On 28 September 2016 at 10:30, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> [Cc'd lede-dev@]
>
> On 2016-09-28 10:03, Luka Perkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:46:51AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-28 00:56, Luka Perkov wrote:
>>> > Hi Felix,
>>> >
>>> > it seems there is some divergence from the Gi
A long shot, but are there any news from Marvel legal department? Would
sending them a case of good beer solve this? :)
On Sunday, 27 September 2015, Weedy wrote:
> Did this die?
> On 22 Dec 2014 9:06 am, "Tomer Eliyahu" > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are software developers, part of Marvell's cell
Nice that you checked... I would understand this stance from a company
that doesn't rely on so much open source software without which they
wouldn't even exists. Shame, just shame.
On 30 November 2015 at 09:48, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/2015 09:38, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>> Ben West [2015-
Hi David,
did you manage to get OpenWrt up and running on RouterBOARD mAP 2n ?
Cheers,
Valent.
On 28 January 2015 at 02:35, David Hutchison wrote:
> The problem is there is no yaffs2 filesystem like typical
> RouterBOARD's, it's all one 16mb SPI flash chip.
>
> If it expects kernel, would renami
at image creation time so
that they can be included in the SquashFS from the beginning. Maybe a
cross-compiling guru can enlighten us?
On 2 July 2015 at 11:25, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> Will make time to update Python :)
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:51 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.
> Because there is only one pysical hardware and the hardware can only be
> tuned to one channel. The STA interface needs to look for the channel
> the AP is on and as long as the channel is not determined we can not
> start an AP.
I think that all of us understand limitations of one physical hard
I don't understad how that script even works! Here is the script from
that blog post - http://pastebin.com/ihNAfbcr
Why use wifi-iface[99] ? Who has 100 wifi interfaces? When I manually
run "uci show wireless.@wifi-iface[99]" I get "uci: Entry not found"
as expected.
__
On 15 July 2015 at 12:37, Yaroslav Syrytsia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is a known issue, some descriptions you can find there -
> http://vonger.cn/?p=1778
> I guess it is not depend on a driver or hw.
Yaroslav thanks man you saved me lots of headache! :)
>From reading blog post you linked this seams t
Hi,
Atheros hardware supports multiple wireless interfaces, and ath9k
driver takes advantage of that.
What is not clear to me is why if you have two interfaces, one in sta
mode and other in ap mode then ap interface isn't available until sta
interface is connected to upstream AP.
Why? Is there an
After some more research I found that FreeBSD recently added TDMA
support to their ath driver [1]. Friend of mine just tried to use it
on some cheap TP-Link device but currently TDMA support is broken but
it will be fixed in next few days.
[1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath%284%29
__
Sorry for not sending all links at once (some consider it spammy), but
I also see that NETSHe guys extensively tested different size time
slots and did benchmarks and comparisons:
http://netshe.stasoft.net/node/47
And here are their results:
http://netshe.ru/files/doc/en/test_results_28032015.pdf
I have your found out that NETSHe offers some of their firmwares for
free download and testing with TDMA enbled driver:
http://netshe.ru/files/NETSHe-3.0/
On 14 July 2015 at 10:47, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Sorry to jump in on an older tdma thread, but I found two interesting thi
Sorry to jump in on an older tdma thread, but I found two interesting things.
It looks like Russian company called NETSHe have made TDMA driver:
http://www.netshe.ru/files/doc/en/TDMA_brief_en.pdf
http://www.netshe.ru/tdma
And also there was a intesting job posting for developing TDMA driver
for
Probably no body checked until now if it works and devs went with safe
choice. Just my 2c.
On 11 July 2015 at 18:51, Matthias Schiffer
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that OpenWrt currently uses the soft-float ABI in the
> Raspberry Pi images. Is there a specific reason hard float is not used,
> even
.06.2015 um 14:57 schrieb valent.turko...@gmail.com:
>>
>> Does micro-python have some alternative or replacement for pyserial?
>
>
> you can use stty[1] from busybox to configure the tty.
> After that every program can use regular read/write calls...
>
> [1] htt
On 24 October 2014 at 11:10, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> python-mini is now just python.
Thanks for clarification, I'll add that info on Python OpenWrt Wiki page [1].
I tried installing python package on Caos Calmer rc2 and I get a bunch
of dependencies installed automatically and they use up bu
Does micro-python have some alternative or replacement for pyserial?
