Re: [osol-discuss] Updating to a specific branch revision

2009-09-26 Thread Steven Acres
> > --8<--- >> > > Hey Brandon, >> >> beadm create new_be_118 ; beadm mount new_be_118 /mnt ; \ >> pkg -R /mnt set-authority -P http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev dev < >> http://opensolaris.org/dev> ; \ >> > > It should really be: > > pkg -R /mnt set-publisher -O http://pkg.op

Re: [osol-discuss] Updating to a specific branch revision

2009-09-26 Thread Shawn Walker
Steven Acres wrote: On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brandon High > wrote: What's the correct procedure for updating to a specific branch revision? I've got a system that's at snv_111 which I would like to update to snv_118. I would like to avoid 121-123 due

Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!!

2009-09-26 Thread John Martin
ken mays wrote: 7. OpenGL 3.2 support update (nvidia drivers Only OpenGL 3.1 in b124. I've submitted a LSARC document for OpenGL3.2 / GLSL 1.5 and pending approval the next bundled driver push should have it. (No build schedule yet). ___ opensolaris

Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!!

2009-09-26 Thread ken mays
--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: > From: Ignacio Marambio Catán > Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!! > To: "ken mays" > Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 10:36 PM > why is that? > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20

Re: [osol-discuss] Updating to a specific branch revision

2009-09-26 Thread Steven Acres
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brandon High wrote: > What's the correct procedure for updating to a specific branch > revision? I've got a system that's at snv_111 which I would like to > update to snv_118. I would like to avoid 121-123 due to the raidz > checksum bugs. > > My understanding is

[osol-discuss] Updating to a specific branch revision

2009-09-26 Thread Brandon High
What's the correct procedure for updating to a specific branch revision? I've got a system that's at snv_111 which I would like to update to snv_118. I would like to avoid 121-123 due to the raidz checksum bugs. My understanding is that I need to create a new BE, then update that BE with the new p

Re: [osol-discuss] Not a Sudoer

2009-09-26 Thread Alex Smith (K4RNT)
Use the 'pfexec' command instead. On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:34, Sushant Taneja wrote: > Hello all, > > I installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on my laptop. > And added the default username and password when asked during the > installation. > > Now whenever I login into the account and I want to execut

Re: [osol-discuss] Not a Sudoer

2009-09-26 Thread Thommy M . Malmström
This is not Linux so sudo is not the default alternative for getting higher privileges. OpenSolaris/Solaris use the pfexec command for similar purpose. Have a look at pfexec(1) and exec_attr(4) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolari

[osol-discuss] Not a Sudoer

2009-09-26 Thread Sushant Taneja
Hello all, I installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on my laptop. And added the default username and password when asked during the installation. Now whenever I login into the account and I want to execute the any command or task requiring extra privileges and use sudo in start of the command, I get an