BTW: I am aware that the OGB minutes say otherwise than that separate
OS support will be made available:
https://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=125252&tstart=30
I don't get why this isn't reflected in the "Oracle Hardware and
Systems Support Policy" doc released 16 March 2010 (htt
Am 10 Apr 2010 um 15:48 schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
You should
also discover some obstacle to purchasing it, even if you want to.
Because
they want you to buy it on Sun hardware, or from a huge name
reseller, such
as Dell or HP or IBM. Solaris 10 is also known as SunOS 5.10.
Opensolaris
On 04/11/10 09:53 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Graham McArdle wrote:
It's kind of ironic timing that a newcomer to OpenSolaris& Solaris would
discover and be surprised that Solaris 10 is free, when we've just had a long
thread discussing how annoying it is that Solaris 10 is no longer fre
Graham McArdle wrote:
> It's kind of ironic timing that a newcomer to OpenSolaris & Solaris would
> discover and be surprised that Solaris 10 is free, when we've just had a long
> thread discussing how annoying it is that Solaris 10 is no longer free!
Solaris 10 was never free.
It is a commer
> I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free
> version of Solaris. The one where the community helps
> develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris was
> the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
> Just went to the website and it says I can have
> Solaris 10 free?
It's kind of
So if I'm not a developer or programmer and don't want to be, Maybe I and
others like me should get Solaris 10 a finished product.behind the completed??
True Solaris pre-installed inside one of their production machines might be a
better way to go. You could still try it in another machine jus
You (Edward Ned Harvey) wrote:
> > And you're talking about the OpenSolaris.COM binary distribution
> > identifing
> > itself as SunOS 5.11... Don't know, if that applies to Nexenta,
> > Schillix,
> > Belenix et.al...
>
> I dont know about Nexenta etc, either. But the emphasis on "COM" isn't
> r
> From: Matthias Pfützner [mailto:matth...@pfuetzner.de]
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 10:59 AM
>
> Some small corrections, if I'm not mistaken:
>
> It's not 30, but 90 days...
I think you're right. My mistake.
> And you're talking about the OpenSolaris.COM binary distribution
> identifing
You (Edward Ned Harvey) wrote:
> > From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> > discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of jay krik
> >
> > I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of
> > Solaris. The one where the community helps develop future
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of jay krik
>
> I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of
> Solaris. The one where the community helps develop future releases of
> Solaris, and Solaris was t
You (jay krik) wrote:
> I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of Solaris. The
> one where the community helps develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris
> was the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
> Just went to the website and it says I can have Solaris 10
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of Solaris. The
one where the community helps develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris
was the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
Just went to the website and it says I can have Solaris 10 free?
So if I'm not a develop
12 matches
Mail list logo
