"AE" probably translates to "metered." I used to make the same
mistake when talking about my 6x7.
It's still a very good deal and an amazing camera.
Welcome to the Brotherhood.
Chris
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:49:21 -0700, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah crap! I just KNEW there was a
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be adapted. Thanks!
Zoom !
f:4/28-70
f:2.8/28/70
xx/35-70
...
others ?
On Oct 16, 2004, at 9:37 AM, Cotty wrote:
He's certainly getting around - I wonder if he qualifies as the most
travelled PDMLer (to meet other PDMLers) ?
Does distance count?
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On Oct 16, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Dave wrote:
Will the methods described in this thread work for my purposes, or
will they only apply to the individual computer I'm working at?
They should work just fine, provided you set the file association using
a Mac.
If you copy a file from a Windows PC it won't
Another one from the archives.
I've done the unthinkable here: I digitally removed a couple of big
blades of grass from the bottom of the picture. I did my best to avoid
them at exposure-time but I could only raise the camera by so much :)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=16-
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html
This is still a bit of a "work in progress" - there are a few things yet to
do with some details, but I thought I'd present it anyway. Be happy for
comments and criticism.
Shel
God, Shel, you're getting old... Forget spotting, go digital and check this:
http://www.eminem.com/
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Back to Diana Krall and another hour of spotting
Thanks for the update I'll take another look at the features a little
later, but at first glance it looks like a worthy alternative to the
EyeOne. This version looks like it's more than a "bells and whistles"
upgrade, too.
Back to Diana Krall and another hour of spotting
Shel
> [Original
On 16 Oct 2004 at 14:01, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I don't have personal experience as yet, but, if I were to buy a
> calibration setup today, I'd probably buy this one. Thus far I've been
> calibrating my monitor using the Pantone Colorvision Spyder, which is
> pretty good, and which I'm using bec
On 16 Oct 2004 at 23:09, Raimo K wrote:
> It´s not sharp.
> All the best!
Hmm, I kind of agree, it looks quite blunt, I still don't know if you'd be
allowed on an aircraft with it though particularly if it were a poison variety.
I have no problem with the image sharpness of course.
Rob Studde
Hi Paul ... turns out there's a 55mm Zeiss Jen Biotar:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=707&item=3845176961
Shel
> From: Paul Stregevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I looked at my files of K and M42 lens photographs in the folder, "60mm to
> 79mm". I found nothing that begins
I believe there were at least a couple of 58mm lenses both Minolta and
Topcon had one, iirc.
Hmm, that Ziess Jena 75/1.5 Biotar sounds very interrrestink. Thanks for
mentioning it.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stregevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I looked at my files of K and M42
Well, Steve, that's totally not my style no desire for an autofocus
lens to be used on my older bodies in this case, and, for no other reason
than I can't stand the added bulk, weight, reduced light transmission or
inconvenience (optical quality notwithstanding) I don't use teleconvertors.
I b
> Has anyone had experience with the 2x Pentax conv.? I have several
> mixed opinions from fellow photographers...some swear by a good
> teleconverter, and others say the have never met a good one.
David, take a look at the concurrent thread entitled "Pentax 2x
converter A" for some comments on Pe
> [The a 2X-S's] are very well made. I also had a T6-2X which was
> optically just as good, and also well made, but didn't have quite
> such a rock-solid feel to it. Finally, I've also had a Takumar 2X,
> which felt very flimsy.
I've found that the 7-element A 2X-S and the 6-element T6-2X seem to
> Otherwise, the Tokina 100-300/4 AF, which is said to be even
> better than its manual-focus forebear. Big and heavy, but a fine
> performer.
I've never used the autofocus version of the AT-X 100-300/4, but it
must be fantastic if it's better than the manual focus version.
I have some sample sho
Hi, Peter.
> I would like to add some longer lens to my small collection. The
> longest lens I have is my favorite M 135/3.5 - sharp and small.
> But I need some more. I could buy mint Sigma 135-400 quite cheap
> [snip] Would I go better with some Pentax zoom in that price
> range? I plan to use
You can tell from the framing. I would have stuck a macro lens right
between the landscapes.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Your choice of subject...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter J. Alling"
For a moment there I thought you were the caveman.
Say what?
William Robb
I believe Topcon made a 58. Of course there are the screw mount 55
Takumars. Very good lenses. Had one of those when I was a teenager with
my first SLR in 1966 -- used Honeywall Pentax H2 with 55 mm. f1.8
Takumar. And here I am rambling, showing my age.
