Re: IR Photo using calculations

Thanks for commenting Paul. Sunday was a cloudless day around here. The sky could have used some big fluffies i suppose. Coulda cloned some in if i was thinking.I was mainly trying to get a PS adjustment that was ir looking but not blown out. I think i need to do more net research. Dave Qu

Re: IR Photo using calculations

Thanks for the comment Bruce. It was a bit under exposed but i brought it up in Raw. I tried channel mixer and a few others, but the whites just looked to blown out even for IR.:-) I remember reading about Calculations in Scotts book, and thought id see what it produced. It is tricky, for me

Re: IR Photo using calculations

Hello David, There doesn't seem to be as much separation between the trees and sky as I would like. Gives it a odd feel for me. One of these days, I'm going to have to take a stab at this IR stuff - seems to be very tricky to work with. -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, April 3, 2006, 5:55:05 P

Re: IR Photo using calculations

Interesting effect. Good exposure. I wonder if the sky might have been more interesting than the water? Paul On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:55 PM, David J Brooks wrote: http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Photos.html It looks pretty rough, almost film like. Comments.?? istD 16-45 at 1/60 F4 and

IR Photo using calculations

http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Photos.html It looks pretty rough, almost film like. Comments.?? istD 16-45 at 1/60 F4 and i thinnk iso 1600 Dave Equine Photography in York Region