Hi All,
I have written a simple test web app that has two EntityEJB's (Groups and
Person, the relationship is 1-m) to learn more about using CMR with EJB 2.0
on Orion. All code compiles and archives fine using my usual Ant build
scripts...but when I deploy my .ear file to Orion, it res
just my 2c
On Thursday 28 March 2002 20:44, you wrote:
> ,
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full EJB 2.0) will be considered a stable
> version?
>
> Actually, let me ask the full question: Is there any correlation between
> Orion's version number and
.5.2, as it has very many
bugfixes and enhancements.
There's no correlation between version numbers and development vs stable
releases.
On 28/3/02 2:44 pm, "Michael Crozier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ,
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full
,
Hello,
Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full EJB 2.0) will be considered a stable version?
Actually, let me ask the full question: Is there any correlation between
Orion's version number and whether it is considered stable or unstable? Is
their concept of stability just what they reco
Is it possible to use SSL with the EJB container of the Orion server? For
example the client is a standalone Java application that makes only RMI-IIOP
calls to EJB-s (no JSP, no servlets, no HTML involved) in the EJB container.
And I want to do this with security in mind, for example using SSL. Is
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:09:47PM -0800, Ray Harrison wrote:
>
> Moving among different app servers, I still use ejb-ql functionality
> in the ejb-jar.xml file, its just that when it is deployed on Orion,
> I have to add the finder functionality to the orion-ejb-jar.xml
> file. I think in 1.5.4,
s also supposed to be in
the latest "early access" version of Oracle.
The other vendors play similar games, as I don't believe weblogic 7.0 is yet
_released_.
Ironflare is much more clear on this point, since Ironflare's website
clearly indicates that 1.5.2 only meets ejb 1.1 w
Simon Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies, I probably didn't make myself sufficiently clear. With EJB
> 2.0, aren't finder queries meant to be specified in the ejb-jar.xml
> file using EJB-QL? Consequently, Orions's lack of support for EJB-QL
> means tha
Apologies, I probably didn't make myself sufficiently clear. With EJB
2.0, aren't finder queries meant to be specified in the ejb-jar.xml
file using EJB-QL? Consequently, Orions's lack of support for EJB-QL
means that it's currently not possible to write portable CMP EJBs.
I take it from the comments that have been made that the "partial"
support for EJB 2.0 is really "partial" Is it possible to write my
finders in EJB-QL yet? I suspect not, but that'd be really
useful.
Also, I've written a couple of 2.x CMP Entity Beans that have a
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:36:44PM -0800, The elephantwalker wrote:
> > sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible.
>
> Silly question, but doesn't this make writing EJB 2.0 CMP beans a
> little tricky? And if it's not too far off topic, how does JBoss
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:36:44PM -0800, The elephantwalker wrote:
> sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible.
Silly question, but doesn't this make writing EJB 2.0 CMP beans a
little tricky? And if it's not too far off topic, how does JBoss
compare?
Cheers,
Simon
--
"Dark under f
At 12:17 PM 3/25/2002, you wrote:
>Hi,
>does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including
>local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ...
>
>Michael
I would just be happy with the JMS working correctly, have the JMS message
types don't work at all!
This include
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Maurer
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Orion EJB 2.0 final
Hi,
does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including
local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ...
Michael
re concise
information. I do know that j2ee1.3 compliance is a top priority and that they are
working
feverishly on it.
Cheers
Ray
--- Michael Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including
> l
Hi,
does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including
local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ...
Michael
iding features of EJB 2.0 ",
stated in oracle's statement of direction !!
We hope this would come out ASAP :)
-MS\>
> I've been told by pretty good sources that it's coming in the next release.
> Unfortunately they could give me a solid answer on when this next r
I've been told by pretty good sources that it's coming in the next release.
Unfortunately they could give me a solid answer on when this next release will
be, other than "soon" :)
--- Dan Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if/when full EJB2.0 / J2EE1.3 support will be availab
Does anyone know if/when full EJB2.0 / J2EE1.3 support will be available in
Orion? i.e. Local interfaces and CMP2.0. They seem to have been on an
"almost" EJB2.0 spec for months. I bet Oracle get full compliance first...
_
Hi Magnus!
> Hi.
> You currently need to have your CMR fields as in ejb-jar.xml.
> That should fix your problem.
What do you mean exactly? I have my fields defined as
can you tell my whats wrong with the snippet below?
>> >
>> >
>> > article-category
>> >
>> >
>
Hi.
You currently need to have your CMR fields as in ejb-jar.xml.
That should fix your problem.
