Re: run-checker NO DGRAM and test cases

2022-03-18 Thread Michael Richardson
Tomas Mraz wrote: >> Perhaps my use of:     IF[{- !$disabled{dgram} -}] >> >> is wrong in some way. > You've included the bio_write_test and bio_read_test also on the bare > PROGRAMS{noinst} assignment. You need to remove them from there. > Interestingly the http_test is

Re: run-checker NO DGRAM and test cases

2022-03-18 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 05:24 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Tomas Mraz wrote: >     >> Should the test *ALSO* ifdef itself out if OPENSSL_NO_DGRAM is >     >> defined? > >     > No, that's not necessary as they won't be built at all with the >     > build.info change above. > > I didn't fi

Re: run-checker NO DGRAM and test cases

2022-03-18 Thread Michael Richardson
Tomas Mraz wrote: >> Should the test *ALSO* ifdef itself out if OPENSSL_NO_DGRAM is >> defined? > No, that's not necessary as they won't be built at all with the > build.info change above. I didn't find this to be true. The source file still got built, and linked, and that fail