red a few times already, non-debug bins will be
provided in the near future, right now the build infrastructure needed
to support it isn't there (what I last heard) and the person who can
do that has a very long todo list at the moment I believe.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMA
t exist, someone could probably write a PAM module to do
it, since 'su' under Solaris uses PAM for authentication.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
vsk'. that's freaking
> scary. what did I do wrong?
what's the output of the auths command when logged in as devsk
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
open
being assigned to it
to assume the role.
Output of /usr/bin/profiles -l might be helpful too?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it without assigning that role to the
user you're sui'ng as, does it still let you assume the role?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/9/05, Scott Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:37:57PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> > I would say you've found a bug then. Since the roles manpage claims
>
> Or far more likely he's done something wrong in configuring the role.
months ago, but Oracle still hasn't released
it for Solaris x86 (as of a few days ago when I checked). As long as
application providers continue to treat Solaris x86 like an
illegitimate child the Solaris experience will be subpar as well for
applications.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and S
I had passed -d to bldenv.
Additionally:
* I had to manually remove the ' -O' from i386_COPTFLAG in
Makefile.master so that I could build sh without optimizations to aid
debugging with dbx
* Source code files were read-only by default
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMA
> to bring the role as close to user root as possible and without it the
> behaviour is same. so, where did I mess up?
I don't think user_attr changes will show up until that user has
logged out and logged back in.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTEC
ghts. Once I logged out and
back in it was fine.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ch unless it makes sense to do so.
>
> So wait for a package update that will be along just as soon as possible.
+1 to the "Dennisnator" as always :}
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
_
ilt with the SunStudio 10 compilers."
No worries, I almost missed it too :}
>From the sound of it, he had tons of patches as well. Ugh.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
See this post:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/26749
-Shawn
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
bution of your own. So, go
forth, and create your bountiful distribution full of all the choices
you wish to make.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
sibly var and tmp
partitions. I hate not having ready access to things I need when only
'/' gets mounted during emergencies.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discu
nts are invalid.
For those of us in countries where we cannot change the fact that they
are not legal, a "legitimate" option would be greatly appreciated.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
orted here in a
> separate thread but didn't get much response from people, so assuming that
> everyone is a getting a jittery USB mouse and skipping in xmms during IO
> loads) and I just wanted to see if the non-debug version performs any better.
See this post:
http://groups.yahoo
please explain?
I think adding something like:
interrupt-priorities=9;
I believe ?
I would respond to the linked message asking about it...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
e while still allowing a great amount of
freedom for individual distribution creators.
I look forward with great anticipation to what lies ahead, because I
think that I can only get better from here if foresight and planning
are used as our primary tools going forward.
--
Shawn Walker, S
r own communities),
but also automatically available in an aggregated and categorized form
at the top level. That way when one is reading about a particular
community or project they can see all that is relevant to just that
project, and when browsing at the top level they have access to a
wealth of i
ers could provide mirrors. But, it
would be better to me if it the "official" or "central" site was
opensolaris.org, if only because it would help make it really seem
like it was really *part* of the main OpenSolaris community effort.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Sys
nsolation, I see the same thing on my system. Though it
occurs far less often (hardly at all) if I use dtterm instead of
gnome-terminal. I'm using the OSS drivers currently as well. I'll
leave the gallery to make of that what they will :] I'm still not
giving up my tabbed terminal th
er than some libraries that
there are no binary distribution rights for (libm possibly?) it should
be the same. What *specific* differences are there that you believe
would effect this testing. I think if you identified what the
*specific* issues were that would help everyone considerably.
--
Shawn Walk
nd somewhat, but only because of assumptions. The
thing is, you already know all of the problems, so wouldn't it be
better for the community if you posted what they where so they could
be addressed? There is no guarantee that I or others will find all of
the same issues that you have found. You
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think I understand somewhat, but only because of assumptions. The
> > thing is, you already know all of the problems, so wouldn't it be
> > better for the c
n
discussed on this list before, many of the components of JDS are also
used by Stefan's KDE builds. Plans with plans, and I haven't yet
sorted all of it out. In the meantime, I'm just contributing in
whatever way I can...
