Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

2006/11/17, Andreas Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Juan Erbes schrieb: > But for RC1 the grub installer related bugs will be resolved? Yes, they will be, or are already; search Bugzilla and include FIXED bugs in your search. Please, let's not make this thread off-topic; it is used to track bugs wh

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Juan Erbes schrieb: > But for RC1 the grub installer related bugs will be resolved? Yes, they will be, or are already; search Bugzilla and include FIXED bugs in your search. Please, let's not make this thread off-topic; it is used to track bugs which are already in Bugzilla, known to be not yet f

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

2006/11/16, Andreas Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Juan Erbes schrieb: > Other bug I view in bugzilla (I found it in my system, but at this > time, it was registered in bugzilla) is with the hal-resmgr, and it > appear the last weekend as resolved, but the new package with the > fixes, do'nt appear i

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Juan Erbes schrieb: > Other bug I view in bugzilla (I found it in my system, but at this > time, it was registered in bugzilla) is with the hal-resmgr, and it > appear the last weekend as resolved, but the new package with the > fixes, do'nt appear in the repositories. Be patient, syncing the pack

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph Thiel schrieb: > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be elevated. Given that today is officially the last day where non-Blockers are allowed to be fixed, I'd like to point at the following t

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Anders Johansson schrieb: > On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:42, Andreas Hanke wrote: >> And another one: >> >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220274 >> >> I have heard that very often. I think it's a problem with the native >> x86_64 build and a duplicate of bug 219982 which is already "

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:42, Andreas Hanke wrote: > And another one: > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220274 > > I have heard that very often. I think it's a problem with the native > x86_64 build and a duplicate of bug 219982 which is already "Critical", > but a confirmation wo

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

And another one: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220274 I have heard that very often. I think it's a problem with the native x86_64 build and a duplicate of bug 219982 which is already "Critical", but a confirmation would be nice. Andreas -

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:45:25PM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote: > Christoph Thiel schrieb: > > [...] > > I'd like to point at bug 210935: > > The "istanbul" package is completely broken. The current summary of this > bug is just a tiny subset the brokenness: It also installs its gconf > schemas in

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph Thiel schrieb: > [...] I'd like to point at bug 210935: The "istanbul" package is completely broken. The current summary of this bug is just a tiny subset the brokenness: It also installs its gconf schemas into /etc/gconf which doesn't work at all and other ugly things. I will attach a

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Christoph Thiel wrote: >> Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are >> currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be elevated. >> I'd propose posting the bug numbers in this thread + giving a short >

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hi, Christoph Thiel wrote: > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be elevated. > I'd propose posting the bug numbers in this thread + giving a short > rationale. Please keep in mind that we should try

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:15:40AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Just filed another bug after notification from upstream. > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218948 > Resizing Vista NTFS partitions may keep Vista from booting > > It seems that current Windows Vista Release Ca

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Just filed another bug after notification from upstream. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218948 Resizing Vista NTFS partitions may keep Vista from booting It seems that current Windows Vista Release Candidates refuse to boot after any of the NTFS partitions they access are resized. De

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hi, https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212053 Set promote_secondaries=1 by default Rationale: If you have multiple IP addresses on one network card and you delete the primary address, all other IP addresses on this card vanish unexpectedly. This has bitten quite some people in the past.

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, Am Dienstag, 7. November 2006 01:35 schrieb Christoph Thiel: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:01:15AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > two other candidate to fix for 10.2 I missed yesterday - both have > > the fix already included: [...] > Both are fixed already in STABLE and will hit Beta2 ;)

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 03:51:57AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote: > On Saturday 04 November 2006 11:18, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be > > elevated. > > https://bugzil

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Saturday 04 November 2006 11:18, Christoph Thiel wrote: > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be > elevated. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=130452 (Update tomcat to current version)

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:01:15AM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > first: > two other candidate to fix for 10.2 I missed yesterday - both have the > fix already included: > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190084 > apparmor.vim missing > The apparmor syntax highlighting file for vi

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, first: two other candidate to fix for 10.2 I missed yesterday - both have the fix already included: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190084 apparmor.vim missing The apparmor syntax highlighting file for vim is missing (was removed in 10.1 because it was terribly outdated). I

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:31:04AM +0100, Christoph Thiel wrote: > Christian, many thanks for sharing these with us! > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:57PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > > > My candidates: > > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216485 > > opensuse-updater shows err

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:11:08PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 20:32 schrieb Christian Boltz: > > My candidates: > > Another one: > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193095 > Font of Gnome apps don't have antialiasing in KDE > Looks terribl

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christian, many thanks for sharing these with us! On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:57PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > My candidates: > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216485 > opensuse-updater shows error message in tooltip > zypp-checkpatches-wrapper does not get the suid-root bit

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 20:32 schrieb Christian Boltz: > My candidates: Another one: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193095 Font of Gnome apps don't have antialiasing in KDE Looks terrible :-( (The GIMP setup assistant looks even more terrible than the two screenshots in

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 18:18 schrieb Christoph Thiel: > while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), > I thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug > prioritization. My candidates: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216485 op

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On 2006/11/05 12:53 (GMT+-0500) Carl-Daniel Hailfinger apparently typed: > Christoph Thiel wrote: >> while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I >> thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug >> prioritization. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph Thiel wrote: > while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I > thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug > prioritization. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218122 Enable more than 15 partitions for libata. I have already writ

