On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 10:34 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 07:42:36 pm Manu Gupta wrote:
> > Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
> > SUSE Studio
> > 1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
> > it.
> > 3. So
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 10:34:02 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 07:42:36 pm Manu Gupta wrote:
> > Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
> > SUSE Studio
> > 1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
> > it.
> > 3.
On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 07:42:36 pm Manu Gupta wrote:
> Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
> SUSE Studio
> 1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
> it.
> 3. So what about the derivatives we have
> 4. We promote it, but is not wro
On 1/4/2011 1:53 PM, Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:12 +0530, Manu Gupta wrote:
>> Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
>> SUSE Studio
>> 1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
>> it.
>> 3. So what about the deriva
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:12 +0530, Manu Gupta wrote:
> Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
> SUSE Studio
> 1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
> it.
> 3. So what about the derivatives we have
> 4. We promote it, but is not wrong?
>
Recently a discussion with Alberto P got me into afew details about
SUSE Studio
1. I add a single package, then it is not openSUSE, I have to debrand
it.
3. So what about the derivatives we have
4. We promote it, but is not wrong?
5. Can we have better rules from openSUSE with respect to SUSE Stu