WR
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]For Ray Harrison
> Skickat: den 9 oktober 2001 16:37
> Till: Orion-Interest
> Amne: Re:
Orion only supports a partial ejb2.0 spec - an older one at that. I don't believe it
supports
many-many out of the boxmore ejb2.0 coming up!
--- Christoph Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm trying to get some cmp2.0 beans with relations running on orion
> 1.5.2.
>
>
> I hav
Hi all!
I'm trying to get some cmp2.0 beans with relations running on orion
1.5.2.
I have two beans: Article and Category, and a m:n relation between
them.
in CategoryBean.java i have:
public abstract java.util.Collection getArticles();
and in ArticleBean:
public abstract java.util.Col
Hey Jacek,
That's a good question!
I'm still waiting for the answer , too!
The current version 1.5.2. supports only EJB 2.0 Public Draft partially.
There's nothing about the final draft out since august 17th! (ejb spec. 2.0)
So:
IS ANYBODY OUT THERE WHO KNOWS IT ??
hopefully, Ton
Jacek -
Orion has only partial support for EJB 2.0 based on an earlier PFD document. Local
interfaces are
not part of the Orion build just yet but will be in the coming months I am sure.
Cheers
Ray
--- Jacek Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody.
> I'm
e generally - what features of
EJB 2.0 does Orion support?
Greetings
--
Jacek Bialecki
$> cd pub
$> more beer
I understand that BEA will support it in version 6 which should be
available real-soon-now.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: satish.gunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:44 AM
To: orion-interest
Subject: RE: EJB 2.0 Approved
Has it been declared
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:33 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: AW:RE: EJB 2.0 Approved
Sensitivity: Confidential
Hi,
as far as I know there is no cluster support for EJBs with the current
version of the Orion server.
Hence this means that the
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Solinsky, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:01 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: EJB 2.0 Approved
>
>
> THIS MESSAGE
ubject: RE: EJB 2.0
Approved
Has
it been declared approved formally? Or does the ballots suggest that it is
going to be approved?
Has
any of the app server vendors come out with plans in rolling out their EJB2.0
servers?
Satish
-Original Message-From
: Monday, September 10,
2001 8:01 AMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: EJB 2.0
ApprovedTHIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE
INTERNET - Please read the detailed disclaimer
below.--
I haven't seen
anything here about this:
http://www.jcp.or
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: AW:RE: EJB 2.0 Approved
Sensitivity: Confidential
Hi,
as far as I know there is no cluster support for EJBs with the current
version of the Orion server.
Hence this
t;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Solinsky,
>Jason
>Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:01 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: EJB 2.0 Approved
>
>
>I haven't seen anything here about this:
>
>http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp
If
anybody is at JAOO this week, please ask Karl about this.
Regards,
the
elephantwalker
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Solinsky,
JasonSent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:01 AMTo:
Orion-InterestSubject: EJB 2.0
I haven't seen
anything here about this:
http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp
The EJB 2.0 Standard
was approved by the Java Community Process on Wednesday the 4th. Now that the
orion developers can be sure that the standard will not change, what sort of
timeline can we expec
Since, according to the JCP, at http://jcp.org/jsr/stage/proposed.jsp the
EJB 2.0 spec is currently in Proposed Final Draft Status and, according to
the EJB 2.0 JSR Detail, the Final Ballot on the Reference Implementation
(RI) and Compatibility Technology Kit (CTK) does not come until 04
For planing purposes, it would be very valuable to know what the orion
timeline for EJB2.0 availability is.
JWS
This e-mail communication and any attachments are confidential and intended
only for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are
> Hi!
>
> I have been tying to deploy some EJB 2.0 having 1:many relationships
> without much success.
>
> The postings I found seemed to contain mixed information whether there
> should be cmp-field entry for the cmr field in the ejb-jar.xml file or
> not. All of the p
inalized". They have included the spec in the latest release of j2EE 1.3
>beta(2)...I am
> somewhat suspect of that article
>
>
> --- Ray Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Finally! This is very good news indeed!
> > --- Simon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTE
m
somewhat suspect of that article
--- Ray Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally! This is very good news indeed!
> --- Simon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The JCP just approved the EJB 2.0 specification. Read the article here:
> >
>
Finally! This is very good news indeed!
--- Simon Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The JCP just approved the EJB 2.0 specification. Read the article here:
>
> http://www.crn.com/sections/BreakingNews/breakingnews.asp?ArticleID=28281
>
___
The JCP just approved the EJB 2.0 specification.
Read the article here:
http://www.crn.com/sections/BreakingNews/breakingnews.asp?ArticleID=28281
support.
peace - scot
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Does anyone know when EJB 2.0 local interfaces will be available in Orion ?
