On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Wes Williams wrote:
In addition to the above request for build number identified on
Solaris Express download page, I'd really like to be able to
subscribe to a Solaris Express email list that notifies subscribers
when the new Solaris Express build is posted and
On Oct 19, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Shao Wu wrote:
For persnal use, I would suggest to go with AMD -- you can swap
the processor at a later time for a faster cpu or for quart-core
chips without replacing the machine. Just make sure your machine
is using AM2 socket (AMD ma
On Oct 10, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Brad Lewis wrote:
This discussion seems to have run it's course.
I count 13 positive responses to my initial proposal and 0 negative.
Can I get a CAB approval?
If it's not good enough for the CAB people than drop
me a note, I can provide space and bandwidth for
On Sep 13, 2006, at 8:32 PM, Eric Lowe wrote:
I propose a virtual memory project, DMA Memory Infrastructure (DMI for
short).
This project will provide infrastructure to:
- Allocate physical memory in contiguous [1], large page [1], or small
page-size chunks within device address constraints
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is merely to say I think we need to have some type of
standards base, one
that can try to align these different distributions with Solaris in
a way
that will make their OpenSolaris distribution complimentary to
Solaris and
allow the user
On Jun 18, 2006, at 3:46 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
I don't know where I would rightly ask this, so I decided to stick
it into the general discussion.
I have an Opteron system, which is of course 64-bit. But I also
have a qlogic ISP2100 HBA, for which only 32-bit driver is
available on the i8
On May 4, 2006, at 9:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also no safe way to remove the "[XXX]" stuff. I've asked
around
on IRC and the common warning is that this will break "Subject:"-
lines
in non-ASCII encodings.
Please simply leave the tags alone - IMO all the discussion turns
On Apr 20, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Dev Mazumdar wrote:
Hi Jim,
How about the audio newsgroup I had proposed a while back?.
What about expanding the games group to cover audio
and other computer aided leisure related activities too ???
Also I'd request pruning a bunch of newsgroups like some if th
On Apr 19, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
Given the circular nature of this particular proposal, I will at
this
point suggest that we either
- repurpose opensolaris-code
Yeah, go for this one, the name is pretty good.
Kaiser Jasse -- Authorized Stealth Oracle
The axioms
On Apr 11, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Eric Lowe wrote:
Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Eric Lowe wrote:
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely intere
On Mar 27, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Eric Lowe wrote:
The Muskoka project is a collaborative technical bulletin board for
contributors to post and archive any technical content which
otherwise does not have a logical home on OpenSolaris.org.
Currently, this content lives mostly in blog-space or on
On Mar 18, 2006, at 1:01 PM, ken mays wrote:
Solaris 03/06 is based on Nevada_b33.
Ref:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2183/6n4g726uc?a=view
Note:
- You need NV_b34 for JDS GNOME 2.14
- You need NV_b36 for the latest ZFS patches
sxcr-b35 has been available for about 12 hours,
but some
On Mar 17, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Phil Plouffe wrote:
Hi,
I just got a new machine with 2 processors Dual-core(AMD Opteron
270) and I installed the SXCR build 34 on it. When it boots I have
the following error message:
--
WARNING: BIOS microcode patch for AMD Athlon(tm) 64/Opteron(tm)
On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Sean Sprague wrote:
Hello all,
As Dennis suggested, "Band of Brothers" is not a suitable name for
the DVD containing BeleniX, Nexenta and SchilliX; and that a
replacement name should be sought.
Well here's the thread, and a couple of kickoffs that my brain
On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try
that first.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, UNIX admin wrote:
This is what I am referring to, among other things:
"7. License Compatibility.
When you release a work based on the Program, you may include your
own terms covering added parts for which you have, or can
On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
G'Day Folks,
G'Day yourself.
I'd like to suggest creating a Games community, for a couple of
reasons:
1. To list available Games for OpenSolaris, to provide website links
and installation instructions. Imagine games such as rogue,
netha
On Nov 27, 2005, at 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. What are the resource requirements for all this wonderful
Solaris 10 software to work and perform reasonably well?