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ar, and faster than Solaris
tar.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/STARvsGNUTAR
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
y make sense
> to have jds/gnome-discuss and kde-discuss. Perhaps we share our Blog
> space, and subdivide the web site as appropriate -
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/gnome
> http
uld be nice to show others that at least in "OpenSolaris land", the
jihad will remain silent and "synergy" (oh my , I
just used a marketing term :)) is expected. Because in the end, the
members of the community are what matters not which desktop they're
h too :}
Though I admit, it's probably easier with what you describe...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
orm than
> windows.
> Of course it's far away from being perfect, but it's built on the most
> promising base, named QT.
While I respect that is your opinion, please don't start KDE vs. GNOME
flamewars using inflammatory language.
--
Shawn Walker, So
cessary
to build at the bare minimum or real fixes and enhancements. If the
portability or correctness issue actually becomes a problem, then at
that point it's time to fork. I often run into the same problem with
Software that I package to run on production servers for the
uot;,
only for OpenSolaris...
I'm certain that SUN probably has ABI tests already internally, so
that could go a long ways towards helping achieve the goal.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Talk about things positively, such as: "I think the build
process for GNOME could be improved as currently I have issues
building it."
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
12th, 2005
I think the crypto source is included now in the July 1st tarball, but
isn't integrated? Unable to check at the moment...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
her than an industry
> standard in this context.
It is a *UNIX* industry standard regardless of whether it is a *Linux*
industry standard, since Linux is certainly not UNIX.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ested in any of them, it was more of a
curiosity question... You've more than answered adequately.
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
using the same patches, usually differences come down to installation
locations and configure options...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ss CDs?
You need all of them.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
given binary redistribution
rights for the pkg tools? That would help considerably with the
process...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
you are suggesting that
freedesktop.org related efforts themselves need organisation, it would
seem much of these efforts are already underway inside SUN itself.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
no
> simpler (or whatever the heck it was that Einstein supposedly said :-))
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein
http://physics.augustana.edu/einstein.html
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusa
rg/pipermail/summaries/2005-May/006490.html
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
g binary redistribution rights will be
sufficient. However, eventual source release is a must for long-term
viability. Either that or the necessary information (API
specifications) must be available so that an alternative can be
implemented.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PR
users to feel
more at home, and some others. So, don't be quick to dismiss what's
there :)
The patches that are included are true value adds...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
ool
> > to determine whether that is the case.
> >
> > For example, on Solaris:
> >
> > 1. insert media into the drive
> > 2. /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
>
> You do't need to stop volmgt.
>
> Jörg
I have to on my Solaris 10 GA system Jör
On 7/18/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/18/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I
On 7/18/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this to tools-discuss instead of the big list; it's
> > likely to be of
>
> no tools-discuss here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa ...:(
Look here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/discussions/
--
Shawn
:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/darren/20050318
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
he FAQ :)
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/website_faq/#cross-posting
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
985
That collection of documents will explain:
* System Management
* User / Group Management
* Client-Server Support Management
* Shutdown / Startup / Reboot
* Services Management
* Software Management
* Patch Management
It should give you a good overall view of the system and the basic
realistic. Take no offense in that statement, just
realise that you are going to have to spend some time spelunking
through the docs.
If you have some ideas on how SUN could better present the
documentation, then feel free to send feedback to your SUN sales
rep
On 7/20/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How may I set "verbosemode" to a value != 0 and when will
> we have full sources for multiboot?
I'm pretty sure verbosemode is activated by doing -v to the kernel...
Just like one does -kdv...
--
Shawn W
lated directory tree to install into, and actually conflict with
each other location wise.