On 31 October 2014 at 08:52, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> python has been moved to Github
> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/tree/master/lang/python
>
> python-mini will be rebooted;
>
> the whole python package needs a bit of
When will these patched be available in trunk? I have few of these
devices ordered so I can test them once they arrive in few days.
Thanks.
On 21 June 2015 at 22:42, Matthias Schiffer
wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
>> TP-Link ships wr740n v5.0 to Romania (so probably everyw
Petre wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 06:54 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Daniel thank you!
>> Who will add V5 so
>> it gets build?
>
> OpenWrt developers of course :)
> I tested my little patch, it works.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valent.
>>
>
Daniel thank you!
Daniel can you please share firmware you have build so I can join in testing.
I still don't see V5 images being build in trunk. Who will add V5 so
it gets build?
Cheers,
Valent.
On 8 June 2015 at 17:47, Daniel Petre wrote:
> TP-Link ships wr740n v5.0 to Romania (so probably ev
It's not just you! http://downloads.openwrt.org looks down from here
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://downloads.openwrt.org/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/op
Found about this mirror so helping to spread the word -
http://bo.mirror.garr.it/pub/1/openwrt/
On 12 June 2015 at 12:29, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> It's not just you! http://downloads.openwrt.org looks down from here
>
> http://www.downforeveryoneorj
Awesome news Sergey,
will this patch be applied to latest trunk anytime soon so that I can test it?
Can you just briefly explain how will it be possible to track erase
block count once this patch is applied?
Regards,
Valent.
On 20 May 2015 at 08:38, Sergey Zakharchenko wrote:
> Hello Valent,
>
> Try dstat. you can select it in the utilities menu.
> http://dag.wiee.rs/home-made/dstat/
>
> Pepe
I tried dstat also, with "dstat -r" and with "dstat --disk-util"
options, nothing.
So far my conclusion is that utilies that works with block devices
can't work with mtd partitions. And other issu
0.02 0.03 0.21 9786 69721
Any ideas?
On 18 May 2015 at 11:45, José Vázquez wrote:
> Try iostat (selectable in busybox). Maybe is what are you looking for.
>
> 2015-05-17 0:40 GMT+02:00, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> :
>> Here is some interesting
Here is some interesting info I found using mtdinfo tool:
# mtdinfo /dev/mtd5
mtd5
Name: rootfs_data
Type: nor
Eraseblock size:65536 bytes, 64.0 KiB
Amount of eraseblocks: 104 (6815744 bytes, 6.5 MiB)
Minimum input/output
Hi,
OpenWrt devices use mtd partitions, but I don't have enough knowledge
on how to track IO activity, especially number of writes.
I know that mtd device isn't a block device, but what confuses me that
I see mtdblock devices also. Do they simulate block device? Why?
I have used iostat but it is
Hi,
has anyone got their hands on Firefly FireWrt [1] with Mediatek
MT7621A dual core MIPS 1004Kc processor?
Specs look really interesting, but my concern is wifi driver maturity
and general reliability. Any comments on reliability of Mediatek
platform?
I haven't had experience with and device us
Hahahaha, I'm so embarrassed :) And thank you very, very much!
On 25 March 2015 at 12:23, Yousong Zhou wrote:
Here is a link to this issue on the forum (it is not only me):
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=269850
It looks like pppd after sending request for IP addre
On 25 March 2015 at 08:31, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 14:21, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I don't see lots of people using PPPoE with OpenWrt, at least PPPoE is
>> not mentioned much on forums.
>>
>> My first opportunity to
Hi,
I don't see lots of people using PPPoE with OpenWrt, at least PPPoE is
not mentioned much on forums.
My first opportunity to use PPPoE with OpenWrt was yesterday and I
lost few hours on troubleshooting few issues and finally arrived at
conclusion that PPPoE could be broken in Barrier Breaker.
After reading comments from all of you I thought of deploying
additional devices just as wifi analyzers, as few of you suggested. I
have used kismet before, but only as standalone wifi scanner, but
there is also an option to deploy kismet-drones and monitor multiple
endpoints from central kismet se
On 22 March 2015 at 10:01, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:33 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> On 21 March 2015 at 15:49, Janne Cederberg
>> wrote:
>> > Greetings all!
>> > Been searching around and found for example
On 21 March 2015 at 15:49, Janne Cederberg wrote:
> Greetings all!
