On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
Make no mistake, I'm personally opposed to Indiana being the 'reference
distribution', mainly because I think it is a divisive label that in the long
run will discourage other people from setting up new distros.
This was brought up at SVOSUG by David
Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/31/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The level of beaurocracy in OpenSolaris exceeds what I've seen
> in any other open source group by an order of magnitude and
> is a facet of life at Sun that we seem to have carried over from
> Solaris to OpenSolaris,
James Carlson wrote:
> There's certainly a lack of clarity for outsiders here. At a minimum,
> this page:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/
>
> should have some link somewhere to our documents (just what is
> "OGB/2007/001" and who or what is actually managing this number
> sp
On Thu, 31 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, that seems to be to cumbersome; I would prefer OGB not to be
> involved in project creations as long as projects are started under
> the wings of a community and the community is not disfunctional
+1
I think we (the OGB) should bemore concerne
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
Well, I didn't write it, but I do disagree with it ;-)
Since there was a period of several weeks during which public comment
was accepted (and incorporated!), I'm curious why you did not raise
your concerns then. There were also two public, open meetings at
which thi
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:28:53PM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Well, I didn't write it, but I do disagree with it ;-)
Since there was a period of several weeks during which public comment
was accepted (and incorporated!), I'm curious why you did not raise
your concerns then. There were also tw
Keith M Wesolowski writes:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> > Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up
> > based on
> > the recording as soon as possible.
>
> No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up based on
the recording as soon as possible.
No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
http://mail.opens
Hi,
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
>> Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up
>> based on
>> the recording as soon as possible.
>
> No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up based
> on
> the recording as soon as possible.
No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/og
Hi,
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I know we approved it...
>>
>>
>> I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or
>> the
>> OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
>
> I think this is about m
11 matches
Mail list logo
