 packages plus s
karun gahlawat wrote:
is there no flash player for opensolaris 2009.06 64 bit? the one on adobe site
is 32 bit and does not work for shipped in firefox.. any pointers, success?
thanks.
Flash player for OpenSolaris 2009.06 is available from
the /extra repository. Follow the directions at:
Andrew Watkins wrote:
I think this is a great shame since OpenSolaris Indiana 2009.06 is not
ready to replace Solaris. I think many users are using SXCE since they
want the new features of OpenSolaris, but Indiana is not ready for that job.
Here is the reasons including my real bugbear!
- A
Xorg seems to use correct driver, but kernel drm module on OpenSolaris do not
support 3D acceleration on ATI/AMD cards above r300, your's card is r7xx based.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-di
Keith Kee wrote:
Hi:
I am running sxce 117 and sxce 119 on my new Dell Studio XPS computer. It seems
to come up fine, but X windows is using the VESA driver with no DRI instead of
the radeon or radeonHD driver. Here is the excerpt of the Xorg.0.log:
(II) RADEON(0): Framebuffer space used by Fi
Hi:
I am running sxce 117 and sxce 119 on my new Dell Studio XPS computer. It seems
to come up fine, but X windows is using the VESA driver with no DRI instead of
the radeon or radeonHD driver. Here is the excerpt of the Xorg.0.log:
(II) RADEON(0): Framebuffer space used by Firmware (kb): 20
(II
On 11 Aug 2009, at 12:27, Jaroslav Joska wrote:
netusite nekdo, zda se da jeste stahnout Solaris 9 Sparc, konretne
potrebuji verzi 10/06.
Na oficialnich strankach nabizi vyrobce pouze SOlaris 10, ktery
nepotrebuji, ptz software,
ktery na dane stanici potrebuji uchodit, je psan pro Solaris 9
>is there no flash player for opensolaris 2009.06 64 bit? the one on adobe site
>is 32 bit and does not work for shipped in firefox.. any pointers, success?
>thanks.
Are you sure that OpenSolaris comes with a 64 bit firefox?
Casper
___
opensolaris-d
is there no flash player for opensolaris 2009.06 64 bit? the one on adobe site
is 32 bit and does not work for shipped in firefox.. any pointers, success?
thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensola
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> Sun is announcing the intent to discontinue production of the Solaris
> Express
> Community Edition (SXCE) by the end of October time-frame. As we intend to
> continue on a bi-weekly build schedule, consolidations will move towards
> producin
Ahoj,
netusite nekdo, zda se da jeste stahnout Solaris 9 Sparc, konretne potrebuji
verzi 10/06.
Na oficialnich strankach nabizi vyrobce pouze SOlaris 10, ktery nepotrebuji,
ptz software,
ktery na dane stanici potrebuji uchodit, je psan pro Solaris 9.
Diky za odpovedi, Jozin
--
This message
On 11/08/2009, at 10:51 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 11/08/2009, at 7:13 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
Live Upgrade is also probably much better for mission critical
servers than "pkg image-update" is in Indiana, because if your
root file system gets corrupted and you have live
>The fact that this exist is the first security issue.
>
>BTW: I did also file a bug but I cannot find it.
>
>Sun is applying this patch to cdrecord:
>
>http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/cmd/cdrtools/cdrecord.c.patch
>
>and this allows _any_ user to write _any_ local file to
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 11/08/2009, at 7:13 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
Live Upgrade is also probably much better for mission critical
servers than "pkg image-update" is in Indiana, because if your root
file system gets corrupted and you have live upgrade set up properly,
then there is a chance th
Uros Nedic wrote:
>
> I hope before you stop releasing SXCE you'll provide all
> tools to build OpenSolaris from source code on OpenSolaris platform.
>
> As far as I know today is very hard to build OpenSolaris distribution
> on OpenSolaris even if we have closed binaries included. We still need
On 11 Aug 2009, at 10:56, Andrew Watkins wrote:
I think this is a great shame since OpenSolaris Indiana 2009.06 is
not ready to replace Solaris. I think many users are using SXCE
since they want the new features of OpenSolaris, but Indiana is not
ready for that job.
That could be exactl
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> is there a summary of the changes in indiana that have to go through arc?
I am in hope that the people who are responsible for these changes have such a
list.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.
Che Kristo wrote:
> I assume by the security issue you are reffering to
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1945 &
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4885
>
> My understanding is that a fix for 4885 is targeted for indiana.next to get
> rid of the XP style "admin by
On 11 Aug 2009, at 03:06, Octave Orgeron wrote:
Does anyone know if S10 will be the last Solaris release? If so,
there has to be more thought around how to migrate customers and
users to OpenSolaris.
Sun's plan has always been to base the next long term support release
of Solaris on a su
I think this is a great shame since OpenSolaris Indiana 2009.06 is not
ready to replace Solaris. I think many users are using SXCE since they
want the new features of OpenSolaris, but Indiana is not ready for that job.
Here is the reasons including my real bugbear!
- Automated Install (ONLY
On 11/08/2009, at 7:27 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
Sun currently has big customers like Joyent.com already using SXCE
in production with massive success. I have only heard of one person
ever using OpenSolaris Indiana 2008.05 in production, and that was
Don McAskill of smugmug.com:
http://blog
On 11/08/2009, at 7:13 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
Please, you can't discontinue SXCE because OpenSolaris Indiana
2009.06 isn't ready yet as a "headless" minimal server OS that I can
install and manage entirely through a DB9 to RJ45 CISCO console
cable (think about the "Netra T1" and all of the
roman stated:
< Hi all.
< I've pefrormed all actions from how-to guide
(http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/AIinstall)), but faced such
problem:
<
< ok boot net:172.16.1.xxx:46503
Thats the wrong syntax, you need to do
boot net:dhcp
Don't know where you got the idea to use '
Sun currently has big customers like Joyent.com already using SXCE in
production with massive success. I have only heard of one person ever using
OpenSolaris Indiana 2008.05 in production, and that was Don McAskill of
smugmug.com:
http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/10/10/success-with-opensolaris
Please, you can't discontinue SXCE because OpenSolaris Indiana 2009.06 isn't
ready yet as a "headless" minimal server OS that I can install and manage
entirely through a DB9 to RJ45 CISCO console cable (think about the "Netra T1"
and all of the other servers Sun makes that don't have graphics ca
67 matches
Mail list logo
