Re: [opensuse-marketing] Artwork repository license (was: Artwork and marketing repository)

2011-02-16 Thread Helen South
The most pragmatic solution, and the fairest, IMHO, is that the > attribution should go to "the openSUSE project". > We probably should mention that explicitly somewhere, and also > that by committing content to the repository, you accept that: > * the work is still owned by you, and by whomever m

[opensuse-marketing] Artwork repository license (was: Artwork and marketing repository)

2011-02-16 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2011-02-16 10:29:42 (+0100), Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On 02/16/2011 10:04 AM, jdd wrote: [...] >> That's why I beg we should (on the marketting team, at least), have >> some sort of "attribution to the marketting team", that mean each >> author accepts that on collective works the attribution i

[opensuse-marketing] Artwork repository license (was: Artwork and marketing repository)

2011-02-16 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2011-02-16 11:28:35 (+0100), jdd wrote: > Le 16/02/2011 10:29, Bruno Friedmann a écrit : > >> * "Made by the openSUSE team" > > It could be made by others, who just want to contribute one time, or for a > > specific reason. > > Would they become de-facto member of openSUSE team ? > > We're al