On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Alex Paransky wrote:
> I did, posting a question with the subject "Implementing using CMP quickly
> runs in to limitation...". You responded with
>
> "there are servers (like orion or ejipt and
> probably many more) that let you define whatever sql you like for your
> finder
one mentioned earlier its not
as
portable, but also the java compiler or Orion deployment tool will
always
catch table/column name errors and type errors where as hardcoded SQL
won't.
Just my 10 euros.
Regards
Rob Hargreaves
-Original Message-
From: Dale Bronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
t: Thursday, April 06, 2000 5:50 AM
Subject: RE: Is CMP is useless?
> Dale,
>
> I think your opinion on entity beans may be clouded by your use of Jonas
> 1.6.
> We used Jonas in our project up until about 3 months ago. The entity bean
> performance in jonas is absoulutely
ame errors and type errors where as hardcoded SQL won't.
Just my 10 euros.
Regards
Rob Hargreaves
-Original Message-
From: Dale Bronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 April 2000 14:54
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Is CMP is useless?
I do not claim to be an expert in any way,
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Bronk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: Is CMP is useless?
> They create a ton more sql calls than if I simply do my own sql obj
rian Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: Is CMP is useless?
> RE:
> "On the other hand, if
> you want to CMP, your simple example will take at least 3 sql calls."
>
> Or: on
il 04, 2000 10:26 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: Is CMP is useless?
a really great place to discuss or get information on this topic is sun's
EJB-INTEREST mailing list. the archives are full of extensive and mostly
very competent postings regarding this very design issue (CMP vs BMP vs
dir
rDescriptors
I'll try to post an example of using the returned Collection (or
enumeration...) tomorrow for those who care.
Anyone got a sample already? One that is deployed in XML/Orion style?
Brian Cunningham
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
a really great place to discuss or get information on this topic is sun's
EJB-INTEREST mailing list. the archives are full of extensive and mostly
very competent postings regarding this very design issue (CMP vs BMP vs
direct SQL) and many other general ejb design questions.
regards,
robert
Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: Is CMP is useless?
> But using stateless session beans to execute SQL means you have to embed
the
> SQL commands in to your code. This breaks the model that CMP is trying to
> achieve. If so
8:40 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: Is CMP is useless?
>From my experience stateless session bean is a better choice for complex
lookups, especially
if they return enumeration of objects.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Sanderson)@itglink.com> on 04/04/2000 10:49:17
AM
To: Orion-Inter
>From my experience stateless session bean is a better choice for complex
lookups, especially
if they return enumeration of objects.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Sanderson)@itglink.com> on 04/04/2000 10:49:17
AM
To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Is CMP is
I don't knowI never thought Employees and sex mixed that well
anyways
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Paransky
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 9:04 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Is CMP is useless?
Is it my imagination
Is it my imagination, but the minute any kind of complex finding is required
on an entity bean, CMP becomes useless. For example, I have entities called
EMPLOYEE, PERSON, and SEX (M/F/Other you know).
EMPLOYEE is a PERSON with SEX.
I have a function in EmployeeHome, findFemaleEmployees(). Ho
14 matches
Mail list logo
