We've run XEN here on b134 very successfully, and it came with opensolaris (or
at least, you can just go 'pkg install $module'.
We ran b134 as the dom0, and we tested:
osol_119
osol_134
Sol 10u8
centos_5.3
Windows 7
FreeBSD 7.2
Win2k3_srv
ubuntu 9.10
as domU.
The "production test" environme
If I understand you correctly, it uses same search for both lookups, but
replaces the attributeName? So I can't directly change:
passwd (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uidNumber=%ld)
to a different filter, without also affecting "get passwd by name" ?
I have also noticed that using attributeMap ch
I'm using ldapclient to setup PAM logins from LDAP data. Using mostly standard
posixAccount schema.
The documentation is fairly clear on how to search the forward mappings, ie
using:
-a serviceSearchDescriptor=passwd:ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com?sub
-a attributeMap=passwd:uid=gecos
(In this exa
Bah, the most embarrassing outcome. It is true the snv128 does not boot, but
has been fixed since then. The reason I thought b130 was also not booting,
was...becauseitwasdefaultedtouseserialconsole, and would appear
like it just hanged. Enabling kernel debug and verbose, and still not receiving
I have a home NAS running on a Intel Atom D945GCLF2, with a Supermicro
DAC-SATA-MV8 inserted.
It currently runs OpenSolaris b123 without issues, but I noticed that b124 will
no longer boot. I also tried b130 in the hopes that it has simply been fixed.
But it does not start (not even the kernel'
I have the D945GCLF2 Atom 330 (dualcore), but otherwise features very similar
chipset. Although mine does not have AHCI option for SATA (based on the 27c0
device-id it seems), but features the RGE etc.
I've only just build it, using b114, so I have not yet go to the performance
testing phase,
t
global core dumps: disabled
per-process core dumps: disabled
global setid core dumps: disabled
per-process setid core dumps: disabled
global core dump logging: disabled
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
> Ok, boot -k did work, I could send break on console and do so
cool commands to run.
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>> After that we were pondering Linux in a Solaris Zone, if there is no way
>> for Solaris to handle a MySQL Cluster.
>>
>
> Thought I would do a quick test by running it in a Zone, to see if it
> would crash differently
3% 1:07:32 0.2% global
2 32 1691M 339M17% 0:00:19 0.1% small-zone
--
Jorgen Lundman | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work)
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo| +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell)
Japan| +
t might have been fixed many moons ago.
>
We already tried snv_40, 60b and 77b. They all go down. Currently trying
Solaris 9, but it is not easy to get an old version to go on relatively
new hardware.
After that we were pondering Linux in a Solaris Zone, if there is no way
for Solaris to ha
ng anyone can suggest we try also? Both in terms of
fixing the crashes, but also in terms of monitoring the server in an
attempt to solve why it hangs.
Any reply is appreciated!
Lund
--
Jorgen Lundman | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work
11 matches
Mail list logo
