[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Project Proposal: libc_i18n.a rewrite.

2007-02-08 Thread Dmitry Nadezhin
One more tunable disassembler can be found on: https://maxwellassembler.dev.java.net/ It has definition of SparcV9 instruction set. It was used to generate ssembler/disassembler in Java. However, generation of disassembler in C still have to be implemented. This message posted from opensolaris

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Project Proposal: libc_i18n.a rewrite.

2007-02-05 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Ok, so how about an unrestricted SPARCv8 disassembler (for NetBSD) as a starting point? http://www.users.qwest.net/~eballen1/source.html wide open, not GPL. There's also something at http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/toolkit/ but I see no mention of a license, and it looks very unconventional in

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Project Proposal: libc_i18n.a rewrite.

2007-02-04 Thread Dennis Clarke
>> If you want a project that has as it's goal to be >> able to build the >> opensolaris sources without encumbered binaries, AND >> you want this to be >> able to be done on both SPARC and x86, then both of >> these need to be >> addressed. > > Completely agreed! > >> I knwo that SPARC is not gen

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Project Proposal: libc_i18n.a rewrite.

2007-02-03 Thread Shawn Walker
> If you want a project that has as it's goal to be > able to build the > opensolaris sources without encumbered binaries, AND > you want this to be > able to be done on both SPARC and x86, then both of > these need to be > addressed. Completely agreed! > I knwo that SPARC is not generally po