> Been searching around and found for example OpenWISP but thought I'd
> ask the list as well: is there some opensource management software for
> OpenWrt that could control a set of multiple OpenWrt AP's on the same
> SSID; so basi
On 10 March 2015 at 21:26, Gergely Kiss wrote:
> Hi Valent,
>
> first of all, I strongly disagree with people claiming that OpenWrt sucks
> because it doesn't. For me it rather looks like a well-maintained, rapidly
> improving project with a great number of actively supported hardware and
> quite
Hi,
just stumbled upon this interesting job listing that is appropriate
for people on this list:
https://www.elance.com/j/outdoor-wireless-open-wrt-atheros-development/69183838/?backurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWxhbmNlLmNvbS9yL2pvYnMvcS1vcGVud3J0Lw==
Hope somebody of you guys gets this and also that we g
> This is a long way of saying, that if performance sucks on OpenWrt you
> should blame Atheros and Broadcom for not giving you (OpenWrt
> community) high quality open source drivers!
First thanks to Alex, Charlie, Kathy and Fernando for pointing out
that Atheros works together with Linux and Open
On 10 March 2015 at 02:52, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Why it OpenWrt slower than stock firmware? I can help by shining a bit
> > of light onto this subject. I'm developing custom firwmares based on
>
> I'm curi
Hi all,
I see this or similar question of forums all the time and I have
answered it few times. I suggest we open a wiki page and contribute an
answer.
Here is how I usually reply to similar questions, please give your
comments in your replies:
Why it OpenWrt slower than stock firmware? I can he
Who is Mediawiki admin? Somebody was messing about media namespaces and
blocked some namespaces so that they don't have permission to accept
uploaded images.
For example "toh:tplink" namespace - http://i.imgur.com/quWSV4L.png
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, valent.tur
sG.png
http://i.imgur.com/tz51VHE.png
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any ideas why is this happening with my account? Can you please check user
> rights for wiki account "valentt"
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Any ideas why is this happening with my account? Can you please check user
rights for wiki account "valentt"
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
> http://i
Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
http://i.imgur.com/2NbQBxc.png
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> upload should be possible for any registered user within the media
> namespace.
>
>
> ~ Jow
> ___
> openwr
Linksys/Belking marketing is again doing one thing and saying another?
This time they say that WRT1200AC router is open source:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-2015-linksys-1200ac-an-inexpensive-open-source-802-11ac-wi-fi-router/
I have tracked progress with WRT1900AC and saw how they failed to
I have resorted to building docker image with openwrt imagebuilder and all
necessary tools in order to make this issue go away and to make building
images portable and reproducable.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody
Nobody is seeing these kind of messages?
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> after downloading and unpacking ImageBuilder 14.07 on Lenovo T440s running
> Fedora 21 I get "no valid architecture" errors.
&
Hi,
after downloading and unpacking ImageBuilder 14.07 on Lenovo T440s running
Fedora 21 I get "no valid architecture" errors.
But if I download same ImageBuilder file on my vps build process works
without errors, why?
Here is full log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rQUHNkfe
and here is a snippe
Hi,
wiki admins please enable upload rights for "valentt" account so that I can
continue contributing to wiki.
Thanks,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thanks!
I guess I'm used to doing it the old way and usually documentation is
quite lagging and I usually update old info on the wiki all the
time... Thanks once more!
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Matthias Strubel
wrote:
> On 10/18/2014 08:45 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
&
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Steven Barth wrote:
> Please see https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=52219
>
Because of this decission ImageBuilder is now completely useless in
Barrier Breaker 14.07. I tried building new image with few extra
packages but they aren't included in ImageBuil
Hmm, I just noticed that BB RC3 has enormus toolchain file for mips (the
one I use most often) [1] when compared to AA 12.09 toolchain [2]
40MB vs 160MB
Should I be worried that something is broken or is this quadruple size
increase planed?
[1]
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07
I'll definitely give cross-compiling for mips architecture (I have
lots of AR9331 based routers around) a go and let you know how it
worked out, or if it didn't work out.
Does MicryPython have support for serial communication as Python has
with PySerial? What I mostly need is some simple communica
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Etienne Champetier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The interest of GitHub is that it's simpler for new comer
> I really think mailing list + patchwork is the way to go for the base/core
> part of OpenWrt
>
> What would be the advantage of GitHub for you Valent?
I'm definitely a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Martin Babutzka
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there is some confusion about manual building and the Imagebuilder. At
> least in my case the RC3 Image Builder reacts to the feeds-script like that:
> ./scripts/feeds update
> Unable to open feeds configuration at ./script
I just installed Barrier Breaker RC3 and opkg snows that nano,
picocom, python, tmux and few others I complained about are available!