>
> Apparently they are not currently implemented (see
> http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?OrionServerSpecSupport).
>
> What would be really nice would be to detai
Does anyone know when EJB 2.0 local interfaces will be available in Orion ?
Apparently they are not currently implemented (see
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?OrionServerSpecSupport).
What would be really nice would be to detail more what is supported in Orion
1.5.2 on the main page of the orion web
Hi all,
I am using Orion 1.4.7 (and other versions), EJBGen 1.19, EJB 2.0 and
HypersonicSQL (last version).
The problem I am having is with all my finder methods that return a single
bean instead of a Collection. I can't get the single bean finders to work no
matter what I try. The spec
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Some problems implementing EJB 2.0 type OR
> Hello,
>
> I'm also having this problem with my web-application. How did you solve
it?
>
> TIA
>
> Mathias Bogaert
>
Hi,
I'm trying to change the way my application does OR on my entity beans. I
have encountered a problem.
Using Orion 1.4.8.
I have an EJB which has a vector field, listIDs, which contains Integer ID
references to child EJBs. In my EJB code I have used the following syntax:
public static fin
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
Ooops,
my bad.
-AP_
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
ParanskySent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:37 PMTo:
Orion-InterestSubject: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
I'm
still reading but here is what I'm learning:
Dependent objects (as they were in PFD1) are gone. They have been
replaced
with
something called a local view. An entity bean may have either a
remote
view
or a local view, bu
Appendix E Revision History - E12 Proposed Final Draft 2
--- Alex Paransky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is outI read the spec, and still saw the
> Dependent Objects in there. Where does it say that the DOs are gone?
>
> -AP_
>
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
I read
the spec, and still saw the Dependent Objects in there. Where does it say
that the DOs are gone?
-AP_
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russ
WhiteSent: Friday, April
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
Am I
the only one that think the following makes more sense?
EJBObject -> Local interface
RemoteEJBObject -> Remote interface
as
opposed to
EJBObject -> Remote interface
EJBLocalObject -> Local interface
Isn't
is
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
Here is the section that says what is different between
PFD 1 and 2:
E.12 Proposed Final Draft 2
Introduced local interfaces and local home interfaces for entity beans and session beans.
Added characterization of local client view.
Added
Title: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out
I'm reading it now. Dependent objects are gone.
-tim
Hi All
I am told that CMP in EJB 2.0 support multiple table-joins
such that you can reflect the master-detail relationships
among tables by using foreign keys in deployment decriptors.
Then how about BMP? Is there anything we can do to
use two BMP beans with master-detail relationship?
Thanks
I'm no expert either. I have just started. Anyway, it seems like your are
mixing some concepts here (IMHO).
It seems like your trying to "normalize" your bean by having a foreign key
(jobid) to Job. This, should be a reference to the class, i.e.
public abstract setJob(Job ajob) not an integer. If
robably on
very thin ice when saying this.
- Original Message -
From:
fresnaULL
To: Orion-Interest
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 10:58
AM
Subject: EJB 2.0 again, again, please.
Hi,
I have the following entity beans which have a
1-1 relationship:
Hi,
I have the following entity beans which have a 1-1
relationship:
person(id(integer), name(varchar))
job(id(integer), name(varchar))
This is part of my ejb-jar.xml:
2.0Person PersonHome Person PersonBean java.lang.Integer False Container id name
jobi
terestSubject: Again EJB 2.0
Hi,
I have the following entity beans:
person(id(integer), name(varchar))
job(id(integer), name(varchar))
So, this is my ejb-jar.xml:
Person
EJB CMP
2.0Person person.PersonHome person.Person person.PersonBean java.
Hi,
I have the following entity beans:
person(id(integer), name(varchar))
job(id(integer), name(varchar))
So, this is my ejb-jar.xml:
Person
EJB CMP
2.0Person person.PersonHome person.Person person.PersonBean java.lang.Integer False Container id name
j
Thanks, Jeff for your many informative posts.
I checked out the ServerTest.zip you posted and it seems my files look
pretty much like yours. I noticed you had entered the abstract schema names
of your beans, which I had not, in expectation that it would make no
difference. I have now added such n
ple findByField method, Orion figures
out how to create the appropriate finder-method in orion-ejb-jar.xml.
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:48 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: EJB 2.0
Title: SV: EJB 2.0 CMP features of Orion
One more thing,
currently, you need to add the object on each end of the bidirectional 1-n relation.
Finders are automatically generated for simple expressions, such as
findByCustomer, findbyId etc
but does not handle
findByCustomerAndId
etc.
