if your file landed in opensolaris, then you signed an SCA which means
you gave sun and now oracle rights akin ownership.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote:
>>
>> > On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote:
>
> > On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >> I don't expect to ever see binaries for the
> OpenSolaris distribution again. The most I think we
> can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines
> of the old "Solaris Expres
On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote:
> On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
>>
>>>
>> I don't expect to ever see binaries for the OpenSolaris distribution again.
>> The most I think we can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines of
>> the old "Solaris Express" programme. I
On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
I don't expect to ever see binaries for the OpenSolaris distribution again. The most I
think we can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines of the old "Solaris
Express" programme. I hope I will be proved wrong though.
I agree, and also I ex
>
> I don't expect to ever see binaries for the
> OpenSolaris distribution again. The most I think we
> can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines
> of the old "Solaris Express" programme. I hope I will
> be proved wrong though.
>
> Andrew.
That, begs the question how feasible a not-p
> On 08/12/10 03:58 PM, andrew wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Alan Coopersmith
> >> wrote:
> > Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >> #3 It does not make sense to discontinue
> >>> development of opensolaris.
> > Some
> >> day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you
> >>> know.
Paul Griffith wrote:
> I expect Oracle to give us more info during OpenWorld. I am expecting
> more to come regarding OpenSolaris, I don't think they will call it
> OpenSolaris. No! I don't have any inside knowledge, just thinking out loud.
Given the fact that Oracte still did not contact the
>
>
> I expect Oracle to give us more info during
> OpenWorld. I am expecting
> more to come regarding OpenSolaris, I don't think
> they will call it
> OpenSolaris. No! I don't have any inside knowledge,
> just thinking out loud.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
> _
On 08/13/10 08:04 AM, Paul Griffith wrote:
I expect Oracle to give us more info during OpenWorld. I am expecting
more to come regarding OpenSolaris, I don't think they will call it
OpenSolaris. No! I don't have any inside knowledge, just thinking out
loud.
Based on current form, "Oracle Opa
On 08/12/10 03:58 PM, andrew wrote:
--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
#3 It does not make sense to discontinue
development of opensolaris.
Some
day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you
know. But they're
diverting
development away from opensolari
>
>
> --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
> > >> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > >>> #3 It does not make sense to discontinue
> > development of opensolaris.
> > >> Some
> > >>> day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you
> > know. But they're
> > >> diverting
> > >>> development away f
--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> >> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >>> #3 It does not make sense to discontinue
> development of opensolaris.
> >> Some
> >>> day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you
> know. But they're
> >> diverting
> >>> development away from opensolaris right no
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Alan Coopersmith [mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:11 AM
>>
>> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>>> #3 It does not make sense to discontinue development of opensolaris.
>> Some
>>> day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you know.
Am 11.08.2010 14:53, schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kölle
Yes. There simply is no market for desktop unix (not counting OSX).
This may be OT, but I don't quite agree.
You are
On 11 Aug 2010, at 14:21, Florian Manschwetus wrote:
>>
> You mean comparable with snow leopard, according to my last experiences
> in vbox. (most full blown compiz I've ever seen, no chance for ubuntu to
> come close here)
There's no real difference in compiz between OpenSolaris and Ubuntu; II
Am 11.08.2010 15:04, schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
>> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
>> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Gress
>>
>> Well I bought into Sun on their Workstation line. I don't need
>> Servers. My MCAD program runs on Solaris an
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of ken mays
>
> Ed,
> the term 'UNIX desktop market is dead' is kind of a
> misnomer. Is it not?
Who said that? I know I didn't.
___
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Gress
>
> Well I bought into Sun on their Workstation line. I don't need
> Servers. My MCAD program runs on Solaris and Windows only. I should
> switch to Windows?
Iden
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kölle
>
> Yes. There simply is no market for desktop unix (not counting OSX).
This may be OT, but I don't quite agree. The three desktop OSes that I
recommend and support
> From: Alan Coopersmith [mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:11 AM
>
> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > #3 It does not make sense to discontinue development of opensolaris.
