RE: What documentation?

2001-02-27 Thread Ray Harrison
; projects. They just need some time to mature. > > -Original Message- > From: Gary Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:41 PM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: Re: What documentation? > > > Today, Danut Prisacaru ([EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: What documentation?

2001-02-27 Thread Danut Prisacaru
Thanks Gary! It does help. Danut At 06:41 PM 2/26/2001 -0700, Gary Shea wrote: >The same thing was bothering me, because having to modify orion's >deployment descriptors was getting old. >It turns out that you can make the orion web, ejb, and application >deployment documents be part of your dis

RE: What documentation?

2001-02-27 Thread Kemp Randy-W18971
7:41 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: What documentation? Today, Danut Prisacaru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, I still have the same problems and I am asking the same question: why > is not possible to use a GUI tool to specify all I want for deploying my > application? Why do I n

Re: What documentation?

2001-02-26 Thread Magnus Stenman
see this happen. The description should have continued after the ref as well (and now does). Hope it helps! /Magnus Stenman, the Orion team - Original Message - From: "Nick Newman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: What documentation?

2001-02-26 Thread Gary Shea
Today, Danut Prisacaru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, I still have the same problems and I am asking the same question: why > is not possible to use a GUI tool to specify all I want for deploying my > application? Why do I need to go into the application-deployments folder > and modify what Or

Re: What documentation?

2001-02-26 Thread Nick Newman
I think I can answer the second question about the dangling sentence. In the DTD the tag description looks like this: and from that it seems fairly clear that the intention was for the sentence to run on into the tag name. That is, the author thought it would be fairly clear that it was