On 7/6/17, 10:50 PM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
On 07.07.2017 07:33, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 6/15/17, 4:36 AM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
>
> Currently, change of 'pmd-cpu-mask' is very heavy operation.
> It requires destroying of all the PMD threads and cre
On 07.07.2017 07:33, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 6/15/17, 4:36 AM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
>
> Currently, change of 'pmd-cpu-mask' is very heavy operation.
> It requires destroying of all the PMD threads and creating
> them back. After that, all the threads will sleep until
> po
On 6/15/17, 4:36 AM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
Currently, change of 'pmd-cpu-mask' is very heavy operation.
It requires destroying of all the PMD threads and creating
them back. After that, all the threads will sleep until
ports' redistribution finished.
This patch adds ab
Currently, change of 'pmd-cpu-mask' is very heavy operation.
It requires destroying of all the PMD threads and creating
them back. After that, all the threads will sleep until
ports' redistribution finished.
This patch adds ability to not stop the datapath while
adjusting number/placement of PMD t
