On Thursday, March 01, 2012 13:02:26 Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> On Thursday 01 March 2012 11.36:44 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My technical reply on this:
> > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2012-02/msg01470.html
> >
> > my google+ reply on the style of his rant:
> > https://plus.google
On Thursday 01 March 2012 11.36:44 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My technical reply on this:
> http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2012-02/msg01470.html
>
> my google+ reply on the style of his rant:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115459846930982668806/posts/P36Nw61h75u
>
>
> SUSE Security is
Hi,
My technical reply on this:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2012-02/msg01470.html
my google+ reply on the style of his rant:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/115459846930982668806/posts/P36Nw61h75u
SUSE Security is working to make openSUSE both secure and usable,
with both in mind when we do
Thanks Bryen,
I'm not a subscriber opensuse-gnome list. I see the review.
Sorry for duplicates.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 02:23 -0200, Raul Libório wrote:
>> So I agree with him. Certain features daily should not have so many
>> restrictions.
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 02:23 -0200, Raul Libório wrote:
> So I agree with him. Certain features daily should not have so many
> restrictions.
>
> 'Kill yourself now' - Torvalds throws openSUSE security tantrum
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/29/torvalds_tantrum_opensuse/
>
> and, g+ (Torval
So I agree with him. Certain features daily should not have so many
restrictions.
'Kill yourself now' - Torvalds throws openSUSE security tantrum
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/29/torvalds_tantrum_opensuse/
and, g+ (Torvalds)
https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts
--
Raul Li