Ideally, a user should be able to click a link, or download a package
from disparate sources, and installation should just work. That's what
happens on other systems like Windows or Mac OS X today for the
certainly
easier than creating Debian packages (in my personal view).
Regardless of "favorite package system", I still think there's a way
to at least mitigate or reduce some of the problems caused by these
duplicate software stacks. It just requires some agreement and
compromise am
ganizational boundaries...
Is that still considered the "proper practice"? Would I be considered
"evil" if I released packages without the prefixes?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
it's just not
that simple.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t's own project since there are
many things under an "OpenSolaris" distribution that people would want
to package that don't fit in with Debian's strict guidelines.
While using the work they've already done or starting a new project
based off thei
igured there without ever bringing up a terminal. In
addition, webmin is included with Solaris 10 by default and that's
another option...
So I would disagree that it "constantly require you to bring up a
terminal to make even the slightest change to the systems
configuration."
--
Shawn
hatever folks want to do with it.
We're all part of a bigger community, try to understand that and stop
making East / West Berlin style speeches. Many of us maintain and
develop software for multiple operating systems, of which Solaris is
just one (even if it is perhaps our favourite one sometimes).
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
m where the only Solaris
> part is the kernel. That's BUSTED.
>
No, it's simply a set of ideas you don't agree with. It may not fit
with the Solaris philosophy, but it doesn't make it any less valid as
an idea, experiment, or project.
--
Shawn Walker, Software an
enefits associated with the proposal. In this case, the
> ability to use 3 or 4 additional characters in a package name seems
> like a very small benefit against the above-described risks,
> especially since you can already use about 28 characters anyway.
So is it ok for me to na
N engineer post...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that has to defend themselves can that might
be biased against the license holder. Either way, someone's going to
be unhappy. I can't imagine that clause being put in there without
good reason.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAI
going
forward. Debian's Free Software Guidelines can be very strict at times
justifiably or not is a matter of opinion. Even if the CDDL wasn't an
obstacle, I don't believe they would accept the binary redistribution
guidelines that parts of ON will likely always be under.
--
Shawn W
On 7/22/05, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:39:09PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> > justifiably or not is a matter of opinion. Even if the CDDL wasn't an
> > obstacle, I don't believe they would accept the binary redist
On 7/23/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "grep /var/sadm/install/contents |awk '{print $1}'" to see which
> files were installed by a package? when is this simple request going to be
> merged in 'pkginfo -l'?
Workaround example:
pkgchk -v SUN
On 7/25/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:39:09PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >
> > > justifiably or not is a matter of opinion. Even if the CDDL wasn't an
> >
no problem with working
whatever way is required. It doesn't matter to me if Solaris leads
OpenSolaris or the other way around. Your ideas are noble, but please
don't assume that everyone has to work the way you say they do.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and
hat initial SX builds
> worked too.
Let's move this to opensolaris-help, please remove opensolaris-discuss
from the to or cc lines in any further replies.
To answer your question, we need more info, see this blog entry:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/comments/dmick/Weblog/diagnosing_kernel
On 13/11/2007, Mirko Pluhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the first developer preview
> are there any plans to integrate a JDK into the package repository ?
> I'm tired of download it from Sun and install it manually ;-)
Yes, it is being worked on.
--
Shawn
parts also be available under the CDDL to ensure that
OpenSolaris-related components continue to follow our community's
choice of licensing?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses
On 15/11/2007, Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:40, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> > http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2203486/sun-tiptoes-gplv3
> >
> > According to VNUNet, Sun plans on a piece of server virtualisation
> > softwar
On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker writes:
> > On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Shawn Walker writes:
> > > > A wide-range of licensing has been embraced, to be sure. However, that
> >
On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker writes:
> > A wide-range of licensing has been embraced, to be sure. However, that
> > has only applied so far to 3rd party or non-OS pieces so far.
