RE: Orion (Was: Architecture)

1999-01-03 Thread Kevin Duffey
Hi, >This is true - but this is why one would choose JAVA, not strictly why one >would choose Orion IMHO. Most servlet engines, EJB containers and the like >will work with standard code, whether they have proprietary extensions or >not. Thus if you write portable code, you can shift server. >The

RE: Orion (Was: Architecture)

1999-01-02 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
rrie Sent: Friday, 5 November 1999 3:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Orion (Was: Architecture) In reference to the thread about managers being afraid of choosing Orion, I'd like to point out that it's an implementation of strictly defined standards. When you're developing with Orion,

Orion (Was: Architecture)

1999-01-02 Thread Luke Gorrie
In reference to the thread about managers being afraid of choosing Orion, I'd like to point out that it's an implementation of strictly defined standards. When you're developing with Orion, you're not developing code with dependencies on proprietary APIs, only on standards. This means that you can