> Some
> > day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you know. But they're
> diverting
> >
--- On Tue, 8/10/10, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> #2 Oracle sells servers, not laptops. They'll
> include a GUI, but it has
> always been, and will continue to be, a pretty basic
> gnome. Nothing flashy
> like aero or compiz or aqua. They are designing it to
> be servers. If you
> want a flash
You (Edward Ned Harvey) wrote:
> #2 Oracle sells servers, not laptops. They'll include a GUI, but it has
> always been, and will continue to be, a pretty basic gnome. Nothing flashy
> like aero or compiz or aqua. They are designing it to be servers. If you
> want a flashy laptop, use OSX, Wind
Am 11.08.2010 06:24, schrieb Paul Gress:
On 08/10/10 11:45 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Isn't this all what I've said right along? It's the only thing that makes
sense:
#1 Solaris is extremely out of date w.r.t. opensolaris. Oracle needs to
release a commercially viable updated solaris while
Update- i want to add that it seems Mr. Fowler has confimerd that Oracle
stopped developing new servers around AMD CPUs and will use Intel CPUs only,
looks like a move from Jobs playbook;)
excerpt:
"In the interview, Fowler confirmed earlier reports that Oracle has stopped
developing servers b
On 08/10/10 11:45 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Isn't this all what I've said right along? It's the only thing that makes
sense:
#1 Solaris is extremely out of date w.r.t. opensolaris. Oracle needs to
release a commercially viable updated solaris while they still have an edge
over BTRFS and
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> #3 It does not make sense to discontinue development of opensolaris. Some
> day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you know. But they're diverting
> development away from opensolaris right now, to make *damn* sure they
> release solaris 11 this year.
My calender stil
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
>
> >it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well
> remove most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not
> required and make
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
>
> >it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well
> remove most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not
> required and make
On 08/10/10 16:22, Paul Gress wrote:
Also, if I read in between the lines for this statement "Solaris 11
will be a superset of what is in Opensolaris", it say's to me, Oracle
is not open with Opensolaris any more. There will likely be
proprietary extensions added not in Opensolaris. Basically I
On 08/11/10 08:22 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
Forgive me if I don't get excited. But thats for Solaris 11, for all
we know, based on Larrys expectations, it will probably be tuned for
Database and Servers. Oracle may well remove most desktop and laptop
functionality, after all, it's not required an
On 10 Aug 2010, at 21:22, Paul Gress wrote:
>
> Also, if I read in between the lines for this statement "Solaris 11 will be a
> superset of what is in Opensolaris", it say's to me, Oracle is not open with
> Opensolaris any more. There will likely be proprietary extensions added not
> in Opens
>it will probably be tuned for Database and Servers. Oracle may well remove
>most desktop and laptop functionality, after all, it's not required and makes
>support much harder.
>Fowler added that Oracle will continue to invest in its open source
>communities. That said he noted that Oracle rea
news as requested;)
Oracle Details Upcoming Solaris 11 Release
excerpt:
quotes from presentation:
We have a large new version of Solaris coming out in 2011 called Solaris 11,"
John Fowler, Oracle's executive vice president of systems, told InternetNews.com
Fowler said that quite a bit of th
thanks.
stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I just returned from a short trip. So what was the
> conclusion and what are the news
> about "Oracle Systems Strategy Update" ? Something
> new ? How about
> Solaris/OpenSolaris ?
>
> thanks,
> Stefan
news as requested;)
Oracle Details Upcoming Solaris 11 Release
excerpt:
quotes from present
I just returned from a short trip. So what was the conclusion and what are the
news
about "Oracle Systems Strategy Update" ? Something new ? How about
Solaris/OpenSolaris ?
thanks,
Stefan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-disc
> I think this may be important to solaris
> customers:)
>
>
> excerpt:
> Tuesday, August 10, 2010
> 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. PT Live Webcast
>
> Join John Fowler, Executive Vice President, Systems,
> for a live update on the strategy and roadmap for
> Oracle’s Sun servers, storage an
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Paul Gress wrote:
> On 08/ 5/10 11:31 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>
> I think this may be important to solaris customers:)
>
>
> excerpt:
> Tuesday, August 10, 2010
> 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. PT Live Webcast
>
> Join John Fowler, Executive Vice President,
>
my is more of an "announcement" then news to an event being held by oracle,
yours i think qualifies for being "news", i stopped posting news .)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@open
On 08/ 5/10 11:31 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I think this may be important to solaris customers:)
excerpt:
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
9:00 a.m. âEUR" 10:00 a.m. PT Live Webcast
Join John Fowler, Executive Vice President, Systems, for a live update on the
strategy and roadmap for O
I think this may be important to solaris customers:)
excerpt:
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. PT Live Webcast
Join John Fowler, Executive Vice President, Systems, for a live update on the
strategy and roadmap for Oracle’s Sun servers, storage and complete systems
41 matches
Mail list logo