>
> How would a separate management application b
On 15/11/2007, Reggie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the answers. Does this work? Type init6 in run?
I think you need to open a terminal window, type "pfexec bash" and
then "init 6".
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.
On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker writes:
> > For example, if I wanted to take the source code of the hypervisor
> > manager and add bits and pieces of OpenSolaris code to it; I could
> > not. Even though it comes from Sun and is OS
Solaris-related things all
the time because it is what I love doing.
However, you have to find balance between your personal life and that
which you love to do.
Very few people get paid to do what they love.
I have often had to choose work that pays well instead of work I would
love to do.
Findin
ct/missing
>
> Looks like someone has tried to fix something that wasn't broken... :-(
Why do you assume this?
The behaviour looks like it could be correct to me. Can you prove that
less is not supposed to do this?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.b
me.
Indeed; it has worked this way in *BSDs, and all GNU/Linux distros I
have used for a long time.
It is nice to see holy wars ended :)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of a
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> > > > > Seems as if
On 18/11/2007, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 18/11/2007, Thommy M. Malmström
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
ur is a matter of preference.
See this bug for info on why this change is correct:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=1b34c086175d03f063a3daad5d82?bug_id=6622763
If you are using xterm, you can use "titleInhibit" to prevent this behaviou
s just triggered by the change in
> terminfo. Jufging too wuick is always wrong.
However, in this case, Solaris' terminal definition was missing
definitions completely and that was a bug.
They have now been added.
While it is a personal decision, this finally meets the behaviour that
many
ot titleIhibit (it's derived from ti-te Inhibit; were
> ti and te are the termcap settings for smcup and rmcup.
Ooops; sorry about that :)
Thanks for the correction Casper,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough paral
On 18/11/2007, "Thommy M. Malmström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The init and term strings have been traditionally in "is" and "rs".
dio was removed due to a licensing conflict in b75.
See this bug for more information:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413705
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junctio
>and Solaris.
> >
> > Why on earth would you assume that and not just read the fix which just
> > rmcup and smcup?
>
> You said that xterm was affected
Of course xterm is going to be indirectly affecteded when terminfo
entries for xterm are
ere they are
supposed to be when using less as a pager with man, those have been
working for some time.
You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
because I don't see one in b76 or b74.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
t does not make it true;
> > xterm *was* affected by this bug fix.
> >
>
> Not on my SXCE b76...
Mine is. So yours must be using a non-standard configuration.
less behaves identically in both gnome-terminal and xterm here for me under b76.
As I expect, it restores the
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You need to be more specific about what problem you are talking about,
> > because I don't see one in b76 or b74.
>
> If you do not know
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On 18/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Just try out if you do not understand the problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) MUCH more than intended is underlined
> &
ugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6622763
"11-Closed:Not a Defect (Closed)"
I can also verify that it now works as it has worked on many other
systems for a long time (i.e. GNU/Linux, *BSDs, etc.)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
&quo
pensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> Hopefully this has been pulled for expediency by Sun Legal and once everyone
> is clear that it is GPL2 only it will be put back. It would be great to see
> the details of how this became re-licensed - do you have any more info on
> this Jör
it can easily revert to
the old behaviour. The small inconvenience to those individuals is far
outweighed in the positive overall user experience increase for
others.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough parallel uni
or a potential workaround would be
> appreciated
Can't really help you without seeing what panic you have.
Follow the directions in this blog post to provide us the needed information:
http://blogs.sun.com/dmick/date/20050615
Thanks!
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
h
laptop. All the good things for laptops came in after Solaris
> 10, right?
Actually, most of the good things for laptops are now in Solaris
Express. WiFi support out of the box for Intel chipsets, better video
support, etc.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader
ng should it take to get there?
The bugs are triaged by a human, so during the holidays it may take
several days.
Normally it's the same or next day in my personal experience.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enoug
601 - 700 of 1553 matches
Mail list logo
