On Thursday, November 10, 2011 09:16:36 AM jdd wrote:
> Le 10/11/2011 16:56, Roger Luedecke a écrit :
> > I really really dislike connect.
>
> don't know who choosed it
>
> > Kablink is a far superior replacement to the current system used for
> > connect. https://features.opensuse.org/312952
>
Le 10/11/2011 16:56, Roger Luedecke a écrit :
I really really dislike connect.
don't know who choosed it
Kablink is a far superior replacement to the current system used for connect.
https://features.opensuse.org/312952
the fact that kablink is the opensource part of a Novell project is go
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 08:40:22 AM jdd wrote:
> Le 10/11/2011 00:05, Pascal Bleser a écrit :
> > We certainly need a better infrastructure, as our communication
> > is rather non-functional in many ways, but adding even more
> > tools into the mix is something we really have to think about
Le 10/11/2011 01:24, Jos Poortvliet a écrit :
All I can think about is...
http://xkcd.com/927/
how true :-))
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgxog7_clip-l-ombre-et-la-lumiere-3-bad-pigeons_music
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGgv_ZFtV14
--
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Le 10/11/2011 00:05, Pascal Bleser a écrit :
We certainly need a better infrastructure, as our communication
is rather non-functional in many ways, but adding even more
tools into the mix is something we really have to think about
twice.
agree.
and don't forget connect. If we have to work on
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 05:53:34 PM Rajko M. wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 06:24:12 PM Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> ...
>
> > > What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
>
> ...
>
> > All I can think about is...
> >
> > http://xkcd.com/927/
>
> +1
>
> One more site wil
Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2011 15:00:08 Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> So is there anything that must be done ?
>> Anything that you cannot do yourself for that ?
>> Any sort of "ownership" of that section that can be shared
>> across several people ? (to prevent a bus factor too
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 06:24:12 PM Jos Poortvliet wrote:
...
> > What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
...
> All I can think about is...
>
> http://xkcd.com/927/
+1
One more site will compete with other for user attention, and due to lack of
qualified answers will give r
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 05:42:38 Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
>
> Ubuntu has one:
>
> http://askubuntu.com/
All I can think about is...
http://xkcd.com/927/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 03:05:27 PM Pascal Bleser wrote:
> On 2011-11-09 10:24:12 (-0800), Roger Luedecke
wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 01:59:54 AM Pascal Bleser wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Sure, why not, but keep in mind that it will make even more
> > > communication channels -
On 2011-11-09 10:24:12 (-0800), Roger Luedecke wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 01:59:54 AM Pascal Bleser wrote:
[...]
> > Sure, why not, but keep in mind that it will make even more
> > communication channels -- I believe we already have way too
> > many, as we're having a really hard tim
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 01:59:54 AM Pascal Bleser wrote:
> On 2011-11-09 13:41:17 (+0400), Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 November 2011 09:36:14 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> > > > Note also that the site already has sections about Unix&Linux,
> > > > programming and system administrat
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 15:00:08 Pascal Bleser wrote:
> So is there anything that must be done ?
> Anything that you cannot do yourself for that ?
> Any sort of "ownership" of that section that can be shared
> across several people ? (to prevent a bus factor too high ;))
>
> Would you have
On 2011-11-09 14:03:49 (+0400), Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2011 13:59:54 Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
> > (I wonder why that last comment is relevant in any way?)
> >
> > Sure, why not, but keep in mind that it will make even more
> > communication channels -- I believe we already
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 06:27:29 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> Is there any way to host it locally or something? We have so many resources
> scattered to the four winds, I'm very wary of adding yet another thing.
I suggest considering this one:
http://www.osqa.net/
It is GPLv3 and can be downl
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 13:59:54 Pascal Bleser wrote:
> (I wonder why that last comment is relevant in any way?)
>
> Sure, why not, but keep in mind that it will make even more
> communication channels -- I believe we already have way too
> many, as we're having a really hard time getting i
On 2011-11-09 13:41:17 (+0400), Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2011 09:36:14 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> > > Note also that the site already has sections about Unix&Linux, programming
> > > and system administration. So there should be some professionals available
> > > willing and ab
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 09:36:14 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> > Note also that the site already has sections about Unix&Linux, programming
> > and system administration. So there should be some professionals available
> > willing and able to answer from the very beginning, while if you create a
>
My personal opinion would be, help the admins on forums instead of
creating a new spin. One reason because, that would help most of the
people on forums who are already helping the people and its the same
people who help always. So creating a new spin is not a good idea even
though lucative rather
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 06:42:49 PM Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2011 06:27:29 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> > > It would be great having such a service.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:42, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > What about having an answers sit
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 06:27:29 Roger Luedecke wrote:
> > It would be great having such a service.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:42, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
> > >
> > > Ubuntu has one:
> > >
> > > http://askubun
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 05:47:35 PM Raul Libório wrote:
> GREAT idea of Ubuntu Team!
> It would be great having such a service.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:42, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
> >
> > Ubuntu has one:
> >
> > http:
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 05:47:35 Raul Libório wrote:
> GREAT idea of Ubuntu Team!
> It would be great having such a service.
There are already "Ask Ubuntu" and "Unix and Linux" sites there.
Also a site for Android (it appeared after that for Ubuntu).
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-mar
GREAT idea of Ubuntu Team!
It would be great having such a service.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:42, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
>
> Ubuntu has one:
>
> http://askubuntu.com/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+unsubscr...@opensu
Hi!
What about having an answers site at stackexchange?
Ubuntu has one:
http://askubuntu.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+ow...@opensuse.org
25 matches
Mail list logo
