On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> I recently installed a Seagate LP drive in an Atom ICH7 based system. The
> drive is showing up dmesg but not available in format. Is this a known
> problem? Is there a work around for it?
I just found an older thread where this was discussed
I recently installed a Seagate LP drive in an Atom ICH7 based system. The
drive is showing up dmesg but not available in format. Is this a known
problem? Is there a work around for it?
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
>
> > This thread has only academic interest nowadays.
> Hardware is cheap
> > you time is not.
>
> Well experimentation for the sake of testing small
> embedded solutions is
> hardly a waste of my time.
I didn't mean to imply this; I haven't been there yet, no idea where Solaris
would be suita
I tested Milak 0.5 many months ago on a x86 system with 256 MB and it worked
fine. The old SPARC Milax 0.3.2 worked fine as well with 256 MB memory. I think
the chokepoints were when I did 64 MB-128 MB RAM testing which is what Solaris
8 tended to run on.
Using ON snv_142/143 overhead is unde
> This thread has only academic interest nowadays. Hardware is cheap
> you time is not.
Well experimentation for the sake of testing small embedded solutions is
hardly a waste of my time.
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
>
> > As a matter of fact (or coincidence?) I do have a
> laptop with 256mb of ram
> > and tried to boot Milax 0.5 just last weekend. It
> wouldn't boot due to
> > some issue with compression or uncompressing files.
> I think I tried it
> > with the vesa driver also, same error message.
> >
> > It
Also, if this old box has USB port,
could you test USB-boot?
Thanks,
Alex
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Could you please write what's the messages
on console before console-service error,
I'll try to investigate this (I haven't problems
with 0.5 in VBox with 256MB RAM).
Thanks for this,
Alex
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-di
> As a matter of fact (or coincidence?) I do have a laptop with 256mb of ram
> and tried to boot Milax 0.5 just last weekend. It wouldn't boot due to
> some issue with compression or uncompressing files. I think I tried it
> with the vesa driver also, same error message.
>
> It's currently running
As a matter of fact (or coincidence?) I do have a laptop with 256mb of ram and
tried to boot Milax 0.5 just last weekend. It wouldn't boot due to some issue
with compression or uncompressing files. I think I tried it with the vesa
driver also, same error message.
It's currently running Fedora1
Anyone tried the latest Milax ISO on an old machine with 256M of memory? I
just tried that as an experiment and regardless if I choose text console
or regular boot it fails with "can not start console login services" and
then the usual blurb about check "svcs -xv". Of course if I do login in
main
Hi,
On 06/25/10 15:54, Fredrich Maney wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Bart Smaalders
wrote:
As many of us have stated, the next release of Solaris will be based on the
work done in OpenSolaris.
But will it still be recognizable as Solaris? Or is it going to be
just another
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Bart Smaalders
wrote:
> As many of us have stated, the next release of Solaris will be based on the
> work done in OpenSolaris.
But will it still be recognizable as Solaris? Or is it going to be
just another Linux clone, albeit with a different kernel?
fpsm
_
Better yet:
You should know how to find it yourself. Because "genunix" doesn't exactly
roll off the tongue. And you won't remember it next time you need it.
Go to http://www.opensolaris.org
Go to downloads.
Scroll down, and you'll find a section called "Developer Builds"
In that paragraph
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Calum Benson wrote:
>
> On 24 Jun 2010, at 23:16, Edward Martinez wrote:
>
>> whoo whoo, SUN seems to be turning around!
>
> Like it or not, there is no "Sun" any more to turn around.[1]
>
> Cheeri,
> Calum.
>
> [1] Well, except in the last few countries to fully
Well, you don't make money my shoveling millions into a non-revenue
> producing product (aka OpenSolaris).
What I guess what you meant is..committing shareholder money to technical
investments without business strategy?...this is a solitary lesson..many great
technical innovations fail smpl
16 matches
Mail list logo
