On Wed, Jun 01, 2005, Suram Chandra Sekhar wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you very much for the reply.
>
> I still have some confusion w.r.t to the version of the draft (PKCS#1 v2.0
> and PKCS#1 v2.1 specification).
>
> I was referring to rfc3447 (PKCS#1 v2.1) and the older draft
> PKCS #1: RSA Cryptogra
Hi,
Thank you very much for the reply.
I still have some confusion w.r.t to the version of the draft (PKCS#1
v2.0 and PKCS#1 v2.1 specification).
I was referring to rfc3447 (PKCS#1 v2.1) and the older draft
PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.0.
rfc3447(PKCS#1 v2.1) section 9.2 (EM
On Tue, May 31, 2005, Suram Chandra Sekhar wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you very much for the reply.
> I understood the schemes in PKCS#1v2.1.
>
> But some protocols wants the signature scheme as that defined in PKCS#1v2.0
> as
> it has only one encoding method defined EMSA_PKCS1v1.5.
>
> How can I do
Hi,
Thank you very much for the reply.
I understood the schemes in PKCS#1v2.1.
But some protocols wants the signature scheme as that defined in PKCS#1v2.0 as
it has only one encoding method defined EMSA_PKCS1v1.5.
How can I do this using Openssl 0.9.7c?
Regards
Suram
At 09:35 PM 5/30/2005, Dr
Hi all,
I want to know the sequence for signing and verifying a piece of data as
per PKCS1 v2.0 specification using signature algorithm identifier as SHA1
using openssl v 0.9.7c.
My understanding is that RSA_sign uses the PKCS1v2.1 specification.
Awaiting your valuable response..
Regards
Sura
On Mon, May 30, 2005, Suram Chandra Sekhar wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to know the sequence for signing and verifying a piece of data as
> per PKCS1 v2.0 specification using signature algorithm identifier as SHA1
> using openssl v 0.9.7c.
> My understanding is that RSA_sign uses the PKCS1v2.1 spec