Joe
No. My error in terminology. I have a meter prism (vs plane pentaprism - no
meter).
Regards,
Bob...
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There was no AE prism for the 6x7 or 67, only the 67II
had that option. You didn't get a 67II for that price
did you?
JCO
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[
Ah crap! I just KNEW there was a catch!
Regards,
Bob...
From: "Collin R Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You'll need a second one for B&W.
And a third for chromes.
:)
CRB
At 16:36 2004.10.16 -0700, you wrote:
Yup.
I just purchased a 67 with AE pentaprism& f/4 165mm with leaf shutter,
both in LN c
I took it out this evening to my favorite test subject. Results: It is
indeed quite good at f2.8 (I think Heiko or Jens first reported this??),
and improving, of course, thereafter.
Very slight lateral CA on my test subject, visible in PS only with great
enlargement. I probably wouldn't have no
There was no AE prism for the 6x7 or 67, only the 67II
had that option. You didn't get a 67II for that price
did you?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Move to the Dark Side
You'll need a second one for B&W.
And a third for chromes.
:)
CRB
At 16:36 2004.10.16 -0700, you wrote:
Yup.
I just purchased a 67 with AE pentaprism& f/4 165mm with leaf shutter,
both in LN condition. Both were obtained for US$500, so I couldn't resist.
My old 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 Speed Graphics can re
Good buy. You will enjoy both camera and lens.
Congratulations.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 7:36 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
Yup.
I just purchased a 67 with AE pentaprism& f/4 165mm with leaf shutter,
both in LN condition. Both were obtained for US$500, so I couldn't
resist. My old 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 Speed Gr
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: A Move to the Dark Side
Yup.
I just purchased a 67 with AE pentaprism& f/4 165mm with leaf
shutter,
Welcome, Brother Blakely.
Brother William.
Yup.
I just purchased a 67 with AE pentaprism& f/4 165mm with leaf shutter, both
in LN condition. Both were obtained for US$500, so I couldn't resist. My old
2 1/4 x 3 1/4 Speed Graphics can rest a while now.
I have to go work out now so that I can wield the damn thing!
Regards,
Bob...
I sent a message with a link to a presentation Thursday, but haven't seen
it arrive yet. In any case, I've now switched to a folder (because it
looked better!), so if the first message arrives, you can safely ignore
it
Somebody said something about odd signs the other day - well here are
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
How about an FA31mm Limited and a 2x teleconverter? :-)
S
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be adapted. Thanks!
Shel
Thanks...
I have purchased a very nice Pentax A2X-S. I appreciate your input.
For now it will be used with my 105 macro and 200 f4. I hope to get a 200
2.8 in the future, but I'll need to save my pennies.
Thanks again.
David
He said h was considering the converter A2-S.
On Oct 16, 2004, at 5:37 PM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Which converter A, there are according to BOZ's site three, the A-S
the A-L and the Takumar A?
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/teleconverters/index.html
Super Dave wrote:
Has anyone had any experience wi
Thanks Ken.
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Timing is everything. Nice capture Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW: Another Side of Detroit
Few realize that the Detroit suburbs are chock full of lakes and
tre
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
>
> Taken *ist D w/200mm/f4.0 ED Macro.
>
> Comments solicited & appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kenneth Waller
Musroom gills?
Have you thought about sending a group of these to Games Magazine for a q
A chantarelle or oyster mushroom?
Maybe a bracket fungus.
mike
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Should have added - Do you know what this is?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" Subject: Paw: ?
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
Taken
Right, Bill. Even if a very good scanner (better than my 3200 Epson) might
get better quality from film, I still get the advantage of getting the
pictures fast - and the chance to re-shooting my mistakes at once. Anyway,
the digital shots are "good enough" for my purpose - so why waste time on
mone
Timing is everything. Nice capture Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW: Another Side of Detroit
> Few realize that the Detroit suburbs are chock full of lakes and trees.
> The image of downtown casts the entire area in unf
Peter J. Alling wrote:
"If I remember correctly Cosina's K mount 1.2 normal lens was a 58mm.
They are apparently hard to find and rather expensive thought."
Cosina's K-mount f/1.2 normal lens was 55mm, like all other third-party
f/1/2 lenses in K mount (Porst, Rikenon, Revuenon, Vivitar) or scre
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:35:06 -0400
Collin wrote:
"I picked up an Achiever flash with Ricoh module.
Is it the same as Pentax?"
