Hello Marco,
MKC> The idea is to use the Verified Identity (IV) CA to get credibility to
MKC> the name. This will become clear when we put the VI CA online in a few
MKC> days -- then you'll see what it is capable of. I'll let you know when
MKC> it's online. Meanwhile, its main ideas are described
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:01:51 -0600,
Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
phil-openssl-users> Is 0.9.7 going to continue the version numbering
phil-openssl-users> mess that 0.9.6 has?
As far as I know, we haven't decided on a different scheme.
phil-openssl-users>
I am new to creating ssl certificates so I am not sure if I am
doing this correctly, so here it goes...
I am using windows 2000 with IIS.
First I created a request through IIS. I
renamed the request to certreq.pem and placed the request in the demoCA
directory
Next I created my own priv
> I know it should be private keys somehow involved into authentication.
> I'm sure I just missed something.
> Could anybody help me, please ?
Aleksandr,
The private key is called private because it only resides on your computer.
It is never involved in the exchange of information - hence the n
Hi evilbunny,
> I've a similar project under development, little more testing to see
> if the user has the rights to the domain, and they generate their own
> private keys etc... little more effort on the users part, however I've
> tried to code it in a sane method, by stopping people being able t
Is 0.9.7 going to continue the version numbering mess that 0.9.6 has?
Or can someone please explain how to install 2 or more different versions
of openssl that differ by the letter only (such as 0.9.6e and 0.9.6g) so
that both versions are present on the system and that programs which were
linked
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:43:21 -0800, Sunitha
Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
sunithak> Does open ssl support AES scheme? Essentially, the schemes
sunithak> given in, RFC 3268, i.e AES ciphersuites for TLS.
Yes, currently in OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta3.
--
Richard Levitte
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 28 Oct 2002
15:18:37 -0800 (PST), Fiel Cabral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
unix4aliving> Can the first parameter to MD5_Final be NULL?
unix4aliving>
unix4aliving> MD5_Final(NULL, c);
Well, it can, but the result will be a big KABOOM, also called
"SIGSEGV" or
true in all accounts.
i know the solution is simply use netscape.
wally
- Original Message -
From:
Jose Correia
(J)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002
00:51
Subject: RE: Converting PEM file to
PKCS12 or PFX for the MacOS (Not Mac OSx)...
H
Title: Re: Converting PEM file to PKCS12 or PFX for the MacOS (Not Mac OSx)...
is netscape 7 all that good? i hated 6.x for it was just way
too slow for my taste buds. their java implementation is very
poor.
your thoughts?
wally
- Original Message -
From:
Karl-Michael
Werz
Title: Re: Converting PEM file to PKCS12 or PFX for the MacOS (Not Mac OSx)...
thanks karl-micheal for the valuable info. after tedious
research into the matter your findings is absolutely correct! i indeed had to
use netscape, but i didn't download 7, instead i stuck with 4.80 because their
Signing uses the private key, normally with a longer exponent.
Verification uses the public key, normally with a short exponent
and with mostly zeros in the exponent. Good cryptographic
software should not have different execution times dependent
on a bit value, though.
Martin
icewind <[EMAIL PR
Title: Error SSL_connect in MFC
Dear all,
I always get error when I use SSL_connect in microsoft platform using MFC. If I use SSL_get_error, I got error code 2.
If I use GetLastError, I got 10035 error code.
Why does this happen? And how to resolve this?
Best Regards
Title: Re: Converting PEM file to PKCS12 or PFX for the MacOS (Not Mac OSx)...
Importing root certs into Mac OS clients has similar problems as adding client certs, use Netscape 7 to avoid trouble.
Am 2002-10-25 16:26 Uhr schrieb "Auteria Wally Winzer Jr." unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
has anyon
Hello.
I'm considering using OpenSSL in my application. So I have read "The
SSL Protocol Version 3.0" at
http://wp.netscape.com/eng/ssl3/draft302.txt . But I still can't
understand, how during authentication phase
parties are actually authenticated ? I could only find exchange of
certificates
Title: Re: Converting PEM file to PKCS12 or PFX for the MacOS (Not Mac OSx)...
Hello, Wally,
as I don’t use Pre-X Mac OSes anymore, only something general:
The formats are portable, there should be no problem.
You may encounter another problem: Available clients on Mac, using openSSL client ce
Hi
Wally.
Pleasure, did it work?
Well
although I understand your plight towards other people (since I've been and
sometimes am on the same boat), I also understand why some times people don't respond.
Either
could be:
1. too
busy or away
2. Too
busy but still time to answer one or
Thanks for your response, but my problem was not related to the signature
but related to the time on my server (incorrect time).
So, thanks for your help anyway.
Michiels Olivier
Perry The Cynic wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:41:42AM +0200, Michiels Olivier wrote:
Hi,
my certi
thanks jose for your response. you're the only one that
took the time to do so. everyone else just sent me read
receipts.
wally
- Original Message -
From:
Jose Correia
(J)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002
23:42
Subject: RE: Converting PEM fi
19 matches
Mail list logo
