Re: alternative for x509 "name" field

2020-10-23 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 14:39 +0530, shiva kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Compared to OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 and above, in struct > x509_st , char *name field has been removed, what is the alternative > for it and what is the impact? can anyone please answer the query? Hi, although the name field was pr

alternative for x509 "name" field

2020-10-23 Thread shiva kumar
Hi, Compared to OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 and above, in struct x509_st , char *name field has been removed, what is the alternative for it and what is the impact? can anyone please answer the query? Thanks and regards Shivakumar