I can't recall whether Achiever is another brand of my Ritz Quantaray 9500,
which uses brand-specific modules, too. For the Quantaray, I investigated
this very question
Voightlander is selling with the Chrome Bessaflex (Topcon look alike), a
58mm "Topcor" 1.4.
Paul Stregevsky wrote:
I looked at my files of K and M42 lens photographs in the folder, "60mm to
79mm". I found nothing that begins with a 6; just the Pentax 77mm FA
Limited, a Carl Zeiss Jena 75/1.5 Biot
He said he was considering the A2X-S converter. Of all the Pentax
converter it is probably the best all around choice. You can use it
with any long glass Pentax has ever made, which is not the case with
the L version.
Paul
paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 5:37 PM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Which converter
I looked at my files of K and M42 lens photographs in the folder, "60mm to
79mm". I found nothing that begins with a 6; just the Pentax 77mm FA
Limited, a Carl Zeiss Jena 75/1.5 Biotar in M42, and and a Voigtlander Color
Heliar 75/2.5K.
No 58mm lenses, either.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
Now Mishka, are you SURE? ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 3:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EYE ONE, Gretag
>
>
> NOO!!!
>
> mishka
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:46:25 +0200, Jens
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You may be able to find a 58mm in M42.
I have never understood why lens makers
always left a big gap between 55mm and 85mm.
68mm would have filled that gap nicely and
they could have easily made a F2.0 at that
focal length too.
Yeah, but why?
keith whaley
JCO
-Original M
NOO!!!
mishka
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:46:25 +0200, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> DOES ANYONE HAVE EXPERINCED TO SHARE WITH THE (SCREEN) CALIBRATION TOOL
> CALLED EYE ONE, FROM GRETAG ?
> JENS
>
> Jens Bladt
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/
It´s not sharp.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: Paw: ?
> Check out http://mypeople
On 16/10/04, jtainter, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Just picked up my DA 14 f2.8 at the post office. Not the first on the
>list with it, but the first North American? Anyway, I definitely set the
>record as the PDMLer who waited longest for it after placing an order (on
>3 June).
>
>Nicely built,
Sorry. So you want a 35/2 SMCP like SMCT so 160-200 in mint condition and
125-170 in excellent condition.
Shen
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Value of SMCP 35/2.0
The lens in qu
You may be able to find a 58mm in M42.
I have never understood why lens makers
always left a big gap between 55mm and 85mm.
68mm would have filled that gap nicely and
they could have easily made a F2.0 at that
focal length too.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be adapted. Thanks!
Shel
Just picked up my DA 14 f2.8 at the post office. Not the first on the list with it,
but the first North American? Anyway, I definitely set the record as the PDMLer who
waited longest for it after placing an order (on 3 June).
Nicely built, heavy, lots of resistance in manual focus.
Thanks, Nguy
Few realize that the Detroit suburbs are chock full of lakes and trees.
The image of downtown casts the entire area in unfortunate tones of
gray and black. In truth, the metropolitan area is one of the most
beautiful of any large city. Here's a shot of Sylvan Lake at sunset. I
grabbed this on t
I've had fairly good luck with the AF 400T as well. I generally minus
the exposure comp a bit as you've indicated. I always use a
sof'shoulder or omnibounce.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I actually have reasonable luck with it when using the AF400T big
flash. Set the c
A stack of moldy tortillas?
Seriously, it's an interesting image, and I have no idea what it is. It
appears that it could be something "natural," like a fungi or mushroom
of some sort.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 12:11 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offw
I've seen some great BW printing from Digi files. A lot of the pro
books that come through the agency have some BW. Most of it is inkjet
printed with grayscale inks.
In regard to how PS CS has changed my perspective on digital
photography, it's all about being able to take it to another level.
On 10/16/04 12:14 PM, "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should have added - Do you know what this is?
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
Part of a mushroom?
Cheers,
NB
I actually have reasonable luck with it when using the AF400T big
flash. Set the camera to ISO 400, set the flash to TTL, set the
camera exposure comp to about -2 and take a few test shots to see if
my exposure comp is ok. Also, shoot in Raw - buys you more latitude
for the shots that are still o
On 16/10/04, Kenneth Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Should have added - Do you know what this is?
>
>Kenneth Waller
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Kenneth Waller" Subject: Paw: ?
>
>
>> Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
Very nice.
Burnt
Should have added - Do you know what this is?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" Subject: Paw: ?
> Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
>
> Taken *ist D w/200mm/f4.0 ED Macro.
>
> Comments solicited & appreciated.