And Im
Title: RE: EJB 2.0 CMP features of Orion
1:1 and 1:N between two ejb's works fine. The only difference
is in the tags where you describe the second
bean in the relationship.
For a dependent:
many
Address
For an ejb:
many
Contact
The and s
Has anyone tried out OR-mapping of 1-1 relationships and 1-n relationships
between two EJBs? I have seen Jim Archer's fine tutorial about EJBs having a
1-1 or 1-n relationship to a *dependent object*, but is the same thing
possible between two EJBs?
I know the web site states that Orion 1.2.9 does
It seems to me that Orion does not yet support EJB-QL neither EJB 2.0
many-to-many relationships.
However, if you are interested in EJB 2.0 and finders, you may have a look
at http://www.orionsupport.com/.
Giustino De Vincentiis
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Marc Rabil [mailto:[EMAIL
It's not clear looking through the documentation how much of EJB 2.0 Orion
currently supports. Specifically, I am interested in using CMP and EJB QL
to do advanced queries of a multi-table database. Best I can understand the
current technology, I have 2 choices: 1) use findAll() a lo
I apologize that this is off topic, but its probably of interest to
everyone here. For anyone interestred in EJB 2.0, there is a great book
available at:
http://www.mvcsoft.com
Its included in their persistence manager product. BTW, that persistence
manager is a complete implementation of
meddelande-
>> Från: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Skickat: den 7 februari 2001 13:57
>> Till: Orion-Interest
>> Ämne: EJB 2.0 EB n<-->m implemented?
>>
>>
>> Hi All...
>>
>> Does anyone know if many to many relationships bet
Title: SV: EJB 2.0 EB n<-->m implemented?
Hi,
no, its not there yet. :(
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: Jim Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Skickat: den 7 februari 2001 13:57
> Till: Orion-Interest
> Ämne: EJB 2.0 EB n<-->m implemented?
>
&
Hi All...
Does anyone know if many to many relationships between EBs is implemented
on Orion 1.4.7?
I was going to write a bit of code to test it, but my laziness got the
better part of me and I was hopeing someone else had already discovered
this and could save me a bit of work ;-)
Thanks!
FYI, all three of the EJB 2.0 CMP examples work with Orion 1.4.7. Thanks
guys for fixing that so quickly!
Jim
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by
Hi All...
I just ran my EJB 2.0 CMP Do OM example through Orion 1.4.6. It breaks with
the error pasted below. I just thought I would let everyone know...
Jim
EmailDo_ORCollection5.java:294: String not terminated at end of line.
"n
^
EmailDo_ORCollection5.java:294: Invalid expression stat
-ver001a.ear"
2. setting of default-web-site.xml
should be
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 25, 2001 9:48 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: EJB 2.0 with dependent 1 <--> n sample available
Hi All...
As promised, the EJB 2.0 CMP example with 1 to many EB to dependent
relationship
Hi All,
JA> As promised, the EJB 2.0 CMP example with 1 to many EB to dependent
JA> relationships is available. Its posted at:
Thanks for this good example, Jim!
I have a question: I played with DOs and orion a few months ago,
and had some problems:
How do I remove DO's? Simpl
Hi All...
As promised, the EJB 2.0 CMP example with 1 to many EB to dependent
relationships is available. Its posted at:
http://www.archer.net/test20CmpDoOM.zip
Please let me know if you have any problems with it.
Jim
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Archer
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:50 PM
>> To: Orion-Interest
>> Subject: EJB 2.0 Dependent object example now available
>>
>>
>>
USERS table and an ADRESSES table. Is that
possible with CMP? Any tutorials on that?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Archer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:50 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: EJB 2.
Hello all...
Many people have written me requesting I provide an EJB 2.0 CMP example
that uses a dependent object. To all who asked, I apologize for the delay.
I have sent it to Joe for posting on OrionSupport, and it is right now
available at:
http://www.archer.net/Test20CmpDo.zip
This
Inserted yesterday in bugzilla as bug #260
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Stanislav Bernatsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledÍ 24 gennaio 2001 11.03
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: EJB 2.0 support in orion 1.4.5
Hello.
It seems that MessageDrivenBeans don't work in
Hello.
It seems that MessageDrivenBeans don't work in orion 1.4.5.
All fine in orion 1.4.4
Best regards,
Stanislav Bernatsky
Original Message-
> From: Peter Pontbriand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Complex O/R and EJB 2.0 CMP
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:11:41AM -0500, Peter Pontbriand wrote:
> Speaking of Lists, has anyone at all managed to get an Orion list-mapping -
> whether declared in a EAR-contained orion-ejb-jar.xml or in a EJB2.0-style
> ejb-jar.xml - to actually preserve the element order?
