UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is interesting. What do you believe Sun could make in Solaris Express
> (assuming it's all licensed under CDDL, bla bla bla...) that SchilliX
> couldn't follow?
Solaris Express contains a lot of CS software.
> As it stands right now, isn't SchilliX
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:58:55AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> This is interesting. What do you believe Sun could make in Solaris
> Express (assuming it's all licensed under CDDL, bla bla bla...) that
> SchilliX couldn't follow?
Not everything in Solaris Express is licensed under the CDDL. For
st
> OpenSolaris is not a complete enough OS. You cannot
> boot it, you cannot compile
> software on it and you cannot run applications on it.
In other words, it is not yet self hosting. But it will be sooner or later.
> Any way Sun goes with Solaris Express that cannot be
> pusued by e.g. SchilliX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In the document:
> >http://www.kornshell.com/info/
> >it says it's compatable. Just curious what the big compatiblity
> >problems are? Sun technically ships ksh93 in the form of 'dtksh'.
> >I can imagine if you have to open ksh88 up it's going to be
> >a bumpy road
>> They're shipping ksh93, which is open source.
>> Solaris includes ksh88
>> (g I believe), which is not. We'd love to just
>> upgrade, but they're
>> not 100% compatible.
>>
>
> In the document:
>http://www.kornshell.com/info/
>it says it's compatable. Just curious what the big compatiblity
> They're shipping ksh93, which is open source.
> Solaris includes ksh88
> (g I believe), which is not. We'd love to just
> upgrade, but they're
> not 100% compatible.
>
In the document:
http://www.kornshell.com/info/
it says it's compatable. Just curious what the big compatiblity
problems a
> Does it matter?
Absolutely, what did you think? Depeding on which grounds the ata driver has
been "held", it's relatively easy to get a feel how long it'll be before it's
released. (Trust me, I've been involved in these things before.)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
UNIX admin wrote:
well, we're certainly happy to work those
simultaneously, just so you know.
What do you mean?
ah, God.
"Feel free to file RFEs for ata, while we work on the process of getting you the
source for ata so you can make the change on your own."
_
> So it is an enhancement and thus still worth of a
> change request (CR)
> being logged in http://bugs.opensolaris.org.
"A picture speaks a thousand words", so says an old saying. I just captured
this steamin' fresh from the RSM not but two minutes ago:
Can't open boot device
ok probe-ide
De
> Get 2 Euro and buy a USB-2 CompactFlash <-> USB
> adaptor.
But Joerg, I already have an ATA <---> CF adapter. I want to use a CF card as a
hard disk inside the machine, permanently attached.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-dis
> well, we're certainly happy to work those
> simultaneously, just so you know.
What do you mean?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
