RE: Stateless bean and remove

2001-05-13 Thread Frank Eggink
k Eggink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: Stateless bean and remove > >Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 19:48:49 +0200 > > > >Nope, as a rule you will have a limite

RE: Stateless bean and remove

2001-05-11 Thread Ed Bras
-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Stateless bean and remove >Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 19:48:49 +0200 > >Nope, as a rule you will have a limited number of stateless session beans >at anyone >moment instantiated in

RE: Stateless bean and remove

2001-05-11 Thread Frank Eggink
Nope, as a rule you will have a limited number of stateless session beans at anyone moment instantiated in your container, due to the nature of a stateless bean. The container can 'garbage collect' them. Guess it will do that after some time out. If you are seriously concerned about resource us

Stateless bean and remove

2001-05-11 Thread Joni Suominen
Hi! This question should propably be asked in EJB-INTEREST mailing-list but I raise it here since I am not currently following it. So apologize me if you feel that this is a bit offtopic. The question is simple: Is it required to call the remove() method on stateless session bean after finishing