Simon,
An Oracle manager told me last November that they wouldn't have ejb-ql until
the summer, but Oracle is saying this is out in the _latest_ jdeveloper
version. Getting a handle on which version is actually released by Oracle
and which is "early access" is a bit dodgy. IIOP is also supposed t
Moving among different app servers, I still use ejb-ql functionality in the
ejb-jar.xml file, its
just that when it is deployed on Orion, I have to add the finder functionality to the
orion-ejb-jar.xml file. I think in 1.5.4, it deploys, it just doesn't do anything.
Cheers
Ray
--- Simon Stewar
Apologies, I probably didn't make myself sufficiently clear. With EJB
2.0, aren't finder queries meant to be specified in the ejb-jar.xml
file using EJB-QL? Consequently, Orions's lack of support for EJB-QL
means that it's currently not possible to write portable CMP EJBs.
Yes, I realise that you
(Sorry my last message got sent before I could finish it)
Ok there was a lot of talk about this IDE so I decided to go poke around and
look at it. I had been using Netbeans (Forte too) for a while, but always
found it to have either way too many things you can do with it, and
therefore you have
I take it from the comments that have been made that the "partial"
support for EJB 2.0 is really "partial" Is it possible to write my
finders in EJB-QL yet? I suspect not, but that'd be really
useful.
Also, I've written a couple of 2.x CMP Entity Beans that have a 1:*
relationship, and although
Simon -
No its not tricky, I write them all the time. Orion has always had a rather
sophisticated finder
mechanism to provide (at least) some of the functionality of ejb-ql. And I haven't
worked with the
JBoss 3.0 beta so I can't comment there.
Cheers
Ray
--- Simon Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:36:44PM -0800, The elephantwalker wrote:
> sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible.
Silly question, but doesn't this make writing EJB 2.0 CMP beans a
little tricky? And if it's not too far off topic, how does JBoss
compare?
Cheers,
Simon
--
"Dark under floor, hard to read,
JDeveloper9i is certainly not without bugs yet... I have used it professionally since
BETA3, because JDev is company policy, and since 9i is so much more stable than 3.2.3
(sad) ..
Let me put it this way, had i known of all the bugs in JDev9i or its precessor for
that matter, i'd went with a si
I hate the way it doesn't support folder hierarchies. The new one even less
than 3.2.3, which allowed one folder level per project. I don't see why not,
it seems like such a trivial thing.
-Original Message-
From: Joydeep Kamdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 16:11
To: Ori
