On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> One hopes that his actions are logical, but they're not all programmatic.
Many are, though. At present, since we're teamware based, the following
happens:
- gateling does a putback
- putback sends a message to a handful
Keith M Wesolowski writes:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:13:01AM -0800, UNIX admin wrote:
>
> > The reason I took up interest in the code gates is that some of the
> > kernel engineering folks' posts seem to imply there's 'gatekeeper'
> > logic of some sort sitting on a code gate, doing basic sani
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:13:01AM -0800, UNIX admin wrote:
> The reason I took up interest in the code gates is that some of the
> kernel engineering folks' posts seem to imply there's 'gatekeeper'
> logic of some sort sitting on a code gate, doing basic sanity checks
> on the putback source code
> I would also hesitate to call it sophisticated. If
> you are just talking
> about ON (i.e., all the stuff in OpenSolaris), then
> it's really pretty
> simple. If you are talking about all of Solaris
> (including Gnome, CDE, the
> install tools, etc), then it is complicated but not
> particularl
Coy Hile wrote:
Speaking from experience, there James? :)
Shush, you! I'm sure Mike Sullivan remembers :|
*cough* freeing a kernel buffer with the wrong size
isn't a good thing to do.
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris Datapath Engineering
Data Management Group
Sun Microsystems
__
> The build infrastructure is fairly straighforward.
> What's not straightforward,
> is the development process. OpenSolaris process is
> based on the Solaris process,
> you can read about it here:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/os_dev_process/
Just a minor clarification - alt
Speaking from experience, there James? :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
