he rear lens
> > surface. After I 'reported' the real condition of lens to
the seller, he
> > said I could return the lens for money refund or I could
keep it if I
> > accept his partial refund (only $10).
> >
> > This is my first time to buy used lens. Pl
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Mark Stringer wrote:
> If you knew about the scratches before buying you probably wouldn't have
> bought it. The scratches would bother me every time I used it (although
> some of my equipment is not pristene). Send it back. You will never be
> able to sell it in good cons
ace. After I 'reported' the real condition of lens to the seller, he
> said I could return the lens for money refund or I could keep it if I
> accept his partial refund (only $10).
>
> This is my first time to buy used lens. Please give me any suggestion.
Any time you return an item
ent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:16 AM
Subject: Money refund
> Recently, I have ordered a used Pentax SMC F (not FA) 50/1.7 for US$75
> because the seller said it is in like new condition. But when I received
> and inspected it, I found there are some minor scratches on the rear lens
> su
he
said I could return the lens for money refund or I could keep it if I
accept his partial refund (only $10).
This is my first time to buy used lens. Please give me any suggestion.
Frankie
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
5 matches
Mail list logo
