]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: CMP beans and Container Managed Transaction question <- more
information
> More developments...
>
> With -Djdbc.debug=true, the failed transaction leaves a Dirty Connection
arou
More developments...
With -Djdbc.debug=true, the failed transaction leaves a Dirty Connection around on
both Oracle and PostgreSQL, so I guess the next question is... what constitutes a
Dirty Connection? and is that's what's causing the lock?
In further trials, we also tested updating that row
I'm hoping someone can give some insight as to why this is happening. I have a very
simple test case with one stateless session bean and 2 CMP entity beans. The session
bean just acts as a controller to modify the entity beans. All transactions are
container-managed at the session bean. The ent
ptiembre de 2001 13:32
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Transaction question ?
>
>
> Eddie wrote:
> >
> > Hellu,
> >
> > Please some help on the following transaction scenario ?:
> >
> > I am receing some information through a HTTP post meth
Eddie wrote:
>
> Hellu,
>
> Please some help on the following transaction scenario ?:
>
> I am receing some information through a HTTP post method. The servlet,
> running as part of a J2EE application, calls a EJB method A. The EJB method
> does some little processing. After this, it checks som
Hellu,
Please some help on the following transaction scenario ?:
I am receing some information through a HTTP post method. The servlet,
running as part of a J2EE application, calls a EJB method A. The EJB method
does some little processing. After this, it checks some conditions, and
might do som
Subject: RE: Transaction question
> from the ejb-2.0 spec, it is a little unclear, but it says that putting a
> deafault transaction attribute is ok, and the default will be used for all
> methods that are not explicitly defined to have a different transaction
> attribute.
>
> so this s
y, August 06, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: Transaction question
> Set up a default transaction-attribute for your bean.
>
> This is from the EJB 2.0 draft.
> Page 353
> Section 17.4.1
>
> Use a "*" for the .
>
>
> EJBNAME
> *
>
>
> - Seth
&
the
SmsManager
nl.unwired.sgs.sms.SmsManager
Remote
B
RequiresNew
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:48 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Transaction question
I
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eddie Post
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:48 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Transaction question
I already replyed to this message but noticed that it never came through...
so here it is again...
Thanks for the earlier reply.
My reaction:
I understand what you do belo
or methods with a regular expression or something like that ??)
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:49 PM
Subject: RE: Transaction question
> i think y
27;t I define a transaction type as default for example, and make an
exception for the method B ??
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: Transactio
sorry , thats what i meant...cut and paste mistake
-Original Message-
From: Juan Lorandi (Chile) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: Transaction question
Bottom line... you can't do that. J2EE doesn't supp
x){}
}
so B will execute in a new transaction and rollback when an exception is
thrown. A will finish wihtout throwing an exception and commit its own
transaction.
-Original Message-
From: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject:
[YOUR_METHOD_HERE]
RequiresNew
therefore, all methods are marked as 'Required' but [YOUR_METHOD_HERE],
which is marked as 'RequiresNew'
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Martes, 24 de Julio de 2001 4:47
>
Hellu hellu,
Please some advise on the question I posted some days ago (see below)?
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: "Eddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:47 AM
Subject: Transaction question
Hellu,
I don't know how to configure the following transaction scenario with CMP.
Please some help or maybe a little example:
I have two bean methods: A and B.
A calls B and I want that when B throws a RemoteException that A intercepts,
that B performs a rollback and A not !
I know how to do that
17 matches
Mail list logo