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sunday 05 November 2006 18:09, Christoph Thiel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:31:54PM +0200, Andras Mantia wrote: > > On Sunday 05 November 2006 13:56, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216982 > > > > Don't know how to solve, but at least there shoul

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:31:54PM +0200, Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday 05 November 2006 13:56, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216982 > > > Don't know how to solve, but at least there should be an Xgl update > > > for 10.1 that fixes the wrong %postun sc

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:03:57AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > What combination of settings there will lsit the bugs with the severity > level(s) you want reviewed? I was looking for hiding bugs in the Major/Normal/Minor/Enhancement range. > > > I surely hope I don't have to live with an

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sunday 05 November 2006 13:56, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216982 > > Don't know how to solve, but at least there should be an Xgl update > > for 10.1 that fixes the wrong %postun script so that at least those > > users who install patches regularly can

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Randall R Schulz schrieb: > OK, "severity." What I was really looking for is a way to see a listing > of these bugs. I tried to generate a list, but apparently I'm using the > Bugzilla Advanced Search feature incorrectly, 'cause I get zero > listings. > > What combination of settings there will

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Cristoph, On Sunday 05 November 2006 03:37, Christoph Thiel wrote: > ... > > > > Where does one see this status indication? And how does one alter > > or influence it? > > What do you mean by "status indication"? If you are talking about bug > severity, I'd like to ask you to refrain from changing

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Andreas, first of all, many thanks for the extensive list! On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:41:24AM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote: > Christoph Thiel schrieb: > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be eleva

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:06:32PM +0100, Martin Schlander wrote: > Lørdag 04 november 2006 20:31 skrev Randall R Schulz: > > > Where does one see this status indication? And how does one alter or > > > influence it? > > > > I'd still like to hear answers to these questions. > > Go to any bug, thi

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be > > elevated. I'd propose posting the bug numbers in this thread + giving > > a short rat

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, Marc Collin wrote: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202133 If it's not fixed, there is no X.org on Pegasos PPC. That would make openSUSE on this platform quite useless... Bye, novell support opensuse don't think a lot of client use ppc According to my download statisti

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph Thiel schrieb: > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be elevated. > I'd propose posting the bug numbers in this thread + giving a short > rationale. Please keep in mind that we should try to

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lørdag 04 november 2006 18:18 skrev Christoph Thiel: >> openSUSE 10.2 is going to be released rather soon. With the current bug >> count of 910 open bugs filed for 10.2, we will certainly have to postpone >> fixing some of them to 10.3. >> >> Therefor

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Le samedi 4 novembre 2006 14:31, Peter Czanik a écrit : > Hello, > > Christoph Thiel wrote: > > while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I > > thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug > > prioritization. > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Stefan, On Saturday 04 November 2006 13:25, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:05:25PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:38, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > > Randall > > > > > > You don't know the details, why we switched to newer releases of > > > X.Org a

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:05:25PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:38, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > Randall > > > > You don't know the details, why we switched to newer releases of > > X.Org and freetype2. And no, we will not discuss all decisions for > > software updat

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Stefan, On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:38, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > Randall > > You don't know the details, why we switched to newer releases of > X.Org and freetype2. And no, we will not discuss all decisions for > software updates. Especially when there are legal issues. So you want to enlist ou

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Randall You don't know the details, why we switched to newer releases of X.Org and freetype2. And no, we will not discuss all decisions for software updates. Especially when there are legal issues. Best regards, Stefan On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:12:36PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Stefan, >

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Stefan, On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:00, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:48:02AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > Stefan, > > > > On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:15, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > > I surely

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Lørdag 04 november 2006 20:31 skrev Randall R Schulz: > > Where does one see this status indication? And how does one alter or > > influence it? > > I'd still like to hear answers to these questions. Go to any bug, this for instance: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216097 The status i

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:48:02AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Stefan, > > On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:15, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > I surely hope I don't have to live with an X server that dies every > > > couple of h

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Lørdag 04 november 2006 18:18 skrev Christoph Thiel: > openSUSE 10.2 is going to be released rather soon. With the current bug > count of 910 open bugs filed for 10.2, we will certainly have to postpone > fixing some of them to 10.3. > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, t

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Saturday 04 November 2006 09:37, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Christoph, > > On Saturday 04 November 2006 09:18, Christoph Thiel wrote: > > ... > > > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that > > are currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should > > be elev

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hello, Christoph Thiel wrote: while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug prioritization. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202133 If it's not fixed, there is no X.org on Pegasos PPC. Tha

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Stefan, On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:15, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > I surely hope I don't have to live with an X server that dies every > > couple of hours > > (). > > Still cra

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:37:50AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > I surely hope I don't have to live with an X server that dies every > couple of hours (). Still crashing the last RPM you tried? Please comment in bugzilla. > And the beta1 fon

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph Thiel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I > thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug > prioritization. > > openSUSE 10.2 is going to be released rather soon. With the current bug > count of 910 open

Re: [opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Christoph, On Saturday 04 November 2006 09:18, Christoph Thiel wrote: > ... > > Therefore, I'd like to ask YOU to help identify those bugs, that are > currently hiding under the radar (ie. aren't "red") and should be > elevated. I'd propose posting the bug numbers in this thread + giving > a short

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE 10.2 bug prioritization

Hi everyone, while going through the openSUSE 10.2 "RED bugs" (Blocker/Criticals), I thought it might be a good idea to ask for some help regarding bug prioritization. openSUSE 10.2 is going to be released rather soon. With the current bug count of 910 open bugs filed for 10.2, we will certainly