The question wasn't very clear, so here are my apologies.
I was trying to ask if Oracle/Sun will maintain 2 different filesystems
, ZFS and btrfs in two different platforms Open/Solaris and Linux, or if
something can be merged along the way...
I can imagine alot of customers with running linux serv
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> Chad Welsh wrote:
>> So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to
>> protect what has been done so far?
>
> What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost
> no developers working o
I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep
developing only the Openstorage required portions of it, and adding to that the
sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last email
on Friday 9/4), lets hope we will not be forced to move to bsd or
What ever happens to (Open)Solaris the new version of Solaris (Solaris
Next again "Oracle Welcome Session") will surly be based of
OpenSolaris.. I guess the only key word will be "Open"
Andrew
George Koutras wrote:
I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep de
>Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
>Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
>would be dropped?
Which OS supports both?
Linux support brtfs, Solaris supports ZFS.
Casper
___
opensolar
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 16:50, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> George Koutras wrote:
>
>> the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@ora
George Koutras wrote:
>the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last
>email on Friday 9/4),
You need to check your mail filters. The archives show mail to indiana-discuss
from oracle.com addresses since then (April 12 as most recent, since yesterday
seems to have
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:30 PM, George Koutras wrote:
> I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep
> developing only the Openstorage required portions of it, and adding to that
> the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last
> email o