>
> Tha
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
Taken *ist D w/200mm/f4.0 ED Macro.
Comments solicited & appreciated.
Thanks,
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling"
For a moment there I thought you were the caveman.
Say what?
William Robb
For a moment there I thought you were the caveman.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Don Sanderson"
Subject: *ist-D TTL Flash with M Lenses?
Has anyone played with this enough to figure it out?
Yes.
I set the camera at 400 and pray.
TTL flash control has never been one of Pe
But then aren't we all.
Cotty wrote:
On 16/10/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Tiny???
Cosmically speaking. Man.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand wh
Thanks Bill, I'm finding the same thing.
Seems to be ok most of the time at 400 and 1/90th
but every so often it misses by a mile on the under side.
The two series where it got steadily more underexposed
seems to only happen at ISO 200.
Haven't tried with A lenses and the 360FGZ, hope that
works a
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PhotoShop CS-First Impressions
Good move. You won't regret it. Switching to PS CS changed my whole
perspective on digital photography.
Gosh Paul, I thought it was the "mediocre snapshot camera" that
swayed you.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: RE: De-Lurking and Replacement Decision
I can't resist saying, that I shot enough shots in just 5 weeks
(with my
*ist D) to pay for it - app. 5000 frames. 5000 shots on film would
equals
the ammont of film/delveloping, which represents t
- Original Message -
From: "Don Sanderson"
Subject: *ist-D TTL Flash with M Lenses?
Has anyone played with this enough to figure it out?
Yes.
I set the camera at 400 and pray.
TTL flash control has never been one of Pentax's strong points, and
the TTL on the istD is one of the worst imp
If you can spare $2000, the Sigma 120-300/2.8 AF.
Otherwise, the Tokina 100-300/4 AF, which is said to be even better than its
manual-focus forebear. Big and heavy, but a fine performer.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
On 16/10/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Tiny???
Cosmically speaking. Man.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:11:45 -0700
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Value of SMCP 35/2.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Shel wrote:
"Any thoughts on what a reasonable eBay price for the above lens might be?"
I
search ebays completed auctions and take the average
of the prices sold for. If you don't find any, it's scarce
and probably worth more than listed value below
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
The lens in question is neither an M nor an A it's a SMCP, what is
commonly called a K lens. Totally different optic.
Shel
> Shen wrote:
>
> >With accord 'McBroom's', it will be 130-170$ in excellent condition for
> >SMCP-M and 170-200$ in Mint condition for SMCP-A
There's not enough surgery in all of Christendom...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got Tanja beat on milage though not on looks
Have you considered surgery?
;-)
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks thr
Tks, Paul
Shel
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would guess about $175 to $200.
> > Any thoughts on what a reasonable eBay price for the
> > above lens might be?
Hi Paul ...
I've switched to PS CS, but it hasn't changed my perspective of digital
photography. How has switching changed yours?
One thing I have noticed is that PS CS allows me to be a more careless
shooter because of all the ways a photo can be fudged or fixed in
Photoshop. Unfortunately, it
McBroom's is way out of date and has almost no correlation to e-bay prices.
Shen wrote:
With accord 'McBroom's', it will be 130-170$ in excellent condition for
SMCP-M and 170-200$ in Mint condition for SMCP-A
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Tiny???
Cotty wrote:
On 15/10/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
In terms of mileage, wouldn't Tanja be the one to beat?
In terms of number of trips, it's probably a contest between Jostein and
César.
But aren't you in there somewhere?
Mileage, yeah. Cesar! Of course, the ro
Not really, I'm constantly amazed at e-bay prices.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Any thoughts on what a reasonable eBay price for the above lens might be?
Shel
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigne
Don,
It has been discussed before the *istD doesn't perform very well with TTL flash. Your
best bet is to use the sensitivity setting at ISO400, as that is supposed to give he
best results.
YMMV. Just give it a try. I found the same problems with my external Metz flash.
When I switch from TTL to
This one time, at band camp, Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, my friend does have some problems with exposure with the pentax
> ringflash (ttl) on Ist D. Any suggestions please?
A good start would be to tell us exactly what problem(s) your friend
is having.
Kind regards
Kevin
---
Hi, my friend does have some problems with exposure with the pentax
ringflash (ttl) on Ist D. Any suggestions please?
thanks
Good light!
fra
Believe it or not, I was sober when I wrote that. Bery interesting
On Oct 16, 2004, at 7:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I get it. I didn't understand what you meant by plugsin. Bery
interesting. Where can I read more about these plugsins? Or were they
created specifically for your system?