Is it all available for x86 systems? Does it require a
64-bit dual or quad processor system, 4 GB of RAM and a 200
GB H
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
So, the question is: Is solaris express not able to
access sata drives? How can I go about getting this
to work?
AFAIK, you must configure the SATA controller to emulate
an old (P)ATA controller; then the Solaris ata driver (which
probably kno
On Aug 30, 2005, at 5:28 AM, Rod Evans wrote:
I'd like to propose the creation of a new community that focuses
on Dynamic Linking. Primarily, this would discuss issues regarding
the runtime linker (ld.so.1(1)), and link-editor (ld(1)). However,
having supported these utilities for some time n
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:07 AM, Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Alright, I wonder about this myself as well. I read through all
the threads
discussing this issue at http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?
forumID=13.
I feel compelled to make a few comments and suggestions:
1. Instead of rampa
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 7/21/05, Darren Kenny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Open Solaris is not aimed at just system admins - it's being
targeted at
the desktop user, more so now than ever - so live with it, you are
going
to have to accept that some people simply d
On Jul 21, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 7/20/05, Torrey McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and your sanity as well because it will duplicate many of
packages already part of /usr or /usr/sfw, under /opt/csw.
Which is a bad thing why? (Please don't say space.)
Ok, I'll bi
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 13:45, Jasse Jansson wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:26 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
1. you patch the source code if necessary
Is there a 'recommended' format for patches in the Solaris
environment?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:26 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
1. you patch the source code if necessary
Is there a 'recommended' format for patches in the Solaris environment?
Is this the correct commands to create a patch:
diff -u old_file new_file
and to apply the patch:
patch -i patch_file
On Jul 19, 2005, at 8:45 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
A lot of the traffic is in opensolaris-discuss. Would it make
sense to
try to move some of the traffic to topic-specific lists?
+100
The traffic would decrease somewhat if people could resist
to crosspost to both discuss and the specific lis
Hi Ken...
On Jul 17, 2005, at 5:30 PM, ken mays wrote:
This is to also add the Comunity build (different
links??) on NV-b18 of Solaris Express:
x86 Platform - Solaris Express - Community Release
Solaris Express Build 18, CD 1, English
sol-nv-b18-x86-v1-iso.zip 280.74 MB
Solaris Express Build
On Jul 16, 2005, at 1:36 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 7/15/05, Jasse Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When someone has figured out how to the initial 'make' stage,
then each distro-maker just has to fill in his part.
This requires a central repository for these makefi
On Jul 16, 2005, at 12:47 AM, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Jasse Jansson wrote:
On Jul 15, 2005, at 6:18 PM, James Dickens wrote:
I guess what we need now is to hear from others besides Joerg, and
at this point we aren't ready for technical discussion, we need to
bu
On Jul 15, 2005, at 6:18 PM, James Dickens wrote:
I guess what we need now is to hear from others besides Joerg, and
at this point we aren't ready for technical discussion, we need to
build a community so we don't just have a community of 1 or two, we
need others opinions as well and hope
On Jul 14, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blastwave has all of their own set of libraries, and Sun has
many of
their own in /usr/sfw even, Sunfreeware has their own, pkgsrc
has theirs,
and I imagine that gentoo/portaris has their own also.
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Conor Svensson wrote:
Would any of these laptops turning up be Acer Aspire 5020 series?
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6293571)
I found this line a bit down in the text:
Tested on Acer Aspire 5024wlmi (Note: v. similar spec to Acer F
On Jun 29, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Okay, I know JDS hasn't been released as part of the OpenSolaris
project. However, as a Solaris user, I obviously have the right to
obtain certain parts of it because of the license they're under, such
as Metacity, etc. Where can I get
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:11:45AM -0700, Brian Y Wong wrote:
there was a short discussion last night about bite-size bugs in
the OpenSolaris User Group. I took a look, and many of these bugs
already have proposed fixes. Why not just apply
34 matches
Mail list logo
