Simon Phipps writes:
> In which case may I suggest you need to be clearer when you are
> speaking on behalf of the OGB or in some other manner of assumed
> authority and when you are just expressing a personal opinion? I'm
> atypical I know, but I had the distinct impression you were seeking
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:42:30PM -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> As an OGB
> > member, I don't
> > have the time to do all that,
> > --
> > Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!"
> > FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any
> > direction!"
> > ___
As an OGB
> member, I don't
> have the time to do all that,
> --
> Keith M Wesolowski"Sir, we're surrounded!"
> FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any
> direction!"
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> openso
On Jun 5, 2007, at 01:37, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
So since the Desktop seemingly isn't relevant enough, I've gone and
My personal feelings about relevance aren't worth a hill of beans. If
the Desktop Group believes exploring t
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> So since the Desktop seemingly isn't relevant enough, I've gone and
My personal feelings about relevance aren't worth a hill of beans. If
the Desktop Group believes exploring this work to be within its
charter, it's free to do so.
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:09:38AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
>> So, can we just do it? I have powers to create a mail alias to start getting
>> some plans discussed [1] - should I just go ahead and do it? Some web space
>> would be nice, but not essential.
>>
>> Ho
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:09:38AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> So, can we just do it? I have powers to create a mail alias to start getting
> some plans discussed [1] - should I just go ahead and do it? Some web space
> would be nice, but not essential.
>
> How do we get this moving forward?
Fi
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:34:07PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
That means that it was voted on at a meeting but must be off in a faq or
minutes somewhere that each community member needs to track down.
A draft of the policy plus a few changes was a
Stephen Lau wrote:
Dave Miner wrote:
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this
Dave Miner wrote:
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or mo
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:34:07PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> That means that it was voted on at a meeting but must be off in a faq or
> minutes somewhere that each community member needs to track down.
A draft of the policy plus a few changes was approved at the 25 April
meeting, and the minut
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the OGB _has_ put the new process in force.
Correction Alan.
That was not me, it was Keith saying that.
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailin
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the OGB _has_ put the new process in force.
That means that it was voted on at a meeting but must be off in a faq or
minutes somewhere that each community member needs to track down.
Has the process passed a vote from the O
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't work.
You can not expect community members to read all minutes from all OGB
meetings (which don't happen regularly) to see if decisions were made that
change policies and processes for OpenSolaris.
We have an -announce al
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Twice this month, for the creation of new projects, I posted
the following:
"Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this
project under the old proc
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't work.
You can not expect community members to read all minutes from all OGB
meetings (which don't happen regularly) to see if decisions were made
that change policies and processes for OpenSolaris.
We have an -announce alias. We have process
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Twice this month, for the creation of new projects, I posted
> the following:
>
> "Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this
> project under the old process. The 2-business-day discussion perio
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
for sponsorship consi
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
fo
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> >On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> >
> >The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
> >for sponsorship consideration...
>
> I
21 matches
Mail list logo