Whom do I need to buy a case of beer? It looks like they are all
available via standard package repo.
But if I try to build image via ImageBuilder these packages st
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:07 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I used Imagebuilder from 2013-11 to build custom OpenWrt firmware for
> Carambola 2 ar71xx based devices.
>
> Today I saw that BB 14.07 RC2 has been released so I tried it, and was
> chocked that so many of CRUCI
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 08:41 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Please consider switching from svn to git, and then if possible
>> connecting openwrt git with github so patches are synced between them.
>
> http://git.ope
Please consider switching from svn to git, and then if possible
connecting openwrt git with github so patches are synced between them.
Thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Am I reading the OpenSSL benchmark table correctly?!? There is an
entry for Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite (e100) but not for OpenWrt but
OpenSSL benchmark with EdgeOS 1.1.0 and it gives over 100MB/s for
SHA256 WITHOUT hardware encryption!!! What kind of sorcery is this?
:)))
This device is a MONSTER. M
>
> Yes, definitely. But based on the above experience, as soon as I heard
> about MicroPython project, I put on hold any Squirrel activity, instead
> motivating MicroPython author to release it as OpenSource sooner rather
> than latter, and since the code was released, I'm fervently hacking on
> i
Nice news for this new release. I wanted to try it out and give you
feedback but can't even build image because of missing packages.
These are packages I can't do without:
bluez-libs, bluez-utils, coreutils, coreutils-stat, coreutils-stty,
coreutils-timeout, glib2, i2c-tools, nano, ntpclient, picoc
I used Imagebuilder from 2013-11 to build custom OpenWrt firmware for
Carambola 2 ar71xx based devices.
Today I saw that BB 14.07 RC2 has been released so I tried it, and was
chocked that so many of CRUCIAL packages are missing!
I immediately opened new bug:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17496
Yes please, this is very crutial tool to all of us who use serial
connections! I use ti all the time to troubleshoot and configure
bluetooth serial modules (HC-05).
I just use it with this command "picocom -b 38400 -c /dev/ttyATH0"
___
openwrt-devel mail
Hi devs,
after listening to Amp Hour podcast ep 202 [1], interview With Brandon
Harris from Electric Imp, which was impressive I heard something
really alarming.
Whey were using Lua in their product previous to launch, but they were
so strongly againgst shipping it with Lua because they realized t
Just found out that Nanobeam uses AR9342. From what I remember there
were few devices on Wiki that support OpenWrt and have AR9342 SoC.
Can't confirm right now because Wiki is down. Ngnix error just keep
popping up.
There is also a ticket open - https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/16796
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:06 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> did anybody get their hands on Ubiquiti Nanobeam equipment? Nanobeam is very
> similar to Nanobridge but it has improved radio and antenna design, and
> faster cpu.
>
> Guys on the Ubiquiti forums are reall
I have looked mailing list archive, on OpenWrt forums and on wiki for
information how to get support for SLIC (FXO/FXS) PCM telecom
interface that AR9331 has but is not supported currently in OpenWrt.
I have found this wiki page that has some info about SLIC, but I can't
find who the author is:
ht
the noise on the list.
Cheers,
Valent.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also
> SoC, from Ubnt forums:
> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-
I got a batch of 10 Nanostation loco M2 devices and can confim that they
run OpenWrt without problem.
I have updated OpenWrt Wiki with all information I have found out so far:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Moses F wrote:
> ## Please do no
Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also
SoC, from Ubnt forums:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2
So nobody from dev team has worked on these new Ubiquiti devices?
Got first reply from Ubiquiti support:
"Hi Valent,
Thanks for getting in touch with us!
Yes, we have come up with the new board for these devices. Just for
easy understanding the devices with the xw firmware run on the latest
motherboard. eg: http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5. You'll
s
-Firmware.html
Maybe it takes some time for the paperwork to clear and to be show on FCC
website?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> On 03.06.2014 00:05 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014?
Gregor from wlan slovenia says that new Nanostation devices now have
Atheros ar934x and not ar71xx any more...
Is ar934x supported in OpenWrt?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:05 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M
Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014? Is
it true that Ubiquiti changes SoC type and that current model is not
supported in OpenWrt?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org
Depending on the type of node usage would be 5, 10 and 15W for three
typical nodes. Hope this helps.
--
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent
How do you calculate ideal battery for solar nodes? I know that it depends
on how much routers there are planned. But for example let's use solar node
that has one nanostation nanobridge for unplink and picostation for AP.
