At 13:58 12.10.00 , you wrote:
> >it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
> >well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
> >port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
> >clustering support) at an unbeatable price. so
At 13:58 12.10.00 , you wrote:
> >it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
> >well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
> >port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
> >clustering support) at an unbeatable price. so
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
>
> Sybase JDBC drivers are called "JConnect". Current version is 5.2 (for
> JDBC2) and 4.2 (JDBC1)
>
> I had a few problems with them ages ago and bought a commercial driver -
> never tried again, but they have evolved I think.
> > And JDBC drivers for Sybase? Las
>it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
>well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
>port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
>clustering support) at an unbeatable price. somehow nobody outside germany
>seems to
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Kinnvall
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 5:29 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
>
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > I'm not sure wh
-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Rimov
> > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:06 PM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
> >
> >
> > At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> I'm not sure why noone has mentioned Sybase yet? Sybase 11.0.3.3 on Linux is
> free for all uses, and supports replication, backup servers etc etc etc.
> Very full featured and quite fast from my experience, a true enterprise
> RDBMS.
And JDB
L PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Rimov
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:06 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
>
>
> At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl
At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl? They're both free, but Postgresql
>has a
>JDBC driver that's XA-compliant. Also, mySQL is known to blow away your whole
>database if it has a bad crash, whereas Postgresql is better at persisting
>data
>through a