Paul
On
Thanks Herb.
On Oct 16, 2004, at 8:01 AM, Herb Chong wrote:
here the are plugins i use all the time.
Pictographics iCorrect EditLabPro 4.5 www.picto.com
FixerLabs FocusFixer 1.3 www.fixerlabs.com
Extensis Intellihance Pro 4 www.extensis.com
when necessary, i use
Reindeer Graphics Optipix 3.0 www.re
Yes.
Stan
On Oct 16, 2004, at 5:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got Tanja beat on milage though not on looks
Have you considered surgery?
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I can't resist saying, that I shot enough shots in just 5 weeks (with my
*ist D) to pay for it - app. 5000 frames. 5000 shots on film would equals
the ammont of film/delveloping, which represents the same value as the *ist
D body!
Welcome tio the list, Rick!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
here the are plugins i use all the time.
Pictographics iCorrect EditLabPro 4.5 www.picto.com
FixerLabs FocusFixer 1.3 www.fixerlabs.com
Extensis Intellihance Pro 4 www.extensis.com
when necessary, i use
Reindeer Graphics Optipix 3.0 www.reindeergraphcis.com
Kodak Digital ROC 1.2 www.asf.com
Visu
Taking your intersts into account, I too can recommend buying af PZ-1 or
PZ1-p - both brilliant cameras. As you know the PZ1-p is a lot faster, than
the PZ1, which, on the other hand has a built-in timer, that the PZ1 doesn't
have. An alternative could be the MZ-5n.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
DOES ANYONE HAVE EXPERINCED TO SHARE WITH THE (SCREEN) CALIBRATION TOOL
CALLED EYE ONE, FROM GRETAG ?
JENS
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Rick,
I don't own an *istd.
I've no interest in getting sucked into digital manipulation of my stuff.
(Which I fight with my 4 meg Sony P&S...)
I also worry about resolution with digital.
(I'm just fighting enablement.)
I shoot mostly slides, no post process for me.
I do like the slide exposures
This one time, at band camp, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good move. You won't regret it. Switching to PS CS changed my whole
> perspective on digital photography.
Mine also, I installed PS CS on the iMac, now I have moved to The GIMP
PS is surplus to my needs
Kind regards
Kevin
Tried it.
It works. ;-)
Thanks!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 2:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *ist-D TTL Flash with M Lenses?
>
>
> Don, i may be wrong here as i dont have the camera yet,b
Shel,
Absolutely right, this is a vendor near the parking for the Natural
History Museum, home of Sue the dinasoar. (It's now in the shadow the
newly renovated Soldier Field, home of the Chicago Bears.)
I learned a lot that day. You photographed all the people I normally
just walk by. You enga
Hi Frank.
Knowing this is a series,I like it.Performing artist with her viewing public, front
row. I
love the
expressions an how all 3 men are looking at this.Unless i have missed some others i
still
like number 2
from a few months ago better.This one does not seem to portray the "sexy" part a
Shel
At 22:54 2004.10.15 -0400, you wrote:
FYI,
whoever was looking for a SMCP (K series) 50mm f1.4, I have just
posted one:
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
Later,
JCO
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendri
I just tried this test again at 15 feet.
Same gradual variation except this time all
shots were 3-4 stops underexposed.
???
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 6:30 AM
> To: PDML
> Subject: *ist-D TTL Flash with M Len
Good move. You won't regret it. Switching to PS CS changed my whole
perspective on digital photography.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 5:13 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Got the upgrade to CS installed and the RAW Plugin updated last night.
Other than the new RAW handling and the new tools I've also found
t
This one time, at band camp, "Trevor Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day Kev & Tan.
> If you find out who and where, Please give me a Cooee.
> I'd be interested in doing it too.
I found photographers creative here
http://www.photocreative.com.au/
I think what they are offering is a little
Don, i may be wrong here as i dont have the camera yet,but,i remember others saying
earlier in the
year,the camera performs flash best at ISO 400.
Maybe try that.
At least your digital works>vbg>
Dave Brooks
> Has anyone played with this enough to figure
Has anyone played with this enough to figure it out?
I took a series of flash shots with the built in flash.
35/3.5 M lens from about 3 feet.
All at 1/125 second at full stop increments from 4 to 22.
Camera set at "M", of course.
They don't show anywhere near a full stop difference
from one frame
I would guess about $175 to $200.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 2:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Any thoughts on what a reasonable eBay price for the above lens might
be?
Shel
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