I guess that 50W solar panel should be enough, right? But how big should
th
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, David Hutchison wrote:
> I was able to get the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus to boot into OpenWRT
> today, however I need some assistance writing a patch for it. There
> are two things that need to happen:
>
> First of all, this is how I got it to work:
>
> Modify tar
I would like to help with sysadmin task, who can I contact?
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:32 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is really bad guys;
> https://www.diigo.com/item/image/1aki/wrth
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:16 PM, vale
It is really bad guys;
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/1aki/wrth
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:16 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm tracking few websites with uptime webapp on RedHats free instance of
> Openshift and it works awesome...
>
I'm tracking few websites with uptime webapp on RedHats free instance of
Openshift and it works awesome...
I see that OpenWrt Wiki has lots of stability issues:
http://i.imgur.com/pkOIVTX.png
Who are sysadmins who take care of the wiki? Is there anything I can help
with?
_
Did anybody package updated version of bluetooth packages via this patch?
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/2746/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
did anybody get their hands on Ubiquiti Nanobeam equipment? Nanobeam is
very similar to Nanobridge but it has improved radio and antenna design,
and faster cpu.
Guys on the Ubiquiti forums are really stoked about how great they work:
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/Na
Hi, is there a chance of getting rtc kernel modue for ds1307 ?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Is there any plan to swith from syslogng to rsyslog in some future OpenWrt
release?
I'm investigating how to log my devices and it seams that syslogng is
subpar solution on devices that have intermittent connection.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but with syslogng when connection goes down
syslo
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 12/01/14 11:09, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I see no mention of this router on dev mailing list, so is this article
>> true:
>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/
>> 01/linksys-
I see no mention of this router on dev mailing list, so is this article
true:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/01/linksys-resurrects-classic-blue-router-with-open-source-and-300-price/
and also in tekzilla video Linksys/Belkin claims that this router will have
OpenWrt support fir
Hi,
default busybox is missing setsid tool that is used creating bacground
daemon processes.
Is there a reason why it is not included by default?
If there are no good reasons I'll write a simple patch that would
include it by default in next build releases.
Are you using some other ways to creat
Thanks. Using some (maybe flawed) logic I deducted that bluetooth
devices should all have product='a12/1/*' so I'll match with that.
Hope this info helps also others reading this later...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http
sorry for the missing link:
[1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/hotplug#troubleshoot
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> On 23 December 2013 04:26, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki docume
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 23 December 2013 04:26, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki documentation is
>> lacking some basic examples how could it be used further by advanced
Hi,
I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki documentation is
lacking some basic examples how could it be used further by advanced
users (not developers).
One use case would be to trigger some action when some usb device is
being connected or disconnected... how could procd be used in su
I have tested bluetooth also on wr703n tplink router which is atheros
based and I also get kernel panic crashes...
This looks like badly broken usb stack or bluetooth stack issue. Any
other ideas?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> The crash / disconnect issues are more likely related to the infamous
> dwc_otg host driver. It is unlikely to be a problem with the bluetooth
> stack itself.
>
> ~ Jow
Jow you are right, it looks like it is general usb issue and not only
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Martijn Zilverschoon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What happens when you try to connect the bluetooth dongle trough an
> active powered hub?
>
> -Fried
First I switched to trunk and got much better results, now l2ping
doesn't cause kernel panic just stops pinging after some t
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> can you try with an external powered hub ?
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>
> I have two powered usb hubs, one cheap chinese and premiu
Hi,
can you try with an external powered hub ?
John
I have two powered usb hubs, one cheap chinese and premium DLink one,
and when I use them then usb bluetooth dongle doesn't even came up!
I can't get it up with command "hciconfig hci0 up" any ideas why?!?
__
Hi,
I have no previous experience with bluetooth on openwrt but from my
experience in last few days of serious testing bluetooth stack on
openwrt I can only say with really high confidence that bluetooth is
badly broken on openwrt (atleast on one platform).
Do you have experience with stable bluet
Hi guys, not sure if this issue I'm seeing is a know one or not. I
searched for similar bugs but haven't seen this.
I'll open a new bug if it is needed.
I'm using Carambola [1] device with Attitude Adjustment 12.09 which is
based upon Ralink chipset.
Usb bluetooth dongle gets disconnected every
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:05 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi guys and galls (if present),
> how do you compile image for Carambola when it's target is missing?
>
> ls target/linux/ramips/rt305x/profiles/
> 00-default.mk allnet.mk aztech.mk belkin.mk engenius.
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