With orion-ejb-jar.x
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: Complex O/R and EJB 2.0 CMP
* SNIP *
> Take a look at the documentation for orion-ejb-jar.xm
is, is there any examples anywhere of some
> complexor code with client code which drives it?
> Anyone care to post or email some examples?
>
> Also, when will orionsupport be back up?
>
> Thanks,
> -Darren
>
>
>> "Also,
>> what is the difference in the
is the difference in the EJB 2.0 CMP and orion
>proprietary CMP.
You're asking about "CMR", container managed relationships, not CMP.
Orion was apparently providing CMR services before there was an EJB2.0,
and the information is maintained in the orion-ejb-jar.xml file. EJB2.0
al
> And it doesn't support container managed relationships
> between dependent
> objects.
>
> Joni
>
It does support dependant objects (EJB->DO) but not
EJB -> DO -> DO. I think this is what you are saying.
I submitted this bug (#185) some time ago but it hasn't
been looked at.
-tim
which drives it?
Anyone care to post or email some examples?
Also, when will orionsupport be back up?
Thanks,
-Darren
> "Also,
> what is the difference in the EJB 2.0 CMP and orion
> proprietary CMP."
>
> I think Orion supports Maps and Sets for dependent
> objects,
> From: Konstantin Polyzois
> I think Orion supports Maps and Sets for dependent objects, the EJB2
> (proposed final draft) only mandates support for Sets.
> Orions implementation does not look complete yet (how could
> it be when there
> is no spec?) it lacks EJB-QL, Home-methods and Select-me
"Servlet/JDBC is sure looking a bit simpler right now."
But of course it is. If there is no concurrency (multiple clients) and if
you don't like object-oriented programming. And if you dont plan on building
more than a few servlets.
"Also,
what is the difference in the E
piled, and
run (if only I could run something against it). Also,
what is the difference in the EJB 2.0 CMP and orion
proprietary CMP.
Servlet/JDBC is sure looking a bit simpler right now.
Hopefully, some info and more examples are available
to help get an environment setup with CMP EJB's, to
w
en post just the pertinent
> parts of you code for us to look at.
>
> All I know that has been implemented is EJB 2.0 draft
> 1 entity beans. Two things that don't work are
> bi-directional relationships (bug ?) and
dependent->dependent
> relationships (bug 185).
>
>
Search back through the archives. There are several
examples and questions w/ answers. If that doesn't
answer your questions (and the one in your previous
post regarding 1:1), then post just the pertinent
parts of you code for us to look at.
All I know that has been implemented is EJ
What part of the EJB 2.0 spec has been implemented in
orion as of 1.4.4. for example is EQL, Select Methods,
Home methods, Dependant Object working? does anyone
know where i can find the full list of features. i
really want to start developing 2.0 compliant beans, but
can't if i don&#
Title: RE: ejb 2.0 relations in orion 1.4.3 broken ?
Hi Alex,
well, the ATM needs to be updated a bit.
Its descriptor is stuck somewhere between 1.1 and 2.0 during that it has been updated as the 2.0 implementation progressed.
Hopefully, I will get time to do this this weekend.
WR
EEK!
Axel, I have not yet tried to verify this and am not dure how to work
around it, but if you are sure please Bugzilla it as soon as possible. I
was just reviewing the bug list and saw that Magnus seems to be making
excellent progress in cleaning up the EJB 2.0 persistence manager
The current ATM example uses EJB 2.0 definitions of ont-to-many
relationships (account_owner -> account) . When I deployed it on
orion 1.4.3 it workes quite well until I added some accounts.
After shutting down orion and re-login all accounts are lost. A quick
look into the hsql file (.scr
EEK!
No sooner do I send this note than I see I was wrong on two counts.
First, Sun yesterday released the "Proposed Final" version of the EJB 2.0
spec. Kevin, grab that one instead of public draft 2, of course. I'm glad
to be wrong! This is great news!
Next, Orion and W
Hi Kevin...
Currently, the only good source of info on how to develop for EJB 2.0 is
the spec. But thats not so bad. The spec is very well written and has
examples of code and descriptors. I will send you a 2.0 CMP example off
list (I sent it off to Joe for inclusion on Orion Support, but it
gt; Jeff Schnitzer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John D'Ausilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 8:40 AM
>> To: Orion-Interest
>> Subject: RE: EJB 2.0 Dependent bidirectional relationships
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
