On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:42 PM, 臧美君 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > when choosing the middle nodes, it excludes the exit node and other middle > nodes first.
sorry, i'm saying it excludes the exit node and the other middle nodes first in the same path > > and then exclude itself if it's a or. and randomly choose a node in the > running routers list which contains all those routers only if it's now > running and valid and you think it's reliable enough. > so actually i don't see there's some policy to exlude those exit nodes > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Erilenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you run as an exit node, it's my understanding that you also act as a >> middleman node. Would it be possible, and would it be a good idea, to >> add an option such that you only act as an exit node? >> >> It seems a bit of a waste to use potential exit bandwidth as middleman >> relaying bandwidth when exit bandwdith is more scarce. >> >> -- >> Erilenz >> > >
